had commenced with Mr. Scott and Mr. Hogg, he disregards all the passages in the nobler poets of our day which evidence their superiority to those he has already attempted, and instead of copying or imitating what is beautiful, he selects only what is peculiar, and most open to ridicule. Our readers, we are sure, will not have forgotten the exquisite romantic poem of Christabel, an account of which we inserted in No. V. Vol. III., which, as we then observed, contains more delightful passages than have ever before been included in so small a compass: in what light the writer of The Poetic Mirror views it, may be gathered from the extracts we shall give from his imitation: it is entituled Isabelle, a name nearly idem sonans with Christabel; thus indicating in the outset the true nature of this poetaster's essay. It has not the glimpse of a fable, and consists merely of the stringing together of a few stanzas of incoherent nonsense. "Can there be a moon in heaven to-night, That the hill and the grey cloud seem so light? For there is no moon, I know it well: ("Tis wonderful how well they know,) "It is a strange and lovely night, That, falls so thick I see its hue? Said Isabelle, so let it be! "Why does the Lady Isabelle Counting the racks of drizzly rain, And how often the Rail cries over again? Craik, craik-Craik, craik. Ten times nine, and thrice eleven ;— That last call was an hundred and seven. Let it come, I have no fear! Yet it is a dreadful work, I wis, CRIT. REV. VOL. IV. Nov. 1816. 30 "Sounds the river harsh and loud? There's two for heaven, and ten for hell, Said the Lady Isabelle." Really there is no criticizing such stuff as this: it is about the most miserable attempt of the kind we ever recollect to have read. When applied to individuals, ridicule creates a fictitious personage for a laughing-stock, with such a distant likeness to the original as will just serve for recognition; and when applied to literature, it raises an imaginary work, with all the faults and singularities grossly exaggerated: if it is handled with seasoned wit and satire, the weapon is irresistible; but without them, it is a twoedged sword in the hands of a clown-he only cuts his own fingers. Even a few years ago, when the public would not have been extremely fastidious as to the mode in which certain class of poets were brought into disrepute, this effort by our nameless detractor would not have been endured; but, thanks to the good sense of the reading class of society, and to the recently-created taste for the productions of our elder and better poets, that favourable opportunity for a satirist is gone by; and though it is still very easy to render good poetry ludicrous, yet it is very difficult, in the present day, to make even the uneducated receive ridicule without distrust: whenever ridicule is resorted to, we may be tolerably sure that it is the dernier resort; and that the employer of it feels that other modes of attack would be unavailing. In this volume, besides those we have referred to, there are three fragments charged upon Mr. Wordsworth, two upon Mr. Southey, and three or four upon Mr. Wilson, the author of the Isle of Palms, the City of the Plague, &c. There is nothing in the history of literature that gives us greater pleasure than the growing estimation in which the productions of the first named of these gentlemen are held. The principles upon which he started as an author were so repugnant to what had until then almost appropriated to itself the name of poetry, that he had many difficulties and repugnances to overcome:-those who had habitually considered poetry to depend more upon the language, than upon the thought that language conveyed-who had been accustomed to admire full-sounding bombastic lines as the very quintessence of excellencecould not at first relish productions composed of the real language of men in a state of vivid sensation, which is the very foundation of the system of Mr. Wordsworth: they who had been used to hear the most familiar expressions tricked in the ponderous trappings of phraseology, for a time could endure nothing else; but within the last few years a rapid improvement in this respect has taken place, and the public begin to perceive that they had been misled by those who had little else but words to give them: a vocabulary would supply all the materials for their effusions; and if a thought now and then did creep in almost without the knowledge of the author," he thank'd his stars, for he was in good luck." Were we disposed, we have not room here to discuss this subject further without excluding too much of the very valuable performance on our table, the author of which professes to supply two new portions of Mr. Wordsworth's "Recluse," one part of which, it will be recollected, was formed by "The Excursion." One of these new portions is called "The Stranger," and the other "The Flying Tailor:" they are both either dull exaggerations of peculiarities, or unhappy endeavours to be humorous, without the slightest understanding or relish of the admirable qualities of the author he tries to follow. Mr.seems to have a most acute sense for discovering singularities, which others would pass by without observation; pour les ordures il a des lumieres que les autres n'ont pas. Our readers may form a judgment of the whole by the following extract, which we assure them is the most favourable we could select. "Here then we pause-and need no farther go; Derived no genial influence from a life, To the growth of intellect, and the excursive power, A constant influence o'er his passing thoughts, For whom each special article was framed,— By musing hours of solitude supplied. Whose corporal measurement the neat-mark'd paper The performances in which Mr. Sonthey is ridiculed, are entituled "Peter of Barnet," and "The Curse of the Laureate, Carmen Judiciale.' We should like to hear our intelligent author explain the distinction he professes to have made between the productions of Mr. Wordsworth and Mr. Southey that their styles are essentially different no man can doubt, but he has not found it; and "Peter of Barnet" is just like "The Stranger," and "The Stranger" just like "Peter of Barnet." It seems quite enough for him to tell his readers, in the table of contents, that the compositions are meant to resemble the different authors, and they are to take the matter for granted. Were we to offer a piece of advice, we would recommend Mr. —, if ever his work should come to a second edition, (not a very probable supposition to be sure,) that he should transpose some of the pieces, and christen them anew. In the Carmen Judiciale, the author of "The Poetic Mirror" has with some fairness attacked the Laureate for the many boasts inserted in his Nuptial Lay, and the repeated assertions of the indestructibility of the solid fabric of his fame : all the rest of this imitation is mere trash, and consists of a dull and unintelligible personification of the various publications of Mr. Southey. He is first represented pronouncing terrible execrations against critics, and storming Heaven with prayers for their confusion. "A laugh of scorn the welkin seem'd to rend, Thou bard of honour, virtue's firmest friend,' He said, canst thou thus fret? or dost thou ween "When his o'erflowings of envenom'd spleen An undistinguish'd dunghill mass shall lie, O'er all the world shall spread thy laurell'd name.'" One of his critical opponents is delivered over by the celestial powers to the vengeance of the infuriated bard, who ascends the throne of judgment. Gladly I mounted, for before that time Merit had crown'd me with unfading bays. But when my royal laurel met his sight, He pointed with his thumb, and laugh'd with all his might. Maddening at impudence so thoroughbred, I rose from off my seat with frown severe, I shook my regal sceptre o'er his head Hear, culprit, of thy crimes, and sentence hear! Thou void of principle! of rule! of ruth! Thou renegade from nature and from truth! |