should like to know what was the channel | Government for the University of Camof communication by which they were ap-bridge. He understood the noble Lord prised of the intention to close. on the woolsack would make no objection to the production of those communications, and therefore he hoped there would be no objection to his Motion on the part of their Lordships.

THE DUKE OF ARGYLL believed the Act of Parliament directed that the report of the inspector, and the recommendation of the Home Secretary, should be published and advertised in the district. tions to closing ought to be made before issuing the Order in Council; after that, it became difficult for the Home Secretary to interfere.


THE LORD CHANCELLOR said, he knew of no communications that had been addressed to the Government on the subject. Letters from four members of the late Commission, and from the Secretary of the Commission, had been addressed to him (the Lord Chancellor), and he did not see the least possible objection to produce them; but the Motion must be in the shape of a Motion for papers, and not for an Address to Her Majesty.

Papers ordered to be laid before the House.

THE BISHOP OF LONDON said, he quite agreed with the noble Earl, that the Act had been altogether carried out with too much haste, and that great public inconvenience had arisen from the operation of the Act; and he would, for the third time, call the attention of their Lordships to the great grievance that was inflicted on the metropolis by the precipitate closing of burial-grounds. He should feel it to be his duty to bring the question in a formal manner before their Lordships, and he should be able to make a statement corroborative of that made by him on a former occasion. He would be able to show that the evil of which he then complained still existed, and was increasing. Until the Government took measures to compel parishes to provide cemeteries, they were in many cases bound to order the reopen ing of the existing burial-grounds, because the mischief thereby created would not be so great as the evil at present experienced. LORD PORTMAN thought it was not quite fair to the parties interested to take a very strict view of the Act; and he would suggest that the Secretary of State should allow the inspectors to examine the vaults and burial-places of the neighbourhood in which he happened to be, so that no delay should take place when the vaults were required for interment, and parties should be spared the pain of having to overcome difficulties in obtaining access to family vaults at the moment, perhaps, when the body was prepared for interment.


THE BISHOP OF ST. DAVID'S begged leave to move an Address to Her Majesty, praying Her Majesty to order that there should be presented to their Lordships Copies of recent communications from some of the Royal Commissioners, appointed in 1850, to inquire into the State of the University of Cambridge, addressed to the First Lord of the Treasury and to the Lord Chancellor, respecting a Scheme of


"That this House will not read any Bill a Second Time after Tuesday, the 24th of July, except Bills of Aid or Supply, or any Bill in relation to which the House shall have resolved, before the Second Reading is moved, that the Circumstances which render Legislation on the subject of the same expedient are either of such recent Occurrence or Urgency as to render the immediate Consideration of the said Bill necessary." In making this Motion a second time he would shortly state what had taken place in consequence of the Resolution having been passed last year, with a view to show whether it had or had not produced the effect for which it was proposed. Many were of opinion that the regulation had had little or no effect in expediting the public business, while they thought it was recklessly departing from the constitutional course of proceeding by Parliament. Now, he thought he could show their Lordships, that although the rule had not had that full effect which hereafter might be expected from it, yet that it had last year a very considerable effect in expediting business, and that the exceptions made to the observance of the rule had been exercised with just discretion. After the Resolution was passed last year only twenty-two Bills came up from the other House requiring the application of the rule. In the preceding Session, during the same period of time, fifty-one Bills came up from the other House; this, at all events, showed that the Resolution had had some effect. Out of those twenty-two Bills, five, being Bills of aid and supply, did not come within the rule, four were stopped, and

thirteen, including five relating to the war, were passed.

VISCOUNT CANNING, on the part of the Government, expressed his entire concurrence in the Resolution.

Resolution agreed to.

the loan just effected by the Chancellor of the Exchequer bore favourable comparison with the loan of 1835. The circumstances of the two loans were, however, different in some important respects, fully sufficient in themselves to account for the slight difference in result. In 1835 we were at peace; we now were at war. We had then no income tax, which now told with such weight on the annuities in which the biddings were taken; we had now an income tax of a heavy amount. Then there was a discount allowed; now there was no discount sought for or granted. Therefore the Chancellor of the Exchequer of the present day was placed at certain disadvantages as compared with the Chancellor of the Exchequer of 1835; and yet, with all these disadvantages, the terms of the present loan were nearly as favourable to the public as were those of the loan of 1835, which Mr. Finlaison had so warmly eulogised. He (Lord Monteagle) considered that this loan reflected the greatest credit on the Chancellor of the Exchequer. He made his loan, and frankly avowed that he made it. It had been argued most ignorantly and most absurdly that the plan of contracting the loan partly in three per cent stock and partly in terminable annuities was objectionable as an innovation. Nothing could be more untrue. He would remind their Lordships that not only did the loan of 1835 afford a precedent, but twelve of the most memorable loans of Mr. Pitt had been contracted on the same principle; indeed, he (Lord Monteagle) considered that the introduction into the loan of the principle of terminable annuities was the only secure mode of establishing a sinking fund, and that was the course taken by himself in 1835, and now very wisely adopted by the present Chancellor of the Exchequer. But, while he approved the main conditions of the loan, he must reluctantly observe that this Bill contained one clause which was not a necessary part of the loan, and which formed no part of the contract made by the right hon. Gentleman. It was, therefore, open to discussion. That clause was intended to provide for a future extinction of the debt of 16,000,000l. now created, by pledging Parliament to an issue from the Consolidated Fund of 1,000,000l. sterling annually, the first instalment of which was to commence from the termination of the war with Russia, and which was to continue for sixteen years successively. This clause contained within itself almost every vicious


