Oldalképek
PDF
ePub

Book I, tion he obtained from the King permission to have a pardon Like or drawn, in which, amongst other provisions, it was granted cc^o°"EET ^at110 account whatever should be exacted from Somerset at the royal exchequer; and to that pardon the King directed the Chancellor to affix the Great Seal. The Seal, however, was withheld, and a remarkable scene ensued in the Council Chamber. There are extant two or three narratives of the occurrence, which agree pretty well in substance. Of these Gondomar's is the most graphic. The incident took place on the 20th of August. The despatch in which it is minutely described was written on the 20th of October. There is reason to believe that the Ambassador drew his information from an eye-witness of what passed.

'As the King was about to leave the Council Board,' writes Gonuomar, 'Somerset made to him a speech which, as I was told, had been preconcerted between them. Thi Scenk He said that the malice of his enemies had forced him to Cotmcil ask for a pardon; adduced arguments of his innocency; Chamber, an(j faen besought the King to command the Chancellor

RESPECTINO D ©

The p*»Dos to declare at once what he had to allege against him, or

DRAWN BY . .

Si.r, else to put the seal to the pardon. The King, without Somerset, permitting anything to be spoken, said a great deal in Augwt. Somerset's praise; asserted that the Earl had acted rightly in asking for a pardon, which it was a pleasure to himself to grant—although the Earl would certainly stand in no need of it in his days—on the Prince's account, who was then present.' Here, writes Gondomar, the King placed his hand on the Prince's shoulder, and added—'That he may not undo what I have done.' Then, turning to the Chancellor, the King ended with the words: 'And so, my Lord Chancellor, put the seal to it; for such is my will.' The Chancellor, instead of obeying, threw himself on his knees, told the King that the pardon was so widely drawn B<x«t. that it made Somkrset (as Lord Chamberlain) absolute Li«o» master of 'jewels, hangings, tapestry, and of all that com»r"" the palace contained; seeing that no account was to be demanded of him for anything.' And then the Chancellor added: 'If your Majesty insists upon it, I entreat you to grant me a pardon also for passing it; otherwise I cannot do it.' On this the King grew angry, and with the words, 'I order you to pass it, and you must pass it," left the Council Chamber. His departure in a rage, before the pardon was sealed, gave Somerset's enemies another opportunity by which they did not fail to profit. They had the Queen on their side. On that very day, too, the King set out on a progress, long before arranged. For the time the matter dropped. Before the Ambassador of Spain took up his pen to tell the story to his Court, Vjlliers, 'the new favourite,' had begun to supplant his rival; so that the same despatch which narrates the beginnings of the fall of Somerset, tells also of the first stage in the rapid rise of Buckingham.

About a month after this wrangling at the Council Board, Somerset again advised with Sir Robert Cotton ?iV>0« on the same subject. Cotton recommended him to have BT the Pardon renewed ; saying to the Earl, 'In respect you 1616.8eP' have received some disgrace in the opinion of the world, in having passed' [t.e. missed] 'that pardon which in the ^T''°fl'h'" summer you desired, and seeing there be many precedents of larger pardons, I would have you get one after the largest pis. R U.j precedent; that so, by that addition, you may recover your honour.' Strangely as these closing words now sound, in relation to such a matter, they seem to embody both the feeling and the practice of the times.

In another version of the proceedings at the trial of May,

Book i, 1616, Somerset is represented as using in the course of uvr. of his defence these words: 'To Sir Robert Cotton I referred corfoT" the who,e drawing and despatch of the Pardon.' And again: ' I first sought the Pardon by the motion and persuasion of Sir Robert Cotton, who told me in what dangers great persons honoured with so many royal favours had MS. Report stood, in former times.' Sir Robert's own account of this (R.H). and of many correlative matters of a still graver sort has come down to us only in garbled fragments and extracts from his examinations, such as it suited the purposes of the law-officers of the Crown to make use of, after their fashion. The original documents were as carefully suppressed, as Cotton's appearance in person at the subsequent trial was effectually hindered. At that day it was held to be an unanswerable reason for the non-appearance of a witness,—whatever the weight of his testimony,— to allege that he was regarded by the Crown as 'a delinquent,' and could not, therefore, be publicly questioned upon 'matters of State.' There is little cause to marvel that a scrutinising reader of the Slate lYia/s (in their published form) is continually in doubt whether what he reads ought to be regarded as sober history, or as wild and, it may be, venomous romance.

