similar declaration, as an apology for so repeatedly treating on the important topics of religion

and morals

Abashed by the equitable precept,

Let those teach others who themselves excel

she is aware, how fairly she is putting it in the power of the reader, to ask, in the searching words of an eminent old prelate, They that speak thus, and advise thus, do they do thus ?' She can defend herself in no other way, than by adopting for a reply the words of the same venerable divine, which immediately follow-O that it were not too true. Yet although it be but little that is attained, the very aim is right, and something there is that is done by it. It is better to have such thoughts and desires, than altogether to give them up; and the very desire, if it be serious and sincere, may so much change the habitude of the soul and life, that it is not to bc despised.'

The world does not require so much to be informed as reminded. A remembrancer may be almost as useful as an instructor; if his office be more humble, it is scarcely less necessary. The man whose employment it was, statedly to proclaim in the ear of Philip, REMEMBER THAT THOƯ ART MORTAL, had his plain admonition been allowed to make its due impression, might have produced a more salutary effect on the royal usurper, than the impassioned orations of his immortal assailant

whose resistless eloquence

Shook th' arsenal and fulmined over Greece

To Macedon and Artaxerxes' throne.

While the orator boldly strove to check the ambition, and arrest the injustice of the king, the simple herald barely reminded him, how short would be the reign of injustice, how inevitable and how near was the final period of ambition. Let it be remembered to the credit of the monarch, that while the thunders of the politician were intolerable, the monitor was of his own ap pointment.

This slight sketch, for it pretends to no higher name, aims only at being plain and practical. Contending solely for those indispensable points, which by involving present duty, involve future happiness, the writer has avoided, as far as Christian sincerity permits, all controverted topics; has shunned whatever might lead to disputation rather than to profit.

We live in an age, when, as Mr. Pope observed of that in which he wrote, it is criminal to be moderate. Would it could not be said that Religion has her parties as well as politics! Those who endeavour to steer clear of all extremes in either, are in danger of being reprobated by both. It is rather a hardship for persons, who have considered it as a Christian duty to cultivate a spirit of moderation in thinking, and of candour in judging, that, when these dispositions are brought into action, they frequently incur a harsher censure than the errors which it was their chief aim

to avoid.

Perhaps, therefore, to that human wisdom whose leading object is human applause, it might answer best to be exclusively attached to some one party. On the protection of that party at least, it might in that case reckon; and it would then have this dislike of the opposite class alone to contend against; while those who cannot go all lengths with either, can hardly escape the dis approbation of both.

To apply the remark to the present case :-The author is apprehensive that she may at once be censured by opposite classes of readers, as being too strict and too relaxed :—too much attached to opinions, and too indifferent about them ;-as having narrowed the broad field of Christianity by labouring to establish its peculiar doctrines;—as having broken down its enclosures by not confining herself to doctrines exclusively;-as having considered morality of too little importance; as having raised it to an undue elevation;-as having made practice every thing;—as having made it nothing.

While a catholic spirit is accused of being latitudinarian in one party, it really is so in another. In one it exhibits the character of Christianity on her own grand but correct scale; in the other, it is the offspring of that indifference, which, considering all opinions as nearly of the same value, indemnifies itself for tolerating all, by not attaching itself to any, which, establishing a self-complacent notion of general benevolence, with a view to discredit the narrow spirit of Christianity, and adopting a display of that cheap material, liberal sentiment, as opposed to religious strictness, sacrifices true piety to false candour.

Christianity may be said to suffer between two criminals, but it is difficult to determine by which she suffers most ;-whether by that uncharitable bigotry which disguises her divine cha. racter, and speculatively adopts the faggot and the flames of inquisitorial intolerance; or by that indiscriminate candour, that conceding slackness, which, by stripping her of her appropriate attributes, reduces her to something scarcely worth contending for; to something which, instead of making her the religion of Christ, generalizes her into any religion which may choose to adopt her. The one distorts her lovely lineaments into caricature, and throws her graceful figure into gloomy shadow; the other, by daubing her over with colours not her own, renders her form in distinct, and obliterates her features. In the first instance, she excites little affection; in the lat ter she is not recognized.