Bill read 3a (according to Order). Moved, That the Bill do now pass. LORD MONTEAGLE said, as he was fully sensible that this was a Bill which ought not to be delayed, he was reluctant to throw any obstacle in the way of the third reading. He knew there was a considerable sum of loan deposits lying unproductive in the Bank of England, whilst an increased charge was made against the public money advanced on deficiency bills. He would, therefore, content himself with calling the attention of their Lordships to some peculiarities in this Bill, before they gave their sanction to it, as it involved a principle which admitted of considerable doubt. He did not mean that the principle on which this loan was contracted was one for which the public had the slightest ground of complaint, unless, perhaps, that the amount raised by terminable annuities had not been carried further. He thought the conditions laid down by the Chancellor of the Exchequer were wise and sound, and he also admitted, that he believed the terms of the contract were equitable to all parties, and at the same time advantageous to the public. He was the last person disposed or entitled to controvert this, for in 1835 a loan very similar in character was contracted by himself in Lord Melbourne's Government, for the purpose of compensating the owners of slaves in the Colonies. The circumstances of both loans were nearly identical. The bulk of the sum borrowed was in 3 per cents, the biddings were in an annuity; and the price of the funds in 1835 only differed from their present rate by 5s. per cent, and the terms of the contract of 1835 were but in a slight degree more favourable than the present. The terms of that loan were questioned in the House of Commons, by the late Mr. Hume. The Government agreed that the matter should be referred to the decision of the most eminent scientific men; that course was taken, and the judgment of Mr. Finlaison laid before Parliament, pronounced, absolutely, that the loan of 1835 was one of the most advantageous to the country ever contracted. It is, therefore, satisfactory to find that

principle of the old sinking fund, against | inviolate a sufficient time to produce the which every authority for the last thirty good results that had been expected. It was years protested, and it involved an error first established in 1716; but Sir Robert peculiar to itself, and which was much Walpole detected the folly of a process of more objectionable in the old Sinking Fund paying off debt when carried on contemAct. This prospective engagement as- poraneously with a borrowing, and he sumed that there would either be a surplus wisely put an end to it. So it rested till revenue of 1,000,000l. a year, or that 1786, when Dr. Price, a man of science, Parliament would be justified in adding in communication with Mr. Pitt, struck 1,000,000l. a year to the taxation of the out the notion of paying the debt with borcountry, in order to provide 1,000,000l. rowed money, and calculated that by the annually to apply to the reduction of the aid of compound interest the debt would be debt just contracted. The only third al- cleared off in some inconceivably short ternative was that of a new loan, or in time. The world was dazzled by Dr. other words, the old folly of paying debt Price and his golden globes, as well with borrowed money. All experience as by the eloquence of Mr. Pitt. The proved that these prospective engage- system continued until 1825, when it was ments could not be relied on. The Go- found that even the diminished payment vernment had only last year entered into of 5,000,000l. per annum by the sinkan engagement to pay off the 1,750,000l. ing fund produced no adequate public of Exchequer bills promised to be made good. Parliament then applied 3,000,0001. good out of the revenue of the year; but as a sinking fund, but this was dealt before that year had elapsed the Govern- with in precisely the same manner as ment had been obliged to ask Parliament the 5,000,000l. had previously been. It to depart from this engagement. But in broke down, and was considered to be abthe teeth of this our latest experience we surd, unless where it was based on a real are called on to assume that at the conclu- surplus. In 1828 a Committee fully consion of the war there would be 1,000,000l. sidered this question, and the principle a year available for the repayment of this adopted appeared reasonable, which was loan: this is an hypothesis, not only im- that the sinking fund to be applied in reprobable, but almost incredible. It should demption of the debt was to be arrived at by be remembered that war was not only a a calculation of the excess of the revenue very expensive operation in itself, but that over the expenditure, which excess was to when it was brought to a close there were be applied as a sinking fund to extinguish always heavy bills to pay, ships to be paid debt. But there had been as many violaoff, retired allowances to provide, and thus, tions of the sinking fund after that enactin short, that the close of war was even ment as there had been before. The course more expensive than the war itself. Sup- taken had been to contract a debt with the pose, then, that no surplus existed, and Bank for deficiency bills payable out of the that Parliament were unwilling to increase current revenue, but under the general taxation, if money should have been bor- terms of the Sinking Fund Act, that fund rowed in time of war, and that at its ter- had been applied not to the extinction of mination money should have to be bor- the permanent debt contracted, but to the rowed for the purpose of paying off the discharge of these temporary advances. debt, that would be recurring to one of the The result of this operation was simply to most exploded blunders in finance-that increase the Exchequer balances, and then of paying off debt with borrowed money. to use the sinking fund, not in diminution But this is not all. We should remem- of debt, but in providing Ways and Means ber that our income tax, our malt tax, for the services of the year. That might are only temporary, and will cease or di- have been very wise, but it was inconminish with a return of peace. There sistent with the principles of the sinking fore, we are putting an additional burden fund. He had shown their Lordships of 1,000,000l. annually on a lessening that during a century and a half in no revenue. It may be further asked, who one instance was the sinking fund to be will place confidence in sinking funds? relied on; and he would refer them to a What had been their past experience? high authority on this subject, Lord GrenWere the statesmen of the present day to ville, who, as the colleague and friend of be more depended on than the statesmen Mr. Pitt during all his sinking fund opeof fifty years ago? The fact was that the rations, was not very likely to have lightly sinking fund had never been preserved condemned the system which Mr. Pitt advoVOL. CXXXVIII. [THIRD SERIES.]


