Cirers. In these circumstances it is not a little surprising, that

courage and consistency prove sufficient to bear him up er beste oppressive consciousness that he really possesses very =;8/23 any, valid claim to the distinction at which he aims.

Feloctis have no doubt that, by a little practice, the difficulty of nt therag self-possession, and of exhibiting all the ordinary marks early seerity, may be easily surmounted. We are disposed to

at the state of mind produced io such situations, ap

s very near to that most extraordinary of all intellectual Ear si biena, a complete self-imposed, mental fraud, or a state of e space

credence, growing by degrees out of a false conception,

"se falsity the mind must be either fully or in part conFariety when it is first admitted. By familiarity with the illusion, Ons be ce sensations of disgust and disapprobation which accomter lenged in its first reception, are lost ; and when this association beamp, caters the object and its appropriate emotion is dissolved, the of sevent itself will appear to the

apprehension, divested of ihose agrote ties which were the original basis of the association, and the water, C at last to be contemplated in a light the very reverse, and

ssed of qualities the complete opposites, of those with contined, 1, at first, it stood connected. It is obvious that this

ss is greatly facilitated whenever interest, or passion, or Des intratradice, or inveterate habits, incapacitate the judgement for

moral sozial exercise, and invite the heart into the snare. deney dise be case may adinit of many palliations, in reference to he Rér. Tisoces purely human. A man, though he may suspect the

, may not be thoroughly aware how distant he is from any lich, we og bordering on proficiency, in the science be professes to Heteluun

b; the materials of a sounder koowledge may never have of the

en in his way; they may occupy a wide extent, and be at.

ded, in the acquisition, with many difficulties, which he is its bir hia iurally incapacitated to surmount. These things may have

led the imposition wbich he bas practised upon himself, and refore ought at least to soften the censure which judges may

disposed to pass upon him. There are many tendencies and be grande

implations to take up with superficial knowledge in secular

iences. But this is not the case with that science wbicb is Then 13 d.

urely Divine. Similar palliations cannot be found in this case, considerable is in the other, for the man who, with an utter ignorance of the

ery first principles of Divine truth, sets up, either with or gious to vithout the important consideration of being an authorized

eacher, for a proficient, because the great and exclusive derprise liepository of Divine truth, is equally accessible to all : it is the e, acompatirst and the last thing, by way of an authority, which its disof that people ciples have to consult; and it is so constructed, as to be comman of uk pletely within the compass of ordinary powers. These things,

therefore, make ignorance less excusable, and detection more

nay be the r'

et mich e by self-ear

[ocr errors]

bility to inter apunily, as

certain ; while they place all men who consult the original source of information, in an equally advantageous situation for judging, upon the principles of common sense, bow far a teacher's views are, or are' not, regulated by the ultimate standard. We would not be understood to say that no one man possesses greater advantages than another, for acquiring a critical or minute acquaintance with Divine truth; but simply, that the import of the word of God, in general, upon all the fundamental articles, is attainable with the utmost facility by all wbo are in the disposition required by Christ : “ Except “ ye become as little children, ye can in no wise enter into the “ kingdom of heaven.” . That the New Testament is neither an ambiguous nor a subtile book, we must be allowed to maintain, notwithstanding the painful consequence of being obliged to infer froin it the mental guilt of many, who sincerely misinterpret its meaning.

There is an error that may lie deeper in the heart, than in tbe intention. He wbo denies that any man can be culpably erroneous who is sincere, is driven to the necessity of denying, that revelation contains any distinct and definite disclosure of truth, or that it was intended for the common benefit of mankind. It may be to many minds, as it certainly is to our own, a distressing result, to be compelled to infer, in the case of an individual otherwise amiable and trustworthy, that notwithstanding he professes to bave made revelation the subject of his careful and constant study, he is yet in a state of profound misap. prehension of the essential dictates of Divine truth. Yet this has always appeared to us an inevitable consequence of having any definite views of truth; and it is surely an incomparably less evil, tban affirming that revelation is so obscure, and so subtile, as to present insurmountable difficulties to the formation of any definite theory of truth; or that opposite theories may with equal plausibility be grounded upon it; or that no theory at all, or every theory, may be held with equal advantage to the moral and religious character. In some parts of these Dissertations, the Author seems to hold the latter of these principles, that is, when treating of the character of Christ. He thinks it of po importance whether he is believed to be man, or God; a Divine, or a human being : he is still a Saviour, in either case. But wben he speaks of what he is pleased to call the popular and fushionable doctrines of grace, sudden conversion, death-bed repentance, separation from worldly amusements, &c., lie then loses all his indifference, and does not hesitate boldly to declare his persuasion, that both teachers and taught are in an error as palpable as it is pernicious. Their perversity, and prejudice, and-misinterpretation of the language of Scripture, and the guilt of their mental errors, are all charged upon them again and

