Oldalképek
PDF
ePub

within the city. In 1660 a question was raised, whether the right of election for Exeter belonged to the freemen alone, cr to the freeholders and freemen together, when the House of Commons decided that it belonged to the freemen. (Vide post. p. 178.) This resolution negatives the right of the freeholders, and I have been unable to find any subsequent decision of that body in which it is recognized. But if the qualified nature of the freeholder's right as now exercised is considered, they may fairly be taken to vote as inhabitants, and not merely as freeholders; in which case, the usage which sanctions the exercise of this right would not be inconsistent with the resolution of 1660. I think this the fair construction, and therefore class Exeter with those places where the freeholders do not vote. I was led to do so at first (notwithstanding the admission in the Warwick case, v. post 405) by the uncontradicted resolution of 1660, and held the same opinion when subsequently assured of the existence of the present usage, but as pages 28 and 39 were printed off, I was unable to make this explanation among the general observations, where it would have occurred with greater propriety.

I gladly avail myself of this opportunity to offer my thanks to those gentlemen connected with the corporate counties who have afforded me assistance in this investigation; also to Mr. Jones, the clerk of elections, for granting me access to the minutes of the proceedings before the committees on contested elections.

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]
« ElőzőTovább »