The writer has endeavoured to address herself as a Christian who must die soon, to Christians

who must die certainly. She trusts that she shall not be accused of erecting herself into a cen
sor, but be considered as one who writes with a real consciousness that she is far from having
reached the attainments she suggests; with a heartfelt conviction of the danger of holding out a
standard too likely to discredit her own practice. She writes not with the assumption of superi-
ority, but with a deep practical sense of the infirmities against which she has presumed to cau-
tion others. She wishes to be understood as speaking the language of sympathy, rather than of
dictation; of feeling rather than of document. So far from fancying herself exempt from the
evils on which she has animadverted, her very feeling of those evils has assisted her in their de-
lineation. Thus this interior sentiment of her own deficiencies, which might be urged as a dis-
qualification, has, she trusts, enabled her to point out dangers to others.-If the patient cannot
lay down rules for the cure of a reigning disease, much less effect the cure; yet from the symp-
toms common to the same malady, he who labours under it may suggest the necessity of attend-
ing to it.
He may treat the case feelingly, if not scientifically. He may substitute experience,
in default of skill: he may insist on the value of the remedy he has neglected, as well as recom-
mend that from which he has found benefit.

The subjects considered in this treatise have been animadverted on, have been in a manner exhausted, by persons before whose names the author bows down with the deepest humility; by able professional instructors, by piety adorned with all the graces of style, and invigorated with all the powers of argument.

Why, then, it may be asked, multiply books which may rather incumber the reader than strengthen the cause? That the older is better,' cannot be disputed. But is not the being 'old' sometimes the reason why the 'better' is not regarded? Novelty itself is an attraction which but too often supersedes merit. A slighter drapery, if it be a new one, may excite a degree of attention to an object, not paid to it when clad in a richer garb to which the eye has been accustomed.

The author may begin to ask with one of her earliest and most enlightened friends*- Where is the world into which we were born?' Death has broken most of those connexions which made the honour and happiness of her youthful days. Fresh links however have continued to attach her to society. She is singularly happy in the affectionate regard of a great number of amiable young persons, who may peruse with additional attention, sentiments which come recommended to them by the warmth of their own attachment, more than by any claim of merit in the writers Is there not something in personal knowledge, something in the feelings of endeared acquaintance, which by that hidden association, whence so much of our undefined pleasure is derived, if it does not impart new force to old truths, may excite a new interest in considering truths which are known? Her concern for these engaging persons extends beyond the transient period of present intercourse. It would shed a ray of brightness on her parting hour, if she could hope that any caution here held out, any principle here suggested, any habit here recommended, might be of use to any one of them; when the hand which now guides the pen, can be no longer exerted in their service. This would be remembering their friend in a way which would evince the highest affection in them, which would confer the truest honour on herself. Barley Wood, March 1st, 1811.

PRACTICAL PIETY,

OR THE INFLUENCE OF THE RELIGION OF THE HEART ON THE CONDUCT OF THE LIFE.

CHAP. I.

Christianity an internal principle.

CHRISTIANITY bears all the marks of a divine original. It came down from heaven, and its gracious purpose is to carry us up thither. Its Author is God. It was foretold from the beginning, by prophecies which grew clearer and brighter as they approached the period of their accomplishment. It was confirmed by miracles which continued till the religion they illustrated was established. It was ratified by the blood of its author. Its doctrines are pure, sublime, consistent. Its precepts just and holy. Its worship is spiritual. Its services reasonable, and rendered practicable by offers of divine aid to human weakness. It is sanctioned by the eternal happiness of the faithful, and the everlasting misery to the disobedient. It had no collusion with

power, for power sought to crush it. It could not be in any league with the world, for it set out by declaring itself the enemy of the world. It reprobated its maxims, it showed the vanity of its glories, the danger of its riches, the emp tiness of its pleasures.

