Oldalképek
PDF
ePub

THE PILGRIMS IN HOLLAND.

43

seeing it was believed of few, being only raised by the CHAP. malice of some who labored their disgrace.1

The English separatists in Holland attracted the notice of Cardinal Bentivoglio, who was the papal nuncio in that country from 1607 to 1616, though he misunderstood the cause of their leaving England, supposing it to be commerce, and not religion. He says, "I Puritani ancora vi son tolerati, che sono i più puri e più rigidi Calvinisti, i quali non vogliono riconoscere autorità alcuna ne' magistrati politici sopra il governo de' loro ministri heretici i; e sono quasi tutti de' Puritani d'Inghilterra, che per occasion di commercio frequentan

III.

1608 to

l'Ollanda, e le altre Provincie Unite. 1620. I Puritani Inglesi sono in Amsterdam quasi tutti per l'istesso rispetto; e se ne trattengono alcuni medesimamente per occasione di mercantia nella città di Midelburgo in Zelanda. Per ogni parte dunque, e da tutti gli angoli, si può dire, delle Provincie Unite, s'odono i latrati, e gli urli di tanti infetti loro settarii." Relazione di Fiandra, parte ii. cap. ii. This hardly affords ground for Bancroft's statement, that "Robinson's congregation inspired the nuncio of Rome with respect." See his History, i. 302.

CHAPTER IV.

SHOWING THE REASONS AND CAUSES OF THEIR REMOVAL.

CHAP.

IV.

AFTER they had lived in this city about eleven or twelve years, (which is the more observable, being the 1609 whole time of that famous truce between that State 1620. and the Spaniards,) and sundry of them were taken

to

away by death, and many others began to be well stricken in years, the grave mistress experience having taught them many things, these prudent governors, with sundry of the sagest members, began both deeply 1617. to apprehend their present dangers and wisely to fore

see the future, and think of timely remedy. In the agitation of their thoughts and much discourse of particulars hereabout, they began to incline to this conclusion of removal to some other place; not out of any newfangledness, or other such like giddy humor, by which men are many times transported, to their great hurt and danger, but for sundry weighty and solid

After the war had been raging for more than thirty years between Spain and the United Provinces, by the mediation of Henry IV. of France and James I. of England, a truce of twelve years was concluded on the 9th of April, 1609. See Bentivoglio, Della Guerra di

Fiandra, parte iii. lib. viii., Opere Storiche, iv. 564; Grotius, p. 542, 569; Brandt, ii. 54; Watson's Philip III. p. 275; Grattan's Netherlands, p. 226. This work of Bentivoglio should have been mentioned in the note on page 25.

THE PILGRIMS PROPOSE TO LEAVE HOLLAND.

45

reasons, the chief of which I will here recite and CHAP. briefly touch.

IV.

i. 14.

1. And first, they found and saw by experience the 1617. hardness of the place and country to be such, as few in comparison would come to them, and fewer that would bide it out and continue with them. For many that came to them, and many more that desired to be with them, could not endure the great labor and hard fare, with other inconveniences, which they underwent and were contented with. But though they loved their persons, and approved their cause, and honored their sufferings, yet they left them as it were weeping, as Orpah did her mother-in-law Naomi, or as those Ruth Romans did Cato in Utica, who desired to be excused and borne with though they could not all be Catos.1 For many, though they desired to enjoy the ordinances of God in their purity, and the liberty of the Gospel with them, yet, alas, they admitted of bondage, with danger of conscience, rather than to endure these hardships; yea, some preferred and chose prisons in England rather than this liberty in Holland, with these afflictions. But it was thought that if a better and easier place of living could be had, it would draw many and take away these discouragements; yea, their pastor would often say that many of those that both writ and preached now against them, if they were in a place where they might have liberty, and live comfortably, they would then practise as they did.

1 Plutarch says, in his Life of Cato the Younger, that the three hundred Roman citizens who were with him in Utica, intending to send messengers to Cæsar to intercede in their behalf, "implored

him to trust them and make use of
their services; but as they were no
Catos, and had not Cato's dignity
of mind, they hoped he would pity
their weakness."

46

IV.

THE REASONS FOR REMOVAL.

CHAP. 2. They saw that although the people generally bore all their difficulties very cheerfully and with a 1617. resolute courage, being in the best of their strength, yet old age began to come on some of them;1 and their great and continual labors, with other crosses and sorrows, hastened it before the time; so as it was not only probably thought, but apparently seen, that within a few years more they were in danger to scatter by necessity pressing them, or sink under their burdens, or both; and therefore, according to the divine proProv, verb, that "a wise man seeth the plague when it cometh, and hideth himself," so they, like skilful and beaten soldiers, were fearful either to be entrapped or surrounded by their enemies, so as they should neither be able to fight nor fly; and therefore thought it better to dislodge betimes to some place of better advantage and less danger, if any could be found.

xxii. 3.

3. As necessity was a taskmaster over them, so they were forced to be such not only to their servants, but in a sort to their dearest children; the which, as it did a little wound the tender hearts of many a loving father and mother, so it produced also many sad and sorrowful effects. For many of their children, that were of best dispositions and gracious inclinations, having learned to bear the yoke in their youth, and willing to bear part of their parents' burden, were oftentimes so oppressed with their heavy labors, that although their minds were free and willing, yet their bodies bowed under the weight of the same, and became decrepit in their early youth; the vigor of nature being

We know the age of but few of the Pilgrims. Carver was probably one of the oldest. In 1620,

Elder Brewster was 56 years old, Robinson 45, Bradford 32, and Edward Winslow 26.

THE REASONS FOR REMOVAL.

47

IV.

consumed in the very bud, as it were. But that CHAP. which was more lamentable, and of all sorrows most heavy to be borne, was that many of their children, by 1617. these occasions, and the great licentiousness of youth in the country, and the manifold temptations of the place, were drawn away by evil examples unto extravagant and dangerous courses, getting the reins on their necks, and departing from their parents. Some became soldiers, others took them upon far voyages by sea, and other some worse courses tending to dissoluteness and the danger of their souls, to the great grief of their parents and dishonor of God; so that they saw their posterity would be in danger to degenerate and be corrupted.

4. Lastly, (and which was not the least,) a great hope and inward zeal they had of laying some good foundation, or at least to make some way thereunto, for the propagating and advancing the Gospel of the kingdom of Christ in these remote parts of the world ; yea, though they should be but as stepping-stones unto others for performing of so great a work.

These, and some other like reasons,' moved them to

'Edward Winslow, in his Brief Narrative, mentions three other reasons; first, their desire to live under the protection of England and to retain the language and the name of Englishmen; second, their inability to give their children such an education as they had themselves received; and third, their grief at the profanation of the sabbath in Holland. This violation of the sabbath attracted the attention of the Synod of Dort, which assembled in 1618. The Dutch ministers acknowledged the great difficulty they met with in withdrawing the people on Sun

days from their sports or their or-
dinary work; and the English di-
vines took notice of the great scan-
dal which the neglect of the Lord's
Day at Dort gave them, exhorting
the Synod to interfere with the
magistrates for preventing the
opening of shops and the exercise
of trade on Sundays. Sir Dudley
Carleton, too, writing from the
Hague July 22, 1619, says, "It
falls out in these towns of Holland,
that Sunday, which is elsewhere
the day of rest, proves the day of
labor, for they never knew yet how
to observe the sabbath.' See
Brandt, iii. 28, 290; Hales's Letters

« ElőzőTovább »