One other incident of 1615 needs to be noticed before we proceed to the catastrophe of the Gondomar story. i6i6. In May of this year Sir Robert wrote a letter to Prince

May 24.

Charles, which is notable for the contrasted advice, in cou'cie'op. respect to warlike pursuits, which it proffers to the new r.fi.,1- Prince, from that more famous advice which had but

'A* Anmtr

...to muxn recently been offered to his late brother. He had

^'(Apriir lately found, he tells Prince Charles, a very ancient volume

1809)- containing the principal passages of affairs between the two kingdoms of England and France under the reigns of Book I. King Henry The Third and King Henry THE FlWH, and Life or had caused a friend of his to abstract from it the main cl*TM*" grounds of the claim of the Kings of England to the Crown of France; translating the original Latin into English. This he now dedicates to the Prince, 'as a piece of evidence concerning that title which, at the time when God hath appointed, shall come unto you.' He ends his letter in a strain more than usually rhetorical: —' This title hath heretofore been pleaded in France, as well by ordinary arguments of civil and common law, as also by more sharp syllogisms of cannons in the field. There have your noble ancestors, Kings of this realm, often argued in arms; there have been their large chases; there, their pleasant walks; there have they hewed honour out of the sides of their enemies; there—in default of peace- SirRCot,on

_ r to Prince

able justice—they have carried the cause by sentence of charier the sword. God grant that your Highness may, both in »as. M.7.) virtues and victories, not only imitate, but far excel them.' ^m']

The royal commission for the first examination of Cotton Ttu' K^40

J Archbishop

was issued on the 26th of October, 1615. Two months of canterafterwards he was committed to the custody of one of the h£Z'„tK Aldermen of London. His library and papers were also searched. >uij«»vi,

Cotton's accusation was that of having communicated (e.ho papers and secrets of State to the Spanish Ambassador. He was subjected to repeated examinations, which (as we have seen) are extant only in part. He maintained his innocence of all intentional offence. e The King,' he said, 'gave me instruction to speak as I did. If I misunderstood BT

D • Commission

His Majesty my fault was involuntary. I followed the j°"6-AprilKing's instruction to the best of my belief and recollection.'

Cotton's

EXAMINA

Boost The examiners, however, were more intent by far on Lrraor extracting something from Cotton that would tell against coTM7F8T Somerset, than on the punishment of the fallen favourite's ally and agent. Coke, in particular, was indefatigable in the task. It was as congenial to him as was the study of Bracton or of Littleton.

What then must have been his delight when,—whilst attending a sermon at Paul's Cross,—word was brought to hiin which gave hope of a discovery of Somerset's most secret correspondence? The pending proceedings had stirred men's minds in city and suburb, as well as at Court. A London merchant had been asked, a little while before, to take into his charge a box of papers. The depositor was a woman of the middle class, with whom his acquaintance was but slight. At that time there was nothing in the incident to excite suspicion. But, at a moment when strange rumours were afloat, the depositor suddenly requested the return of the deposit. The merchant bethought himself that the circumstances now looked mysterious. If the papers should chance to bear on matters of State, to have had any concern with them, howsoever innocent, might be dangerous. He carried the box to Sir Edward Coke's chambers. Not a moment was lost in apprising the absent lawyer of the incident. Such news was of more interest than the sermon. Probably, the preacher had not finished his exordium, before all the faculties of Coke and of a fellow-commissioner were bent on the letters which had passed between Somerset and Northampton.

If Gondomar is to be believed, some secret papers belonging to King James himself were part of the precious spoil.*

•' Por diferentes vias le confirmado que contra el Conde

[Somerset] no se averigua cosa de sustancia en lo de la muerte del
Ovarberi; y de la del Principe [Henry, Prince of Wales,] no ha permetido

« ElőzőTovább »