Christianity though the most perfect rule of life that ever was devised, is far from being barely a rule of life. A religion consisting of a mere code of laws, might have sufficed for a man in a state of innocence. But man who has broken these laws cannot be saved by a rule which he has violated. What consolation could he find in the perusal of statutes, every one of which, bringing a fresh conviction of his guilt, brings a fresh assurance of his condemnation The chief object of the Gospel is not to furnish rules for the preservation of innocence, but to hold out the means of salvation to the guilty. It

does not proceed from a supposition but a fact;
not upon what might have suited man in a state
of purity, but upon what is suitable to him in
the exigences of his fallen state.

in the place of those shadows which he has been pursuing. It presents this world as a scene of whose original beauty Sin has darkened and disordered, Man as a dependant creature, Jesus This religion does not consist in an external Christ as the repairer of all the evils which sin conformity to practices, which, though right in has caused, and as our restorer to holiness and themselves, may be adopted from human mo- happiness. Any religion short of this, any at tives, and to answer secular purposes. It is not least, which has not this for its end and object, a religion of forms, and modes, and decencies. is not that religion, which the Gospel has preIt is being transformed into the image of sented to us, which our Redeemer came down God. It is being like-minded with Christ. It on earth to teach us by his precepts, to illusis considering him as our sanctification, as trate by his example, to confirm by his death, well as our redemption. It is endeavouring to and to consummate by his resurrection. live to him here that we may live with him hereafter. It is desiring earnestly to surrender our will to his, our heart to the conduct of his Spirit, our life to the guidance of his word.

The change in the human heart, which the Scriptures declare to be necessary, they represent to be not so much an old principle improved, as a new one created; not educed out of the former character, but infused into the new one. T'his change is there expressed in great varieties of language, and under different figures of speech. Its being so frequently described, or figuratively intimated in almost every part of the volume of inspiration, entitles the doctrine itself to reverence, and ought to shield from obloquy the obnoxious terms in which it is sometimes conveyed.

If Christianity do not always produce these happy effects to the extent here represented, it If we has always a tendency to produce them. do not see the progress to be such as the Gospel annexes to the transforming power of true religion, it is not owing to any defect in the principle, but to the remains of sin in the heart; to the imperfectly subdued corruptions of the Christian. Those who are very sincere are still very imperfect. They evidence their sincerity by acknowledging the lowness of their attainments, by lamenting the remainder of their corruptions. Many an humble Christian whom the world reproaches with being extravagant in his zeal, whom it ridicules for being enthusiastic in his aims, and rigid in his practice, is inwardly mourning on the very contrary ground. He would bear their censure more cheerfully, but that he feels his danger lies in the opposite direction. He is secretly abasing himself before his Maker for not carrying far enough that principle which he is accused of carrying too far. The fault which others find in him is excess. The fault he finds in himself is deficiency. He is, alas! too commonly right. His enemies speak of him as they hear. He judges of himself as he feels. But though humbled to the dust by the deep sense of his own unworthiness, he is, strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.' 'He has,' says the venerable Hooker, a Shepherd full of kindness, full of care, and full of power. His prayer is not for reward but pardon. His plea is not merit but mercy; but then it is mercy made sure to him by the promise of the Almighty to penitent believers.

