Oldalképek
PDF
ePub

DEMURRER.

1. A bill praying discovery, and con-
cluding with the prayer for general
relief, is a bill for relief. [Angell
v. Westcombe]

30

2. Where it appears on the face of the
bill, that the cause of suit accrued
more than six years before the filing
of the bill, a defendent need not
plead the statute of limitations, but
may demur. [Hoare v. Peck] 51
3. A bill of interpleader is not demur-
rable because it does not offer to
bring the money claimed into court.
But the plaintiff must bring it in,
before he takes any step in the
cause. [Meux v. Bell]
4. A bill of discovery is demurrable,
if the words, "stand to and abide
such order and decree thereon" are
inserted in the prayer of process.
[James v. Herriott]·

[ocr errors]

--

175

428

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

DISTRIBUTIVE SHARE.
See WIDOW.

DOUBLE PORTIONS.

See PORTIONS.

DOWER.

See WIDOW.

ECCLESIASTICAL COURT.
This court is not bound by the deci-
sion of the Ecclesiastical Court as
to the effect of a bequest. [Hastings
v. Hane] -

ECCLESIASTICAL BENEFICE.
See COVENANT.

ELECTION.

See CROSS-BILL.

EQUITABLE WASTE.

See WASTE.

67

ESCROW.

A. having received monies belonging to B., privately and without any communication with B., prepared and executed a mortgage to him for the amount. A. retained the deed in his custody for 12 years, and then died insolvent. After his death, the deed was discovered in a chest containing his title deeds. Held that the deed was not an escrow, there being no evidence to show that it was executed conditionally, but that it took effect from its execution, and was good against A.'s creditors. [Exton v. Scott]

ESTATE TAIL. See TENANT IN TAIL.

EVIDENCE.

31

1. An uncle made a provision by his will, for his niece, and, afterwards by a settlement on her marriage.

[ocr errors]

of interrogatories under a decree, and the Court is of opinion that one only of the interrogatories ought not to have been approved of, the exception will be allowed. [Moore v. Langford and Wife] - · 323 3. The Master being about to report the defendant's third answer insufficient, he put in a fourth answer, and then moved to stay the report. Motion refused, the Court having no right to deprive the plaintiff of the benefit of the tenth order. [Russell v. Dight] 4. Where a Master reports as to matter not referred to him, his report ought not be excepted to, but it ought to be referred back to him to be reviewed, and even if that is not done, the unwarranted finding will be disregarded. [Jenkins v. Briant]

EXCHANGE.

430

603

The question being whether the lat- See POWER OF SALE AND EXCHANGE.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

3. If a person interested under a will, files a bill for an account, against the executors, not seeking to charge them for wilful default, and dies pending the suit, his personal representative cannot charge them by bill of revivor and supplement, if the acts complained of were known to the deceased plaintiff. [Ibid.] 4. An executor will be allowed payments made by him to simple contract creditors of his testator, a bond being in existence but not payable, but he will not be allowed payments to legatees, notwithstanding he had no notice of the bond. v. Baldry] See CREDITOR'S SUIT. - PRACTICE, 21.-VENDOR AND PURCHASER, 3.

[ocr errors]

EXONERATION.

621

[blocks in formation]

2. A trust for the separate use of a woman, whether single or married, is valid. [Davis v. Thornycroft] 420 See SEPARATE USE.

FORECLOSURE. See COSTS, 4.

FORFEITURE. See ALIENATION.

FRAUD.

[Norman 1. A deed in the custody of a pur chaser for valuable consideration, which the bill impeached for fraud, ordered, under special circumstances, to be produced. [Kennedy v. Green]

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

6

A wife who had been deserted by her husband, became entitled to a share of an intestate's property, amounting to 3,609 1. The husband, whilst he was ignorant of the amount of the share, assigned it in trust for his wife and children, subject to the payment of 10 s. a week to himself for his life. Although the deed recited that the intestate's estate was very considerable, yet as the administrators, who were the wife's brothers and parties to the transaction,

did not disclose to the husband the amount of the share, the deed was set aside. [Groves v. Perkins] 576 See ACCOUNT, 1.—PUBLIC POLICY.

GUARDIAN.

Guardian appointed to an infant entitled to freehold property worth

IMPEACHMENT OF DECREE. See PLEA AND PLEADING, 5.

IMPERTINENCE.

See NEW ORDERS, 7.

IMPLIED GIFT.

801. a year, without a reference. See CONSTRUCTION, 18.-CROSS RE

[blocks in formation]

Testator bequeathed 7007. to his daughter's husband, his executors, &c. in trust to pay the interest to his daughter, for her separate use for life, and, after her death, to such persons as she should appoint by will, and, in default of appointment, to her personal representatives. The daughter died without having made any appointment. Held that her next of kin, to the exclusion of her husband, were entitled to the 7001. [Robinson v. Smith] - 47 See CONSTRUCTION, 7, 20.-DECREE, 2.- Deed, 4.-FEME COVERT.WIDOW.

MAINDERS.

INADEQUACY OF CONSIDERA

TION. See FRAUD, 2.

INFANT.

1. Guardian appointed to an infant entitled to freehold property worth 80l. a year, without a reference. [Ex parte Jackson]

212 2. Where an infant has an allowance made to him, by his guardians, for his support, a tradesman is not entitled to be paid for articles supplied to the infant, on credit, unless he can make out that, having regard to the infant's circumstances and station (which he is bound to inquire into), the articles were necessaries. [Mortara v. Hall]

3.

[ocr errors]

465

Evidence cannot be read, even on behalf of an infant, as to a fact not stated in the bill unless it is put in issue by his answer. [Powysv. Mansfield] See COSTS, 1.-Demurrer of PaROL.

565

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

2. Injunction granted to restrain the
Lords of the Treasury from paying
the compensation awarded under
11 G. 4 & 1 W. 4, c. 58, for the
office of side clerk in the Exchequer,
which had been abolished. [Ellis
v. Earl Grey] -
214

3. Where a party agrees not to do a
particular act, and there are other
terms in the agreement which are
so vague that the Court cannot en-
force them, it will not grant an
injunction to restrain the breach of
the negative term. The Court will
not give any assistance to a party
seeking to enforce a hard bargain.
[Kimberley v. Jennings]
340
4. Under the 10th order of 1833, the
common injunction cannot be ob-
tained on an amended bill until
five weeks after appearance, and, if
the defendant is then in default, the
application must be made according
to the old practice. [Lee v. Ravens-
croft]

[ocr errors]

474

[blocks in formation]

Testator gave a legacy to his daugh-
ter, and all his real and personal
estate to his wife, and, after her
death, he gave his real estate, sub-
ject to the legacy, to his son in fee.
The wife survived the testator, and
afterwards died. Held that the
legacy, with interest from the end
of a year after the testator's death,
was raiseable out of the real estate,
in case the personal estate was de-
ficient. [Freeman v. Simpson] 75
See ACCOUNTS.-Deed, 3.

INTERPLEADER.
1. Where a principal has created a
lien in favour of another person, on
funds in the hands of his agent, the
agent may file a bill of interpleader
against his principal and the other
claimant. [Smith v. Hammond] 10

See AGREEMENT.-BANKRUPT.-Co-
PYRIGHT. DEBTOR AND CREDI-
TOR, 1-3.-MULTIFARIOUSNESS.-
PLEA AND PLEADING, 6.—WASTE 2. A bill of interpleader is not de-

« ElőzőTovább »