Your petitioner therefore humbly prays your lordships to grant to your And your petitioner shall ever pray, &c. Form of a Respondent's Answer to an Appeal to the House of Lords. This respondent, not confessing or acknowledging all or any of the matters or things to be true, as in and by the said petition and appeal are mentioned and set forth, for answer thereunto, saith, that he believes it to be true that such decree (and subsequent orders) as are complained of, were made by the court of chancery as in the said petition and appeal are mentioned and set forth but as to the dates, substance and contents thereof, this respondent humbly craves leave to refer thereunto, when the same shall be produced; and this respondent humbly conceives and is advised that the said decrce (and subsequent orders) are agreeable to equity and justice, and therefore humbly hopes that the same shall be affirmed, and that the said petition and appeal shall be dismissed this most honourable house with costs. A LIST OF THE CASES REFERRED TO. A. ACTON v. Smith, 134. Arundel, Lord, his case, 331. Atkyns v. Hatton, 326, 427. Attorney-General. Bowles and others, Aubrey. Johnson, 207. Lucas, 121, 122, 124, 210. B. Babington's case, 283, 362. Baker and others v. Sweet, 135, 323. Barnard v. Ewens, 369. Barwell v. Coates, 203. Bateman v. Aistroppe and others, 118, 126, 136, 208. Baxter v. Knollys, 437. Bennett v. Trepass and others, 161. Bibey . Huxley, 121, 209. Blackett v. Longlands, 451.. Bluck and others v. Elliott, 166, 459. Bowman and others v. Lygon and a Brabourne v. Eyres, 135. 2 Bramston v. Heron and others, 163. Brauncewell v. Parleben, 256. Bree v. Chaplin, 168. Bree v. Dreive, 135. Cheeseman v. Hoby, 272. Chester v. Taswell, 456. Chewton, Parish of v. Parish of Comp. Breamer. Thornton and others, 166. Christian v. Wren, 136. Breary v. Manley, 177. Brereton v. Gamul, 440. Brinklow v. Edmonds, 212, 214, 216, Bristol, Dean and Ch. of v.Clarke,279. Burslem v. Burbage and others, 449. Clanricarde, Earl of v. Lady Denton, Clavil v. Oram, 189. Clement v. Fuller and Wishkard, 267. Collins v. Sir Henry Gough, 302, 466. Copley v. Collings, 284. Cornwallis v. Spurling, 153, 191. Cowley v. Keys, 184. Cowper v. Andrews, 419. 153, Cowper v. Cowper, 281. Cowper v. Layfield, 134. Croft. Ayre and Bayley, 428. D.3 Carlton v. Brightwell, 122, 124, 127, Darby v. Cosens, 292. 134, 199, 206. Carr v. Heaton, 460. Carte v. Ball, 335. Carter v. Leeds, 282. Carthew. Edwards, 133. Cartwright v. Cotton, 175. Chapman. Bishop of Lincoln and Chapman v. Hurst, 174. Chapman v. Smith, 387. Davie v. Chester, 455, 458, 460, 461. Day v. Peckwell, 348. Dickenson v. Greenhill, 192.14 Dickinson v. Read, 351. 2. Dunn Burrell and Goff, 157, 158, Charlton, Lady v. Sir Blundel Charl. Durrant v. Booty, 207, 2115.864 ton, 178, 179, 417. Charry v. Garland, $40. Chase. Ware, 269. Dutens v. Robson, 275, 290. * E. Chaytor and others v. Trinity College Egerton v. Still, 122. and others, 416. Ekins V. Dormer, 175, 302, 460. 5 cester, 283. Goddard v. Keble, 206, 421. Goodman's case, 236, 237. Hale and others v. Pronte, 380. Harpar, Sir Henry, his case, 365. Hele v. Frettendon, 364. Hett v. Meeds, 189. Hewitt v. Adams, 127, 356, 358,359. Hicks. Woodson, 195. Hill v. Vaux, 212. Hilton v. Heath, 352. Hinning. Willis, 416. Gloucester, Dean of v. Bishop of Glou- Holbecke, v. Whadcock, 323. Goodwyn v. Wortley, 420. Goold v. Jordan, 125. Graham v. Potts, 292. Grant v. Hedding and Ball, 124, 128. Greenaway. Earl of Kent, 121, 134. Holliday, . Lee, 133. Illingworth v. Leigh, 319. Lincoln, Bishop of, v. Cowper, 18+. Ingolsby, Sir William. Wevell and Lincoln, Bishop of, v. Sir Wm. Ellis another, 346. and others, 316. Lineston v. Maurice, 269. London, Bishop of and Beamont v. Lord v. Turk, 186, 187, 188. Lowther v. Bolton, 415. Jordan v. Colley and others, 136. K. Keddington v. Adamson, 174. L. Laithes and others v. Christian, 302, 463. Lambert v. Cummin, 193. Leicester, Abbot of, his case, 253. Leigh v. Wood, 271, 295, 362, |