The sacred writings frequently point out the analogy between natural and spiritual things. The same Spirit which in the creation of the world moved upon the face of the waters, operates on the human character to produce a new heart and a new life. By this operation the affections and faculties of the man receive a new impulse-his dark understanding is illu. minated, his rebellious will is subdued, his irregular desires are rectified, his judgment is informed, his imagination is chastised, his inelinations are sanctified; his hopes and fears are directed to their true and adequate end. Heaven becomes the object of his hopes, an eternal separation from God the object of his fears. His love of the world is transmuted into the love of God. The lower faculties are pressed into the new service. The senses have a higher direction. The whole internal frame and constitution receive a nobler bent; the intents and purposes of the mind a sublimer aim; his aspirations a loftier flight; his vacillating desires find a fixed object; his vagrant purposes a settled home; his disappointed heart a certain refuge. The heart, no longer a worshipper of the world, is struggling to become 'its conqueror. Our blessed Redeemer, in overcoming the world, bequeathed us his com- But genuine Christianity can never be graftmand to overcome it also: but as he did noted on any other stock than the apostacy of man. give the command without the example, so he did not give the example without the offer of a power to obey the command.

Genuine religion demands not merely an external profession of our allegiance to God, but an inward devotedness of ourselves to his service. It is not a recognition, but a dedication. It puts the Christian into a new state of things, a new condition of being. It raises him above the world while he lives in it. It disperses the illusion of sense, by opening his eyes to realities

The mistake of many in religion appears to be, that they do not begin with the beginning. They do not lay their foundation in the persuasion that man is by nature in a state of aliena tion from God. They consider him rather as an imperfect than a fallen creature. They allow that he requires to be improved, but deny that he requires a thorough renovation of heart.

The design to reinstate beings who have not fallen; to propose a restoration without a previous loss, a cure where there was no radical disease, is altogether an incongruity which would seem too palpable to require confutation, did we not so frequently see the doctrine of redemption maintained by those who deny that man was in a state to require such a redemption.. But would Christ have been sent to preach deliverence to the captive,' if there had been no captivity; and the opening of the prison to

them that were bound,' had there been no prison, had man been in no bondage?

We are aware that many consider the doctrine in question as a bold charge against our Creator. But But may we not venture to ask, Is it not a bolder charge against God's goodness to presume that he had made beings originally wicked; and against God's veracity to believe, that having made such beings he pronounced them 'good?" İs not that doctrine more reasonable which is expressed or implied in every part of Scripture, that the moral corruption of our first parent has been entailed on his whole posterity; that from this corruption (though only punishable for their actual offences) they are no more exempt than from natural death?

We must not, however, think falsely of our nature; we must humble but not degrade it. Our original brightness is obscured, but not extinguished. If we consider ourselves in our natural state, our estimation cannot be too low: when we reflect at what a price we have been bought, we can hardly overrate ourselves in the view of immortality.

the sound and sober exercises of genuine piety. They seize every occasion to represent it as if it were criminal, as the foe of morality; ridiculous as the infallible test of an unsound mind; mischievous, as hostile to active virtue, and destructive as the bane of public utility.

;

But if these charges be really well founded; then were the brightest luminaries of the Christian church-then were Horne, and Porteus; and Beveridge; then were Hooker, and Taylor, and Herbert; Hopkins, Leighton, and Usher Howe, and Baxter; Ridley, Jewel, and Hooper then were Chrysostome and Augustine, the reformers and the fathers; then were the goodly fellowship of the prophets; then were the noble army of martyrs; then were the glorious company of the apostles; then was the disciple whom Jesus loved; then was Jesus himselfI shudder at the amplification-dry speculatists, frantic enthusiasts, enemies to virtue, and sub: verters of the public weal.

Those who disbelieve, or deride, or reject this inward religion, are much to be compassionated. Their belief that no such principle exists, will, it is to be feared, effectually prevent its existing in themselves, at least, while they make their own state the measure of their gene. ral judgment. Not being sensible of their required dispositions in their own hearts, they establish this as a proof of its impossibility in all cases: This persuasion, as long as they maintain it, will assuredly exclude the reception of divine truth. What they assert can be true in no case, cannot be true in their own. Their hearts will be barred against any influence in the power of which they do not believe. They will not desire it, they will not pray for it, except in the Liturgy, where it is the decided lans

