SUBJECTS OF CASES. 581 Mandamus to justices to state case-Decision Dangerous work-Employment of contractor- PRINCIPAL AND SURETY. Urban authority-Approval of plans-Amendment to resolution and plans by justices without fresh notices to owners--Jurisdiction of justices- Deposit of plans of building described otherwise than as a dwelling house-Subsequent deposit of revised plans for domestic conversion- Building used for the purposes of habitation- Prosecution-Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 55), ss. 158, 159-Public Health Acts Amendment Act 1890 (53 & 54 Vict. c. 59), Drain or sewer to take water away from quarry- Drain or sewer for profit-Vesting in local authority Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Entry on land for the purpose of the Act-Showing cause against-Court of summary jurisdiction— Evidence of sufficiency of present works- Admissibility of Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 55), ss. 36, 305.. Infectious diseases-Order of removal to hospital -Obstruction of execution of order-Proceed- ings for Power of justices to inquire into validity of order Public Health Act 1875 (38 Metropolis-General regulations by vestry as to Metropolis-Sanitary conveniences- Stables and stable-yard-"Workplace "--Persons "in attend- Public Health (London) Act 1891 (54 & 55 Vict. c. 76), s. 38 Person suffering from infectious disease-" Without Privies - Cleansing by sanitary authority--Be- coming a nuisance-Notice to owner to abate- Liability-Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 55), ss. 42, 43, 94, 95, 96 Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 55), s. 175 -Land-Compulsory purchase Sewage - Use for infectious hospital-Ultra vires.. Rates-Limit and exemption under local improve- ment Act-Limit removed by public Act-Effect on exemption-Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Riparian owner-Water right—“ Injuriously affect" -District council-Lands Clauses Consolida- tion Act 1845 (8 & 9 Vict. c. 18), s. 68-Local Government Act 1858 (21 & 22 Vict. c. 98), s. 73 -Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 55), 8. 332 Sewers Cleansing-Neglect of local authority to cleanse-Damage to adjoining premises by sewage -Liability of local authority to action for such damage-Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. Summons under Public Health (Buildings in Unsound meat-Condemnation by justice-Com- pensation by local authority-Arbitration-Duty of arbitrator-Findings of fact-Items of com- pensation-Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 55), ss. 117, 308 (See Local Government-Metropolis.) Assessment-Urban district rate-" Land covered with water"--Artificial reservoir of water com- pany-Public Health Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. Burgh-Local authority Powers -Public Health Coal mine-Gross and rateable values- Under- ground roads and airways Expenses of keeping in repair-Working expenses or "repairs "-De- duction of, from gross value-Parochial Assess- ments Act 1836 (6 & 7 Will. 4, c. 96), s. 1 Drill-hall-Not used exclusively as such-Validity Exemption Society instituted for purposes of science exclusively Manufacture and sale of scientific remedies-Annual voluntary contribu- tions--Donations Scientific Societies Act 1843 Exemption from "all taxes and assessments what- ever Subsequent taxing statute-7 Geo. 3, c. 37-City of London Sewers Act 1848 (11 & 12 Exemption of building used exclusively for educa- tion of poor--Institution to board and instruct SUBJECTS OF CASES. page 475 Gravel pits-Exhaustion of parts -Different agree- Poor rate-Change of occupation Payment of pro- Poor rate--Metropolis Quinquennial valuation- 270 359 441 444 416 Inhabited house duty-Poor law valuation-" Full RIGHT OF PASSAGE. (See Highway.) 348 698 Advance note-Engagement at foreign port- SEWER. Drainage Right to pollute watercourse-40 & 41 (See Local Government-Public Health.) SHIPPING. Engaging seamen for ships-Licence of Board of SHOP. Pageboy in hotel-Domestic servant-Shop Hours SPECIAL ACT. Prior general Act-How far latter is repealed- STREET. (See Local Government-Metropolis.) STRIKE. (See Trade Union.) 409 234 458 386 Proceedings against officers of Magisterial orders TRAMWAY. Purchase by local authority-Compulsory pur- Purchase, under special Act, before expiration of UNSOUND MEAT. (See Public Health.) URBAN AUTHORITY. 652 315 182 53 127 VAGRANCY. (See Criminal Law.) Person suffering from delirium tremens-" Wil- VESTRY. (See Local Government-Metropolis.) VOTERS, REGISTRATION OF. (See Parliament.) WATER RATE. House with rent under £10-Payment of water WATER RIGHT. (See Public Health.) WATER SUPPLY. (See Local Government.) WATERWORKS. Metropolis Fire hydrants User- Waterworks WEIGHTS AND MEASURES. Barrel used as measure No facility by local .575 200 484 621 104 265 REPORTS OF ALL THE CASES DECIDED BY All the Superior Courts RELATING TO THE LAW ADMINISTERED BY MAGISTRATES AND TO PAROCHIAL AND MUNICIPAL LAW. H. OF L.] SANDGATE URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL v. COUNTY COUNCIL OF KENT. HOUSE OF LORDS. Nov. 18, 22, 24, and 25, 1898. (Before The LORD CHANCELLOR (The Earl of Halsbury), Lords WATSON, SHAND, DAVEY, and LOPES.) SANDGATE URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL v. COUNTY COUNCIL OF KENT. (a) ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL IN ENGLAND. Highway Maintenance and Repair-Sea wallEsplanade-Works necessary for protection of road-Annual payment-Local Government Act 1888 (51 & 52 Vict. c. 41), s. 11. sub-s. 2. A local authority under an obligation to keep up a road is chargeable with the cost of works necessary for the preservation of the road, even though they may not actually form part of it, such as a sea wall and groynes necessary to prevent a road running along the sea shore from being periodically injured by inroads of the sea. The fact that a footpath along the top of such sea wall is, besides being part of the highway, used as a promenade or esplanade for the purposes of pleasure, does