Oldalképek
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Hickling v. Boyer

Lade v. Trill-Trill v. Lade
Watkins v. Briggs
Samuel v. Gibbs
Midgley v. Midgley
Coppin v. Gray
King v. Chuck

Weston v. Peache

Fry v. Wood

Fanning v. Devereux

and petn.

Chapman v. Bridgewater and
Taunton Navigation Co.
Fowler v. Knollys
Barker v. Wallis
Wardle v. Claxton
Hodgson v. Crozier
Ovett v. Patching
Dinning v. Henderson
Moorhouse v. Colvin

Vice Chancellor Wigram.

S. O. Lewis v. Adams, Exch. cse.
E.T.-Earl of Egremont v. Young
Abated-Neesom v. Clarkson
Abated-Owen v. Williams
Sharp v. Manson

East India Co. v. Coopers' Co.
Perkins v. Bradley, part heard
29th Jan.-Ridley v. Lashinar
Monk v. Earl Tankerville

Keene v. Birch, 2 causes, fur. dirs. S. O. G. Lloyd v. Mason, fur. dirs.

Hall v. Rawdon

Chafey v. Serjeant

& costs

Heslop v. Bank of England, ditto
Milne v. Bartlett, ditto

Sillick v. Booth-Ditto v. Cor- Fredricks v. Wilkins, ditto

bett, fur. dirs, and costs
Scarborough v. Sherman
Hooker v. Brettal
May v. Selby

Attorney Gen. v. Milner
Robertson v. Dean
Edgar v. Fry

Danks v. Otway

Alexander v. Foster, exceptions
Powell v. Powell, fur. dirs. & cs.
Abated Pye v. Linwood, ditto
Griffin v. Williams
Bowmer v. Parkinson

Ford v. Clough, fur. dirs. & costs
Gurney v. Cosway, 2 causes, ditto
Eades v. Harris

Jenkins v. Cooke

Culley v. Culley

Roach v. Peters, fur. dirs. & costs

Moody (Pauper) v. Hebberd
Gray v. Mumbray

Williams v. Roberts

Coulton v. Middleton, fur. dirs. &

equity reserved

Williams v. Moore

Williams v. Allen Vanderplank v. King Gardner v. Blane Buxton v. Simpson Greene v. Warne Appleby v. Duke Baylie v. Martin Hutchings v. Batson Wale v. Moores

Sharman v. Heath Howe v. Mattalieu v. Miller

Ditto, fur. dirs. & costs

Smith v. Baker, exons. & fur. dirs.

Massey v. Day

Forsyth v. Chard, fur. dirs. & cs.
Allen v. Cornfield
Fitzpatrick v. Newton

Mayor and Corporation of Car-Cogger v. Wickes

narvon v. Evans Allen v. Wadley Langford v. Reeves Collins v. James Compton v. Storey Fairfax v. Morrell Vickers v. Oliver Powell v. Woollam Russell v. Buchanan

Cottingham v. Stapleton, exons. Watson v. Webb

S. O. Christison v. Mayor, &c. of
Berwick, exons. 2 sets from Ex-Trevor v. Trevor, exons. 3 sets

chequer
SO. Mayor of London v. Combe,
from Exchequer
Abated-Chambers v. Middleton,

[blocks in formation]

Abated Bird v. Blyth Farmer v. Farmer Genge v. Matthews Mason v. Frankling

Scott v. Pascall

Cragg v. Forde, 2 causes, exons. 2 sets

Burridge v. Row, fur. dirs, & cs.
Carr v. Collins, fur. dirs. & costs
New Causes.

