Page 4, line 12, for "33 & 34 Vict., c. 103," read "33 & 34 Vict. c. 109." 16, for "post, in the Appendix," read "post, p. 368."
36, add-It has however been held in Kelly v. Dixon (Q. B., M. T., 1870, not yet reported), that the Court has jurisdiction under the above section to allow a defendant out of the jurisdiction to be served with the writ of summons and plaint, through the post office or otherwise, even in cases where the defendant has no agent resident within the jurisdiction.
9, 10, for "post, in the Appendix," read "post, p. 368." 29, for "27," read "207."
14, add:-In Long v. Mooney (Ex. T. T. 1871, not yet reported), the executors of a deceased plaintiff having obtained a conditional order for leave to enter a suggestion under the above section, which order was duly made absolute, filed the suggestion, and marked judgment without serving the defendant with a copy of the suggestion or notice of filing; and the Court on a motion to set aside the judgment for irregularity held that the judgment was regularly marked.
10, for "verdict," read "judgment."
15, for "one several," read "one of several."
10 from bottom, for "suggestion," read "question."
4 from bottom, for "partly," read "party."
13, add-In Kenna v. Connor (C. P. T. T. 1871, not yet reported), the party ap- pealing having delayed in furnishing the case for appeal, after having given bail, the Court made an order requiring him to state the case within twelve days. 5, add:-Where, after an order to attach a debt due to the defendant had been obtained, but before an order to pay was made, the plaintiff issued a ca. sa. under which the defendant was arrested, it was held, per Keogh, J., that the ca. sa. was regular, and a motion to discharge the defendant was therefore refused (Speer v. Brennan, C. C. T. V. 1871, not yet reported).
6, add:-L. R. 6 Ex. 35.
8 from bottom, for "31st," read "38th."
« ElőzőTovább » |