not affect the liability to repair. The words "annual payment towards the costs of maintenance and repair" in sect. 11, sub-sect. 2 of the Local Government Act 1888 mean a payment to be made annually in respect of the expenditure of the particular year, not a fixed sum to be arrived at by taking the average expenditure over a series of years. Judgment of the Court of Appeal reversed. THIS was an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal (Lord Esher, M.R., Smith and Rigby, L.JJ.) delivered in June 1897, who had reversed a judgment of the Divisional Court (Cave and Lawrance, JJ.) upon a case stated by an arbitrator appointed by the Local Government (a) Reported by C. E. MALDEN, Esq., Barrister-at-Law. [H. OF L. Board under sect. 11, sub-sect. 4, of the Local Government Act 1888. The case is reported below in 61 J. P. 517, and on a preliminary point not affecting the present appeal in 72 L. T. Rep. 725; (1895) 2 Q. B. 43. The appellants were the highway authority for the district of Sandgate, and in the year 1893 their predecessors, the Local Board of Sandgate, made a large claim against the respondents under sect. 11 of the Local Government Act 1888, in respect of the costs alleged to have been incurred by them during the four years ending the 25th March 1893, in the maintenance, and repair, and reasonable improvement of such part of the main road running from Folkestone to Hythe as was within their district. The part of the road referred to was within the urban district of Sandgate, and lay along the sea front and abutted upon the foreshore. The claim was repudiated by the respondents, and the difference was referred to the arbitration of the Local Government Board, and by an order of the Local Government Board under sect. 63 of the Local Government Act 1888, Mr. Thomas Codrington, a member of the Institute of Civil Engineers, was appointed to act as arbitrator. The arbitrator published his award in the form of a special case on the 1st Jan. 1897. By the award, some items of which were in favour of each party, the county council were ordered to pay 61887. to the appellants. The special case was heard by the Divisional Court on the 19th March 1897, and judgment was given on the 6th April 1897, confirming the award both as to the amount awarded to the appellants and as to the residue of the award in favour of the respondents, and the Court directed that each party should pay their own costs. Both parties appealed, and the appeals were heard together on the 24th and 25th June 1897, and judgment was given on the 25th June 1897, in favour of the respondents on both appeals, directing the arbitrator to reject the whole claim of the appellants and to award entirely in favour of the respondents. The road in question was a part of a road running from B H. OF L.] Folkestone to Hythe, and in the year 1883, when it became a main road; there was, between the carriage road and the sea, what was then, and still was known as the "Esplanade." It had been made at various times, and was of various widths. Beyond that there was a piece of land between the esplanade and the carriage road, which was laid out ornamentally and planted with shrubs. As long ago as 1867 the local board had repaired and improved it for the purposes of a promenade by regulating the width, kerbing and paving the same throughout. Throughout the entire length it was faced by a sea-wall, the outer edge of the esplanade being on the top of the sea-wall. This sea-wall had been erected at different times and under different circumstances, and besides protecting the esplanade and ornamental grounds from the inroads of the sea, it helped to protect parts of the carriage road also. SANDGATE URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL v. COUNTY COUNCIL OF Kent. Dickens, Q.C., Cunningham Glen, and Drake Brockman, for the appellants, argued that, upon the findings of the arbitrator, the decision of the Queen's Bench Division was right, and should be restored. The sea wall and groynes are found to be necessary for the support and maintenance of the road, and therefore the appellants are entitled to be repaid what they have spent upon them. "Annual payment" in sect. 11, sub-sect. 2 of the Local Government Act 1888 means a payment of the expenses incurred in each year. The cases relied on by the appellants in the court below (Reg. v. Inhabitants of Paul (2 Moo. & Rob. 307), Reg. v. Inhabitants of Bamber (5 Q. B. 279), Reg. v. Inhabitants of Hornsea (23 L. J. 59, M. C.) are not applicable, and Reg. v. Inhabitants of Greenhow (35 L. T. Rep. 363; 1 Q. B. Div. 703) is really an authority in favour of the appellants. See also Reg. v. Inhabitants of Lordsmere, 54 L. T. Rep. Improvement Commissioners of Leek v. Justices of Rex v. Inhabitants of Landulph, 1 Moo. & Rob. Reg. v. Inhabitants of High Halden, 1 F. & F. 678; Reg. v. Inhabitants of Henley, 2 Cox C. C. 334. Macmorran, Q.C. and Bray, Q.C., for the respondents, contended that the findings of the arbitrator could not be supported on the evidence. In any case the esplanade cannot be part of the road for the repair of which the respondents may be made liable. "Annual payment fixed sum annually. means a Dickens, Q.C. was not called on to reply. At the conclusion of the argument for the respondents their Lordships gave judgment as follows: The LORD CHANCELLOR (the Earl of Halsbury.)-My Lords: In this case, before I deal with the merits of the appeal, I wish to say a word or two upon the subject of the form of the award, because I think that scant justice has been done to the arbitrator in regard to the form in which this case is stated. I think, with great respect for those who think otherwise, that they have not sufficiently considered the complex nature of the problem which the arbitrator was called upon to solve. At common law all parishes were bound to repair their own roads. But when county councils were established, the duty was cast upon them of maintaining and keeping in [H. OF L. repair the main roads in their counties. To that |