Simonds. Simonds
Oliver v. Latham

Egginton v. Burton

Stocken v. Chuck
Pullen v. Haverfield

Cash v. Belsher
Williams v. Ellis

Wright v. Rutter

Aspinall v. Andus
Morgan v. Elstob
Body v. Lefevre
Hopson v. Croome
Parry v. Jebb

Cooke v. Black

Davies v. Thorne

Middleditch v. Saunders
Hodgson v. Lowther
Wansey v. Towgood

Christian v. Chambers, fur. dirs

and costs

Eld v. Durant
Stephenson v. Everett
Barfoot v. Buckland
Stiven v. Jenkins

Dyson v. Morris

Bultell v. Lord Abinger

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Pleas and Demurrers.

1st day of Causes-Clarke v. Tipping, demurrer Matters which, in regular turn, would have been heard on a former day; but which have been adjourned at the request of Parties till after the First Day of Causes in Hilary Term.

Suckermore v. Dimes adj. to come on with sup-
plemental cause

Millar v. Craig-adj. till after Term.
Cook v. Fryer-adj. for amendment.
Warwick v. Richardson-Clarke v. Sewell ---es-

ceptions-adj. to prepare a case

Western v. Williams-further directions and adj. to Michaelmas Term

Hemmingson v. Gylby-adj. to 1st day after Term
Clunn v. Crofts-Crofts v. Davy-further directions
and costs, and supplemental suit
First day of Term-Motions

Matters which, in regular turn, would have been
heard on a former day; but which have been ad-
journed at request of Parties till the First day of
Causes in Hilary Term.

Wentworth v. Williams, par! heard
Langton v. Horton, part heard

Willats v. Bushley-Ditto v. Merceron, part heard
Relfe v. Nursey

costs-Wright v. Maunder

Wilson v. Mead-adj. to Michaelmas Term
Artis v. Artis-adj. to Easter Term
James v. James-adj. to Michaelmas Term
Hodge v. Rexworthy-Ditto v. Hodge, further di-
rections and costs, and petition part heard—adj. to |
Michaelmas Term

Jackson v. Jackson-adj. to Michaelmas Ter:n
Attorney General v. Corporation of Newcastle-upon
Tyne-adj. to Easter Term

Rutter v. Marriott-Ditto v. Ebden-adj. to Trinity
Term

Aldridge v. Westbrook-Parsons v. Same-further
directions and costs—adj. till last day of Term

Ashton v. Mc Dougall
Connell v. Connell

Hyde v. Dallaway

Leavens v. Edmondson-Ditto v. Limbert, 2 causes,
exceptions and further directions and costs
Davies v. Fisher-Ditto v. West-Ditto v. Phil-
lips, further directions and costs

Evans v. Harris

Welford v. Oliver-Ditto v. Stainthorpe
Lewis v. Davies, exceptions
Lumsden v. Morison
Lane v. Hardwicke
Attorney General v. Bayly
Shalcross v. Wright

222

Townley v. Deare

Cotham v. West, exceptions
Wyatt v. Sharratt—(April 19*)

Webb v. Tayler-(April 19)

Cause Lists, H. T., 1842.

Page v. Broom-Ditto v. Page-Ditto v. HarrisDitto v. Edwards-Ditto v. Ganderton, excep lions-set down August 13

Whittle v. Henning, exceptions-set down Aug. 14

Aldridge v. Westbrooke-Parsons v. Ditto, further Fyler v. Fyler, exceptions
directions and costs- -(May 1)
Hemmingson v. Gylby- (May 25)
Wade v. Hopkinson-(May 28)

Undisposed of Matters in the printed Book for last
Term, whose turn for Hearing had not arrived at
the close of last Sittings.

