 | Pierre Bayle, Craig Brush - 1991 - 496 oldal
...was one of the arguments of this sophist to oppose motion. If a body moved, he used to say, it would move either in the place where it is or in the place where it is not. But it does not move, neither in the place where it is, nor in the place where it is not. But it does not... | |
 | Terence Irwin - 1995 - 450 oldal
...space in which to move. The full version, as recorded by Sextus, is this: 'If something moves, it moves either in the place where it is or in the place where it is not. But it moves neither in the place where it is [for it is at rest in itl, nor in the place where it is not... | |
 | Stephen Roth, Stephen Roth Institute - 2002 - 364 oldal
...recorders of the Greek tradition gives it this form: Zeno argues thus. Either the moving object moves in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not. And it does not move in the place where it is [since at each present moment it is at rest in a place... | |
 | Michel Blay - 1998 - 230 oldal
...the not understanding of this last proposition. For they say, that, if any body be moved, it is moved either in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not; both which are false; and therefore nothing is moved. But the falsity lies in the major proposition;... | |
 | Keimpe Algra - 1999 - 946 oldal
...assumption at all. The better known of these is dilemmatic in form: If something is moving, it is moving either in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not. But neither is it moving in the place where it is (for it is at rest in it), nor in the place where it... | |
 | James Trefil - 2003 - 476 oldal
...catching up. Here's another form, in Zeno's own words: If anything is moving, then it is either moving in the place where it is or in the place where it is not. However, it cannot move in the place where it is ifor the place in which it is at any moment is the... | |
 | Zeno (of Elea.) - 1936 - 142 oldal
...polemic. The argument itself is quite clear from the two passages. If a thing is moving it must be moving either in the place where it is or in the place where it is not. But (i) the second alternative is absurd; (2) a body, if it is in a given place, must be at rest. Therefore... | |
 | Horace William Brindley Joseph - 1906 - 582 oldal
...possibility (or perhaps we might say, the intelligibility) of motion : If a body moves, it must either move in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not But it can neither move in the place where it is, nor in the place where it is not .•. It cannot move.... | |
| |
If a body moves, it must move either in the place where it is, or in the place where it is not : but either of these is impossible : therefore it cannot move. 
