« ElőzőTovább »
ART. I.-ON THE UNITY OF THE HUMAN RACE. 1. Types of Mankind: or, Ethnological Researches, based
upon the Ancient Monuments, Paintings, Sculptures and Crania of Races, and upon their Natural, Geographical, Philological and Biblical History: illustrated by Selections from the Inedited Papers of Samuel George Morton, M.D., and by additional Contributions from Prof. L. Agassiz, LL.D., W. Usher, M. D., and Prof. H. S. Patterson, M.D. By J. C. Nort, M.D., and GEORGE R. GLIDDON.
Philadelphia, 1854. 2. The Ethnological Journal. Edited by LUKE BURKE. First
Series, London, 1848. Second Series, London, 1854. 3. Denkmäler aus Agypten und Æthiopien nach der Zeich
nungen der von Seiner Majestät dem Könige von Preussen Friedrich William IV. nach diesen Ländern gesendeten und in den Jahren, 1842–1845, ausgefahrten wissenschaftlichen Expedition auf Befehl seiner Majestät von R. Lep
sius. 5 Vols., plates, (elephant folio). Berlin, 1849 to 1854. 4. A Comparative Grammar of the Sanscrit, Zend, Greek,
Latin, Lithuanian, Gothic, German and Sclavonic Languages. By Prof. F. BOPP. Translated by Lieut. EASTWICK, M. R. A. S. 3 Vols. London, 1845 to 1850.
VOL. IX-NO. XX.
5. Twelve Lectures on the Connexion between Science and Re
vealed Religion. Delivered in Rome, by NICHOLAS WISEMAN, D.D. 2 Vols. London, 1836.
A story is told in one of Marryatt's novels of a clerical abolitionist who handed round his hat to a ship's company just paid off, at the same time presenting each of the sailors with a little print representing a negro kneeling in chains with uplifted hands and saying, "Am I not a man and a brother ?" One of the tars, having spelled out the inscription, came up to the philanthropist and demanded, “Do you mean to insinuate that this black rascal is really my brother ?” “Undoubtedly,” replied the friend of humanity. “Then take that, and that," retorted the sailor, as he cut short a further appeal to his fraternal feelings by knocking down the hatchway the man who had so grossly insulted him.
The slight difference of opinion here exhibited illustrates in a homely manner a more important controversy which, for many years carried on in the scientific world and handled, as well in this as in other periodicals, is now, by the publication of the great work at the head of our list, fairly before the American publicthe question of the Unity of the Human Race. This phrase has gradually become a conventional term to express the idea that all mankind are descended from a single pair, once for all created in a single spot.
That there should be any doubt upon a point so plain may surprise some persons; for, although the ancients with one voice (unless the Jews are an exception-a question to be considered presently,) assigned diverse origins to different nations, the belief that all mankind are descended from Adam and Eve is so general throughout Christendom, that it may be called universal. To it we are indebted for one of the sallies of Beatrice, in “Much ado about nothing."
“ Leonardo. Well, niece, I hope to see you fitted one day with a husband.
“ Beatrice. No, uncle, I'll none; Adam's sons are my brethren and truly, I hold it a sin to match in my kindred."
The very word mankind or man-kinned, meaning the whole human family, testifies to the popular notion.
Of late years, however, the unity of the human race has begun to be questioned, and Morton, Agassiz, Van Amringe, Hamilton, Smith, Burke, Knox, Caldwell, Jacquinot, Hombrou, Giebel, Vivey, Bory de St. Vincent, Desmoulins, Broc, Klemm and Zeune on the one hand, and Pritchard, Latham, Wiseman, Badiman, Smyth, Johnes, Bunsen, Serres, De Salles, Klee, Buchez, &c., on the other, have discussed the matter with the greatest learning and acuteness. The quarrel is a very pretty quarrel as it stands, and, as Sir Roger De Coverly and Lord Eldon used prudently to observe, "a great deal may be said on both sides.” So complicated indeed is the problem, and so dependent for its solution upon a due consideration of Biblical hermenutics, comparative philology, history, comparative anatomy, archäology and other (mostly modern) sciences having little connection one with another, that writers on ethnology have usually confined themselves to one branch of the subject. This remark (with the exception that the comparison of languages is, to a great extent, omitted) does not apply to Nott and Gliddon’s “Types of Mankind," an elaborate work, which, as will be seen, takes up the different branches in turn.