cereli s

sarith all those aggravations of the immoral tendencies of galatiments, which disturbed the Author's imagination, in a

of sot altogether accordant with the charity he at first Dates, and we think we may say at complete variance with lacerad justice. 29 ten we conceive that the claims of Scripture, as a Divine con, cannot be maintained, without holding that all they of God was designed to be believed ; nor can their utility as a bier al revelation be inferred, but upon the supposition of regio implicity and intelligibility. Tekin these principles we are unavoidably led to infer that these

tations are at utter variance, in many important points,

je dictates of revelation. We have not indeed often been ed 컵

ortunate as to meet with a volume so completely in opn to all our established views of truth, and indeed to any like a rational and philosophical theory of morals and re

It will be expected that we should exhibit some proof

assertions, and we now address ourselves to the task of I beply contrasting some of the Author's views, with the plain de mange

hony of Scripture. urd das W. begins his Dissertations, with a chapter on Religion (29 E-superstition, which, while it assumes to be at once pbilole sue cal and erudite, dwindles into the most jejune and idle in the waon-place. The following specimens may prove satiss, the Pry to those who wish for proof.

True religion discovers itself in rational acts of piety ; in prosa ci Dmy; it keeps the mind

calm, feeling grateful acknowledgements to Tuthor of all good, and in the height of its gratitude keeping clear

"btemperate exultations, deeply impressed with the uncertainty of is sure a Sarthly joys. During sufferings and trials, religion teaches a pais so cart submission to God's will : in our intercourse with the world, it ties of fifests its influence, by honesty, integrity, and charity; and in post vate life by purity in all our thoughts, words, and actions. True fagion produces humility; it claims not exemption from error ; it ual struzzate with candour and toleration, those who differ from us in some

nciples; and shews its superior excellence by a readiness to do

od even to enemies. True religion exemplifies that sublime and Of lek "tensive charity so much celebrated by the Apostle, and acted up christ

. E! by Jesus Christ. e mas, vü o False religion has many branches. Hypocrisy is false religion, iour

, itsuming the name and the cover of religion, with its external to cal services and appearances, to conceal the workings of an evil heart. den current

he hypocrite covers himself with a mask, and acts under disguise. "he hypocrite looks one way and acts another, keeps always in view ome selfish purpose or some gratification, which he wishes to con

eal. The hypocrite is always the foremost and the loudest in his avght of professions. The character given of the Pharisees by our Lord,

presents us with a finished picture of hypocrisy. pp. 1, 2.

table ang


But this is worthy of being delivered from a professor's chair, in comparison with much that follows.

After indulging us with a chapter, in which there is much that is objectionable, on Reason, (he means, the use of reason in religion,) be enters upon Faith. Among other passages of a very similar character, we have the following, which professes to be a solution of the question, Is faith essential to salvation ?