If, indeed, the Almighty had left us to the consequences of our natural state, we might, with more colour of reason, have mutinied against his justice. But when we see how graciously he has turned our very lapse into an occasion of improving our condition; how from this evil he was pleased to advance us to a greater good than we had lost; how that life which was forfeited may be restored; how by grafting the redemption of man on the very circumstance of his fall, he has raised him to the capacity of a higher condition than that which he has forfeited, and to a happiness superior to that from which he fell-What an impression does this give us of the immeasurable wisdomguage: They will not addict themselves to and goodness of God, of the unsearchable riches of Christ.

those pious exercises to which it invites them, exercises which it ever loves and cherishes. Thus they expect the end, but avoid the way which leads to it; they indulge the hope of glory, while they neglect or pervert the means of grace. But let not the formal religionist, who has probably never sought, and therefore never obtained, any sense of the spiritual mercies of God, conclude that there is, therefore, no such state. His having no conception of it is no more proof that no such state exists, than it is a proof, that the cheering beams of a genial climate have no existence, because the inhabitants of the frozen zone never felt them.

The religion which it is the object of these pages to recommend, has been sometimes misunderstood, and not seldom misrepresented. It has been described as an unproductive theory, and ridiculed as a fanciful extravagance. For the sake of distinction it is here called, The religion of the Heart.-There it subsists as the fountain of spiritual life; thence it sends forth, as from the central seat of its existence, supplies of life and warmth through the whole frame; there is the soul of virtue; there is the vital principle which animates the whole being of a Christian. This religion has been the support and con- Where our own heart and experience do not solation of the pious believer in all ages of the illustrate these truths practically, so as to afford church. That it has been perverted both by the us some evidence of their reality, let us examine cloistered and the uncloistered mystic, not our minds, and faithfully follow up our convicmerely to promote abstraction of mind, but in- tions; let us inquire whether God has really activity of life, makes nothing against the prin- been wanting in the accomplishment of his prociple itself. What doctrine of the New Testa-mises, or whether we have not been sadly dement has not been made to speak the language of its injudicious advocate, and turned into arms against some other doctrines which it was never meant to oppose ?

ficient in yielding to those suggestions of conscience which are the motions of his Spirit Whether we have not neglected to implore the aids of that Spirit; whether we have not, in But if it has been carried to a blameable excess various instances, resisted them? Let us ask by the pious error of holy men, it has also been ourselves-have we looked up to our heavenly adopted by the less innocent fanatic, and abused Father with humble dependence for the supplies to the most pernicious purposes. His extrava- of his grace? or have we prayed for these blessgance has furnished to the enemies of internal ings only as a form, and having acquitted ourreligion, arguments or rather invectives, against I selves of the form, do we continue to live as if

we had not so prayed? Having repeatedly implored his direction, do we endeavour to submit ourselves to its guidance? Having prayed that his will may be done, do we never stoutly set up our own will in contradiction to his?

If, then, we receive not the promised support and comfort, the failure must rest somewhere: it lies between him who has promised, and him to whom the promise was made. There is no other alternative; would it not be blasphemy to transfer the failure to God? Let us not, then, rest till we have cleared up the difficulty. The spirits sink and the faith fails, if, after a continued round of reading and prayer: after having for years conformed to the letter of the command; after having scrupulously brought in our tale of outward duties, we find ourselves just where we were at setting out.