Voss v. Luce-Ditto v. Hayne-set down May 31
Story v. Tonge, exceptions—set down June 2
Ellis v. Walmsley-Ditto v. Earl Grey, further di-
rections and costs at request of defendant Walmsley
-set down June 4

Acey v. Simpson, further directions and costs, and
petition

Attorney General v. Walmsley- (June 28)-set down June 4

Attorney General v. Heron-(June 28)-set down

June 4

Attorney General v. Vincent-(June 28) Philanthropic Society v. Kemp, further dsrections and costs-set down June 9

Bowen v. Parker, further directions and costs-set down June 10

Hereford v. Ravenhill, further directions and costsset down June 10

Heighington v. Grant-Dittov. Heighington-Ditto
v. Grant, further directions and costs-set down
June 14

Agabeg v. Hartwell-Colvin v. Ditto--Hartwell v.
Colvin-(June 30)-set down June 15

De la Garde v. Lempriere, further directions and
costs, set down June 15
Strickland v. Strickland (July 5) set down

June 16

Wood v. Pattison-(July 6)-set down June 17 Attorney General v. Wilson, further directions and costs, set down June 18

Falkner v. Matthews, further directions and costs-
set down June 22

Ovenden v. Stephens-(July 8) set down June 22
Douglas v. Leake, set down June 22

Stilwell v. Clarke-Ditto (pauper) v. Hawkins-
(July 12)—set down June 25

Attorney Gen. v. Chester (Saint John's Hospital)
(July 20)-set down July 1

Wall v. Baker, further directions and costs-set down
July 3

Attorney General v. Gell, exons. fur. dirs. and costs
-set down July 6

Griffiths v. Evan, further directions and costs-set down July 10

Johnson v. Hardy-set down July 12

Hales v. Darell-Ditto v. Hales-Ditto v. Raphael
-Gilbert v. Darell-Ditto v. Raphael, further
directions and costs, and exceptions set down
July 23
Coleman v. Jessop, fur. dirs. and costs and petition
set down July 26

Ball v. Wivell, further directions and costs-set down
July 26

Attorney General v. Newbury-Ditto v. Birchall,
further directions and costs—set down July 29
Davies v. Peers, further directions and costs-Set
down August 4

Thomason v. Moses, further directions and costs-
set down August 6

Chadwick v. Broadwood, exceptions set down
August 10

The dates within parenthesis indicate the days when subpoena notes returnable.

Fyler v. Fyler, exceptions-set down August 18 Walkins v. Stevens, 4 causes-Ditto v. Cornwell, 2 causes-Ditto v. Hawkins-Judson v. Ekins, exceptions-set down August 23

Bridge v. Brown, exceptions-set down Sept. 4
Bridge v. Brown, 2 causes, further directions and
costs and exceptions-set down September 4
Nicholson v. Wathen, further directions and costs-
set down September 4

Wakeman v. Wakeman-(November 3)
Cottrell v. Gem-(November 3.)
Blachford v. Kirkpatrick-(November 3)
Wilding v. Richards-(November 3)
Wilding v. Eyton-(November 3)
Attorney General v. Compton-(November 3)
Benson v. Heathorn-(November 3)
Dowell v. Dew-(November 4)
Mann v. Mills-(November 4)
Roades v. Rosser-(November 4)
Clark v. Wormald (November 4)
Mynn v. Bart-(November 5)
Pittom v. Howard-(November 5)
Haddelsey v. Nevile-(November 5)
Shedden v. Idle-(November 5)
Sicklemore v. Kingsford-(November 5)
Padley v. Kidney (November 6)
West v. Price-(November 6)
Leman v. Oxenham-(November 6)
James v. Frearson-(November 6)
Rutherford v. Mc. Cullum-(November 6)
Stubbs v. Iveson-(November 8)
Upjohn v. Penruddocke-(November 8)
Daniel v. Harding (November 8)
Lee v. Lee (November 8)

Marquis of Westminster v. Morrison-(Nov. 8)
Wood v. Ordish-(November 8)
Viollet v. Searle-(November 11)
Drant v. Vause-(November 11)
Judson v. Ekins (November 11)
Beckett v. Thornton-(November 8)
Beckett v. Swaine-(November 8)
Prosser v. Seaborne-(November 11)
Attorney General v. Webb-(November 11)
Attorney General v; Godson—(November 11)

Undisposed of matters set down since the printing of
the book for last Term, and up to the present time
(2nd January, 1842).