account from day to day, not with the account actually due and payable, but with so much only as it was calculated might be necessary to meet the demands likely to be made within the day. A more pitiful and trumpery remedy he could not well conceive, and he therefore regretted that Clause 9 was introduced into the present Bill.

THE DUKE OF ARGYLL said, that in the absence of his noble Friend who represented the Government in that House, he rose to protest against the harsh observations of the noble Lord with regard to the course pursued by his right hon. Friend the late Chancellor of the Exchequer in

cated to the last day of his life; but the | his duty to object to Clause 9, which had noble Lord had, in one of the most able reference to a practice lately introduced to and scientific essays in the language, provide for the payment of the dividends of avowed his departure from the principles the National Debt. Till the April quarter which he himself had once advocated, and in 1854, as much money was raised at the which had guided Mr. Pitt in his sinking Bank of England by the deposit of defifund operations. As he himself informs ciency bills as would suffice to pay the us, years had brought with them know- whole of the dividends, even if the whole ledge, and being convinced of his former were lemanded when due in one single error, he had no reluctance or hesitation in day. In April 1854, an innovation was inacknowledging it. It was with all this ex- troduced, wishing to inforce an antecedent perience and these authorities before them practice, and one not very creditable in itthat they were now called upon to adopt a self-namely, a system of feeding the pubprinciple which had, during the last twenty-lic five years, been repudiated by every authority that had dealt with this question. He had heard it said that there was nothing in the clause which was compulsory on Parliament with reference to the obligation of providing a sinking fund of 1,000,000l. annually. He did not so read the Act. He considered that the clause created the same obligation with respect to this Motion as there already existed in respect to the whole debt, except that the payment of the sinking fund of 1,000,0001. was made contingent on the close of the war. But was it wise or just that there should be nothing definite as to this point as it was argued? Did it add to the pub-reference to deficiency bills. So far from lic credit of England? He thought other- that course being a paltry one, or being wise; for if the question was brought before unworthy, as the noble Lord had characParliament at the close of the war, and if terised it, it was, he thought, the course this 1,000,000l. were not provided for he which his right hon. Friend was bound to considered that the effect of it would be to take. His right hon. Friend found that injure the public credit of the country. He the public were paying interest upon ad(Lord Monteagle) did not mean to propose vances of a purely nominal characterany amendment, or to call on the House advances which had reduced many Memto leave out the clause, because it would bers of Parliament, and perhaps the noble endanger the Bill if any amendment werd Lord himself, to use on some occasions made, and he did not feel justified in run-arguments as fallacious as the advances ning any such risk, however much he de- themselves. He believed that his noble plored the error into which he considered Friend the President of the Council had Parliament to have fallen; but he hoped he on a previous occasion been asked whether had shown to their Lordships that there the opinion of the law officers of the Crown were sufficient reasons for doubting the had been taken as to the course pursued policy of the principle embodied in the by the late Chancellor of the Exchequer, clause. He believed that it would not and the reply was that so far from their really act as a security for the redemption thinking that the clause bore the interpreof the loan, whilst it was likely to prejudice tation that the noble Lord had put upon the public credit. When the time came, if it, their opinion was clear that the course there were a surplus income of 1,000,000l., adopted by his right hon. Friend was jusit might be applied in reduction of the debt. tifiable, and in strict accordance with the This, indeed, must take place without this spirit and intention of the Act of Parliaclause and under the general law. But ment. should there not be a surplus, it would be a monstrous absurdity, such as Lord Grenville had exposed, to go on borrowing money in order to make up a sum to extinguish this loan. Before sitting down, he felt it