We complain justly of our own weakness, and truly plead our inability as a reason why we eannot serve God as we ought. This infirmity, its nature, and its measure, God knows far more exactly than we know it; yet he knows that, with the help which he offers us, we can both love and obey him, or he never would have made it the qualification of our obtaining his favour. He never would have said, 'give me thy heart' | 'seek ye my face'-'add to your faith, virtue' have a right heart and a right spirit,''strengthen the things that remain'-'ye will not come to me that ye might have life'-had not all these precepts a definite meaning, had not all these been practicable duties.

set themselves above it; it is however that powerful agency which sanctifies all means, renders all external revelation effectual. Notwithstanding that all the truths of religion, all the doctrines of salvation are contained in the holy Scriptures, these very scriptures require the influence of that Spirit which dictated them to produce an influential faith. This Spirit, by enlightening the mind, converts the rational persuasion, brings the intellectual conviction of divine truth conveyed in the New Testament, into an operative principle. A man from reading, examining, and inquiring, may attain to such a reasonable assurance of the truth of revelation as will remove all doubts from his own mind, and even enable him to refute the objections of others; but this bare intellectual faith alone will not operate against his corrupt affections, will not cure his besetting sin, will not conquer his rebellious will, and may not therefore be an efficacious principle. A mere historical faith, the mere evidence of facts with the soundest reasonings and deductions from them, may not be that faith which will fill him with all joy and peace in believing.

An habitual reference to that Spirit which animates the real Christian is so far from excluding, that it strengthens the truth of revelation, but never contradicts it. The word of God is always in unison with his Spirit; his Spirit is never in opposition to his word. Indeed that this influence is not an imaginary thing, is confirmed by the whole tenor of Scripture. We are Can we suppose that the omniscient God aware that we are treading on dangerous, bewould have given these unqualified commands cause disputed ground; for among the fashionto powerless, incapable, unimpressible beings? able curtailments of Scripture doctrines, there Can we suppose that he would paralyse his crea- is not one truth which has been lopped from the tures, and then condemn them for not being modern creed with a more unsparing hand; not able to move? He knows, it is true, our natural one, the defence of which excites more suspiimpotence, but he knows, because he confers, cion against its advocates. But if it had been our superinduced strength. There is scarcely a mere phantom, should we with such jealous a command in the whole Scripture which has iteration have been cautioned against neglecting not either immediately, or in some other part a or opposing it? If the Holy Spirit could not be corresponding prayer, and a corresponding pro-grieved,' might it not be 'quenched;' were it mise. If it says in one place 'get thee a new heart,' not likely to be resisted,' that very Spirit which -it says in another a new heart will I give proclaimed the prohibitions would never have thee; and in a third 'make me a clean heart!' said grieve not,' quench not,'' resist not.' The For it is worth observing that a diligent inquirer Bible never warns us against imaginary evil, may trace every where this threefold union. If nor courts us to imaginary good. If then we God commands by Saint Paul, let not sin reign refuse to yield to its guidance, if we reject its in your mortal body,' he promises by the same directions; if we submit not to its gentle perapostle, 'sin shall not have dominion over you;' suasions, for such they are, and not arbitrary -while to complete the tripartate agreement, compulsions, we shall never attain to that peace he makes David pray that his 'sins may not and liberty which are the privilege, the promised have dominion over him.' reward of sincere Christians.

The saints of old, so far from setting up on In speaking of that peace which passeth unthe stock of their own independent virtue, seem derstanding, we allude not to those illuminations to have had no idea of any light but what was and raptures, which, if God has in some inimparted, of any strength but what was commu- stances bestowed them, he has no where pledged nicated to them from above. Hear their impor- himself to bestow; but of that rational yet eletunate petitions!-'O send forth thy light and vated hope which flows from an assured persuathy truth.'-Mark their grateful declarations!sion of the paternal love of our heavenly Father; The Lord is my strength and my salvation!' of that secret of the Lord,' which he himself -Observe their cordial acknowledgments!-assured us 'is with them that fear him ; of that • Bless the Lord, O my soul! and all that is within me bless his holy name!'

Though we must be careful not to mistake for the divine Agency those impulses which pretend to operate independently of external revelation; which have little reference to it; which

life and power of religion which are the privilege of those who abide under the shadow of the Almighty; of those who 'know in whom they have believed;' of those who walk not. after the flesh but after the Spirit;' of those I' who endure as seeing him who is invisible.