Rutherford v. Mc. Cullum-(November 25)
Burton v. Burton-set down November 2
Attorney General v. Lord Carrington, exceptions→→
set down November 3

Attorney General v. Bullock-set down November 3
Iles v. Dixon, further directions and costs-set down
November 3

Morris v. Livie, further directions and costs and pe-
tition-set down November 6

Morris v. Loyd, further directions and costs and petition-set down November 6

Attorney General v. Sherman, further directions and
costs set down November 8

Fidder v. Bellingham, further directions and costs—
set down November 9
Fidder v. Brook, further directions and costs-set
down November 9

Attorney General v. Lord Carrington, further di

rections and costs-set down November 10 Hawkings v. Hawkings, 2 causes, further directions and costs-set down November 11 Davis v. Bluck-set down November 11

Cause Lists, H. T., 1842.--Sittings.

Collins v. Johnson, 2 causes, further directions and costs-set down November 13 Collins v.

Smith, further directions and costs-set down November 13

Collins v. Bennett, further directions and costs-set down November 13

Read v. Smith, further directions and costs-set down November 13

Westwood v. Slater-set down November 13 Gardner v. Gardner, further directions and costs down November 19

set

Attorney General v. Cullum, further directims and costs set down November 22

Attorney General v. Le Grice, further directions and costs set down November 22

Pettingal v. Pettingal, further directions and costs set down November 27

Jaquet v. Edwards-set down November 29 Wilcocks v. Shelley, exceptions-set down Dec. 1

Strickland v. Strickland-set down December 1 Perry (pauper) v. Walker-set down December 8 Page v. Way further directions and costs-set down December 8

Short--Kirlew v. Rayner, 2 causes, further directions and costs-December 9

Short-Hardcastle v. Cooper-set down Dec. 10 Reedhead v. Hallen, pro confesso-set down Dec. 10 Crocket v. Crocket, further directions and costs-set down December 17

Paris v. Hughes, exceptions-set down Dec. 20 Paris v. Tebbutt, exceptions-December 20 Short-Buchanan v. Mountain, further directions and costs-set down December 21 Short-Buchanan v. Goodman, further directions and costs-set down December 21 Drake v. Drake, further directions and costs-set down December 22

Lancaster v. Evors, exceptions-set down Dec. 22 Liddle v. Carden, further directions and costs-set

down December 23

Liddle v. Simpson, further directions and costs-set dowu December 23

Attorney General v. Brown, further directions and costs set down December 23

Attorney General v. Hall, further directions and costs-ret down Down December 23

Farrow v. Barlow, further directions and costs-set down December 24

Middlesex

Notts-
Hants-

Lancashire

Middlesex

Lancashire

Yorkshire

Leicester

Middlesex

Somersetshire

Warwickshire

223

Courtney d. Courtney, exceptions-December 24 Sampson v. Courtney, exceptions-December 24 Leeming v. Sherratt, further directions and costsset down December 24

Walton v. Sherratt, 2 causes, further directions and costs, set down December 24

Branch v. Primrose, 2 causes, further directions and

costs-set down December 24
Dover v. Alexander-(January 12)
Fowler v. Wood-(January 12)
Edwards v. Meyrick-(January 12)
Bower v. Cooper-(January 12)
Harvey v. Bousfield-(January 12)
Beasley v. Kenyon-(January 13)
Griffith v. Wood-(January 13)
Cooke v. Fyrer (January 13)
Attorney General v. Millard- (January 13)
Meek v. Kettlewell-(January 13)
Villebois v. Ward—(January 14)
Wilkins v. Wood-(January 14)
Smith v. Paliner-(January 14)
Havard v. Price-(January 14)
Weymouth v. Lambert-(January 14)
Paris v. Brightmore (January 14)
Morgan v. Davies-(January 15)
Hughes v. Eades-(January 15)
Waddilove v. Tayler-(January 15)
Woodhouse v. Jones-(January 15)
Rose v. Overton-(January 15)
Wood v. Ford-(January 15)
Parsons v. Millard (January 17)
Jew v. Wood-(January 17)
Cole v. Frost-(January 17)
Bonnor v. Bonnor-(January 17)
Watson v. Bentham-(January 17)
Keeton v. Lynch-(January 17)
Lewis v. Leatham-(January 18)
Piper v. Grittins-(January 18)
Trail v. Bull-(January 18)
Welford v. Bell-(January 18)
Plews v. Graham-(January 18)
Attorney General v. Pretyman-(January 19)
Attorney General v. Lewis-(January 19)
Attorney General v. Merchants Venturers Society
-(January 19)