Stimulated by the appearance of this remarkable book, we have thought it might not be unwelcome to such of the readers of the Southern Quarterly Review as have not kept pace with the inquiries which have recently thrown light on this interesting subject, to be presented with a résumé (necessarily brief) of the chief arguments for and against the Unity of the Human Race. As the advocates of the unity doctrine were in possession of the ground before the battle was delivered, it will, perhaps, be the most regular to hear them first, and while it will not be conceded on which side the balance of evidence appears to lie, an endeavor will be made to state the case of both plaintiff and defendant with perfect fairness.
The principal arguments in favor of a descent of all men from a single pair may be reduced to three, viz: those drawn from
Scripture, from philology, and from the phenomena of hybridity. And
First, The argument drawn from the BIBLE.
The strongest texts are the following, being the only ones cited by Dr. Bachman in his controversy with Morton : *
" And Adam called his wife's name Eve, because she is the mother of all living." Gen. iii, 20.
“And the sons of Noah that went out of the Ark were Shem, Ham and Japhet: and Ham is the father of Canaan; these are the three sons of Noah, and of them was the whole earth overspread. Gen. ix., 18, 19.
“God hath made of one blood all nations of men to dwell on the face of the whole earth, and hath determined the bounds of their habitation.” Acts xvii, 26.
To these may be added the following:
“For as in Adam all die, so in Christ shall all be made alive." 1 Cor. xv, 22.
“ The first man Adam was made a living soul, the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.” 1 Cor. xv, 45.
The bare enunciation of these passages, especially taken in connection with the wide spread belief that certain vital doctrines of orthodox theology are based upon the descent of all mankind from a single “federal head” is sufficient with many to settle the question without further inquiry. The lesson of the primer that
«In Adam's fall We sinned all,
confirmed by the deliberate judgment of after years that this doctrine is implied throughout the sacred volume is not to be lightly shaken by the vague reasonings of (it may be) an infidel philosophy. “All the races of men who are interested in Christ and his gospel are, and must be of Adamic origin, seed and blood. All to whom that gospel is to be sent must, of necessity, be of the same stock. And hence, as it is expressly commanded to preach this gospel to every creature in all the world, all must be of the same original Adamic family and origin.”ť
* Charleston Medical Journal, vol. 5, p. 508.
To this it is replied to by those who advocate a plurality of origin,
1. That they have no wish to attack either religion or the Bible, but, on the contrary, have a profound reverence for both. That in the same way that geologists, as long as possible, ascribed all fossil remains to Noah's flood; so out of deference to existing prejudices, their conclusions were at first forced into harmony with the general interpretations of the Bible on this subject by supposing a miracle wrought either on Shem, Ham and Japhet; or at the tower of Babel to produce the existing diversities of color and speech among men ; that this theory, and all others * framed to reconcile science and popular theology were abandoned only in obedience to a logical necessity; and that on the other hand, it is intolerable that the odium theologicum should embarrass the calm investigation of a question strictly scientific.
2. That the genius of Oriental phraseology forbids that universal terms should always be understood literally; e. g., “And all the earth sought the face of Solomon to hear his wisdom,” (Kings, X. 24;) and that if there are texts in the Bible which seem to prove that all mankind are descended from Adam and Eve, there are others again which clearly indicate the contrary. Whence, it is asked, did Cain get his wife in the land of Nod, after he became a fugitive and a vagabond on the earth? Abel is murdered, and Adam, Eve, and Cain only, as the sacred narrative clearly informs us, remain.
« And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can bear. Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth, and from thy face I shall be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a
* A known deceased naturalist has held the wondrous opinion that Ham, after his father had cursed him, became black from grief, and was the lineal progenitor (stammvater) of the negroes. Which of the three sons of Noah became Kalmucks ? Genesis indicates three races (Menschenschöpfungen) at a much earlier day in the children of Adam, of the Elohim, and of the Nephilim, &c.; so that Adam appears merely as the stem-father of the Iranian [Indo-European] race, because Paradise also points to Armenia.” Prof. De August Zune (Uber Schädelbildung zur festern Begründung der Menscheuvassen, Berlin, 1846, p. 2) quoting “S. Schiller “uber die erste Menschengesellschaft nach der Mosaichen Urkunde.'»