• But faith is particularly insisted upon as essential to salvation ; and if we are to believe the doctrines of several churches, we are not to expect salvation, without we be fully possessed of this lively faith in Jesus Christ. I would not wish to advance any thing to diminishi our opinion of the necessity of this divine virtue; but certainly many things may be offered to moderate this high doctrine, and to make it more consistent with the equity of the divine administration, and the

unavoidable condition of men. In the first place, these churches · who advance these high doctrines, differ widely among themselves, in what they advance as fundamental doctrines, each insisting that their principles, and their's only, lead to salvation. This consideration creates, therefore, some doubts regarding this doctrine. And again, not one of these churches is able to settle what are the articles that are to be regarded as essential, and, without the belief of all and each of which, we cannot attain to eternal happiness. But there is another important point to be settled, before we can establish this doctrine. If no man can be saved without faith in Christ, what must become of all those good men, who lived in the world before the coming of Christ, and who were ignorant of hin, not through any fault of their own, but placed in such situations, by the appoint. ment of God himself? And in like manner, what must become of all those, who have been in the world since the coming of Christ, but who have never had an opportunity of hearing his gospel, or the words of eternal life? And what can be said in behalf of those people adjoining to christian lands, pagans or mahometans, but who are bound down as fast by their prejudices, and prevented from knowing him, as ignorance or darkness can make them? And what is the situation of some upright and honest men, living among christians and professing christianity, and diligent and honest in their enquiries, yet have never been able arrive at that full faith which they eagerly seek after, and to such a degree, as to remove all apprehensions and doubts? It is sufficient to state these cases, and to leave them to the good sense and charitable decision of those, whose minds and understandings are not bound down by the fetters of prejudice. Is it possible to reconcile doctrines of this kind, with the equity of the divine administration? Or with the liberal declaration of our Lord ? In what sense are we to understand, that it will be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah, in the day of judgment, than for those to whom the gospel is preached, but who have not profited by it? These cities were cities of the most abominable wickedness. Their crimes were shocking to human nature; and if allowance shall be made for them, how much more must we expect it, for those good and virtuous men, who have lived in heathen countries, ignorant, unavoidably ignorant of Jesus Christ? Men will be rendered accountable for the talents and privileges they have re. ceived, not for those which they never enjoyed.' pp. 54-57.

• Making faith, this inward principle, the great test, and the sole test of the christian character, opens many doors to impositions ; for it is easy for every profligate to set up pretensions to such attain-, ments. And people of this character, without any serious principles of religion, may be more positive and clamorous than the sincere and upright christian. Another unhappy consequence arises from this being the sole test, it encourages bad people to cherish their evil dispositions and vices, as having faith, they are satisfied that all is well. Further I have to remark, that this doctrine not only leads to impositions on the world, but it causes men themselves to fall into gross mistakes. It is not easy to make plain and simple people com. prehend what is meant by faith; and this class is generally the dupe

f such impositions. The act of believing may appear to them no more than giving their assent to such and such articles, as their spiritual guides may dictate, without making the smallest efforts to understand them, or any attempts to examine or enquire into their truth or falsehood. And they are deterred from examining or doubting, by being assured that their eternal salvation hangs upon the belief of such doctrines. A man may be a deceiver and hypocrite, an impostor, dishonest, fraudulent, an oppressor, and domestic tyrant; yet all these may be overlooked, but to be guilty of this kind of heresy can never be forgiven. We hear much of dangerous doctrines, of damnable doctrines, but not so often of damnable actions.' pp. 57, 58.

Upon this passage, so remarkable above all things for inconclusiveness of reasoning, we have to potice, that the Author has completely overlooked the nature of that faith which is defined to be saving, by the theorists whom he endeavours to controvert. We know of no sober Calvinists who wish to

separate faith from its effects. They consider its validity as. e discoverable only by its effects, and perpetually teach that o " faith without works is dead.” Again, with regard to the

dilemina to which he thinks he has reduced the advocate for the necessity of faith, we must be permitted to say, that all the consequences he enumerates are equally applicable to the unquestionable import of Scripture, and we transfer them to that authority which says, “ The whole world lieth in the wicked one ;'” and “ Without faith it is impossible to please God.”

We are not prepared, nor is it necessary for us, to say, how God will deal with those wbo have had no opportunity of bei lieving the Gospel ; but of all those who have, we know it is bere said, “ He that believeth not shall be damned ;” and, “ If ye

y“ believe not that I am He, ye sball die in your sins." me · At page 77, on the inutility of dark doctrines, Mr. Watson

who fit necessary to please God..cked

He says,

If this then be the case, what are we to say to those in- '

« ElőzőTovább »