Norton v. Pritchard-(January 19)
Thorley v. Yeats-(January 19)
Heming v. Archer-(January 19)

CROWN PAPER, Hilary Term, 1842.

-The Queen v. The Vestrymen of Marylebone.
-George Clark and another.

-The London and South Western Railway Company.
Richard Gould.

-The Inhabitants of St. Giles in the Fields.

-The Churchwardens of Liverpool.

The Inhabitants of Rishworth.

The Inhabitants of Oundle

-The Inbabitants of St. Margaret, Leicester.

-The Directors of the Poor of St. Pancras.

-The Eastern Counties Railway Company.
-The Inhabitants of Staple Fitzpaine.

-The Birmingham and Gloucester Railway Company.

CHANCERY SITTINGS, Hilary Term, 1842.

[blocks in formation]

221

AT THE ROLLS.

Sittings.-Editor's Letter Box.

solicitor on his complaining of such disallow.

Feb. 1.-Short Causes after swearing in Soli-ance, it is restored to the bill of costs by the

[blocks in formation]

master's clerk when left for the certificate. It is the duty of the copying clerk to make the report complete, without charge to the suitor, who already pays a very large sum for the report. The copying clerks, considering they have incurred none of the expenses of a legal education, receive a very handsome remuneration in the shape of a fixed salary, besides the large sums realized by them for copies.

The regulations made by the Benchers of the Middle Temple in February 1835, enabled persons who had been members for three years, during which they had kept twelve terms, to be called to the Bar. This has been rescinded, and the former regulation requiring a membership of five years is now in force.

In answer to "A Subscriber," we presume there is no difficulty in a London solicitor taking the law degrees in the London University after having gone through the proper course of study at King's or University College.

A correspondent enquires whether the solicitor of a mortgagee is entitled to charge the mortgagor for a schedule of the deeds, on paying off the mortgage.

In answer to X. Z. O., we conceive that the bill for the amendment of the law of attorneys, as regards the taking articled clerks must be prospective, and that our correspondent who states his intention of being articled to a friend who has not been admitted the full five years, will not be affected by the bill.

"Jus" states that A. devises an estate very much incumbered to B., and inquires whether B. is obliged to take the estate; and if not, what would become of the estate if he refused it ?

A correspondent inquires whether there exists any authorized list of towns and counties in themselves, (such for instance, as the county of the town of Nottingham) and small debts courts' jurisdictions? If not, he says, some officer of the courts should be obliged to furnish a memorandum of the names and limits of his jurisdiction to form a list to be exhibited at the public offices in London, or some provision of that sort ought to be made, in order that loss of time may be saved in finding out whether the residence of the debtor is or not within a supposed jurisdiction.

Town Clerks.-Doncaster, Thomas Blackwall Mason; Leeds, Edwin Eddison; Newcastle-upon-Tyne, John Clayton; Pontefract, J. Coleman; Manchester, Joseph Heron.

Perpetual Commissioner.-Isle of Wight, Mr. T. F. Cole.

The proposed improvement of the law, by allowing office copies of deeds to be given in evidence in certain cases, shall be considered.

« ElőzőTovább »