THE EARL OF STRADBROKE said, it was his misfortune to disapprove both of the manner in which this loan had been raised, and of the mode in which every loan had been raised for the service of the

State for the last half century. He believed that if a different mode had been adopted, the national debt, instead of being 800,000,000l., would not have been half that sum. He hoped, when future loans were raised, some different system would be adopted, and means would be taken to try if loans could not be raised on easier terms for the nation. On the day upon which the present loan was effected Consols were at 90; consequently every 100l. would realise 31. 16s. 8d. per annum. By the bargain made the country would have to pay 31. 148. 6d. for thirty years-that is to say, for every 100l. there would be 31. per annum, and 14s. 6d. would be guaranteed for thirty years. He did not doubt that if Ministers had proposed three and a half per cent stock the 16,000,000l. | would have been raised in a week. There would have been ample and sufficient bonus to induce the public to subscribe, and the result would have been that in a few years the opportunity would have offered of reducing the stock to three per cent. Instead of that, however, we were bound to pay a premium of 14s. 6d. for thirty years. There was another objection to the proposed measure, that the interest was to count from the 5th January last; so that, although some of the money would not be advanced until July, and some not until December next, on the 5th January, 1856, a year's interest would be due. This was unnecessary and unjustifiable. A most unwise arrangement had been made, and he repeated that he hoped on future occasions an attempt would be made, by a better system, to obtain easier terms.

ciple of terminable annuities, it was decided, after mature and careful deliberation on the part of Her Majesty's Government, that the difference between 1007. money and 1001. stock should be compensated by a terminable annuity, and that the loan should be reduced by annual payments of 1,000,000l., commencing with the close of the present war. There could be no doubt whatever but that at the close of the war this sum of 1,000,000l. could be very easily raised, and if any season of reverse should occur it would be perfectly competent for Parliament to repeal this clause. He thought that this provision was entitled to the approbation of their Lordships, as it recognised the principle of the redemption of debt, and decided that the present generation ought not to burden posterity with an unlimited amount of debt.

LORD STANLEY OF ALDERLEY was glad to hear the opinion expressed by the noble Lord (Lord Monteagle) that the terms upon which the loan had been raised were exceedingly favourable, and he was also gratified to hear the opinion expressed that the best mode of raising money was by means of terminable annuities. It was felt, however, in deciding upon this loan, that it would not be possible to raise so large a sum as 16,000,000l. by terminable annuities. But between terminable annuities and the establishment of a sinking fund there was in effect little or no difference. In the case of the sinking fund the present generation was called upon to pay a larger sum each year in order to reduce the principal of the debt, and terminible annuities involved the action of precisely the same principle. In order to give effect as far as possible to the prin

EARL GREY fully concurred in the opinion that an effort should be made to get rid in a limited period of a debt incurred in time of war, but while fully concurring in that opinion, he could not agree with the noble Lord in thinking that there were no objections to the clause which had been referred to by his noble Friend behind him (Lord Monteagle). His noble Friend had stated that the insertion of that clause was a retrograde step in the financial policy of this country, and he quite agreed with that opinion. They were going back exactly to their former situation under Acts of Parliament which required that sinking funds, first of 5,000,000l., and afterwards of 3,000,000l., should be established. The operation of this principle was most carefully considered by a Committee of the House of Commons in 1828, of which he (Earl Grey) was a Member; and that Committee, after a most careful consideration, agreed to an able report, prepared by the late Mr. Herries, which stated that in the opinion of the Committee the principle of setting apart a fixed sum every year as a sinking fund was a vicious one. The report showed clearly that the effect of the system was to incur the risk of having to borrow with one hand, while they were paying off with the other. If they made a provision binding the Chancellor of the Exchequer to pay off 1,000,000l. a year whether he had the money or not, they drove him to the course of paying the money, but at the same time borrowing from the Bank in the shape of deficiency bills; or, in other words, he would have to pay with one hand while he borrowed with the other.

« ElőzőTovább »