formation of any mistakes, I may have Gresham-College. H. PEMBERTON. CONTENTS. The preheminence afcribed by Ariftotle to the fable. SECTION II. Of the ufe and dignity of Boffu's opinion concerning the means, whereby these poems were intended to inftruct. LeClerc's objections to this doctrine approved.p. 16 But the weakness of his inference from thence Epic poetry lefs extenfively useful upon Boffu's When epic poems may be confidered, as having fome SECTION III. Of the fable of epic and UPON what principles the true excellence fable is to be estimated. of the ibid. This illuftrated from the Iliad, the Odyssey, and the Æneid. ibid. ibid. Of the compafs of time to be taken up in a dramatic Why a whole life, or a long war an unfit fubject Thefe obfervations applied to the poem on Leonidas. ibid. Why both in the Iliad and this poem the narration ibid. is not inverted. That the fubject of an epic poem be important. p. 41 When it ought to be taken from the hiftory of the poet's country, and when that is not neceffary. p. 42 Why the poem on Leonidas is not built upon a point ibid. SENTIMENT and character defined, and diftin- Invention defcribed, in order to fhew the eminent de- gree of that faculty, and the real knowledge requi- redinthe poet for jufly exhibiting character. p. 47 ibid. The general nature and defign of poetry inquired into in order to specify more particularly the cha- racteristic of poetic diction. Ariftotle's definition of poetry defective. The nature of poetry according to Fracaftorius.p.73 Wherein the effence of poetry truely confifts. p. 74 to |