Passingham v. Pitty (a), 17 C. B. 299, 314, 315. Decision (in favour of the vote) affirmed, with costs. De Boinville v. Arnold, 1 C. B., N. S. 3, 22. Decision (in favour of the vote) affirmed, with costs. Clarke v. Bury St. Edmunds, 1 C. B., N. S. 23, 33. Decision (against the vote) affirmed, without costs. Hannaford v. Whiteway (a), 1 C. B., N. S. 53, 62. Decision (against the vote) affirmed, with costs. Sherlock v. Steward, 7 C. B., N. S. 21, 28. Decision (against the vote) affirmed, without costs (the case being a reasonably fit one for argument). Collier v. King, 11 C. B., N. S. 14, 478. Decision (against the vote) affirmed, without costs (the case being a reasonably fit one for argument). Powell v. Bradley, 18 C. B., N. S. 65, 71. Decision (in favour of the vote) affirmed, with costs. Tepper v. Nicholls, 18 C. B., N. S. 121, 141. Decision (against the vote) affirmed, without costs. Flatcher v. Boodle, 18 C. B., N. S. 152, 168. Decision (in favour of the vote) affirmed, with out costs. Ford v. Boon (a), L. R. 7 C. P. 150, 158. Decision (in favour of the vote) affirmed, without costs. Pickard v. Baylis, L. R. 5 C. P. D. 235. Decision (against the vote) affirmed, without costs (b). (a) In this case the appellant's counsel only was heard. (b) Per Lord COLERIDGE, C. J., "As counsel for the respondent has been instructed at the request of the court, we do not consider it a case in which the appellant should pay costs." It was the rule that when the revising barrister's decision was reversed, no costs were given: Burton v. Aston, 2 Lutw. 143, 158. But the Legislature may have intended to modify the above-mentioned rule by the enactment of sect. 38 of the Parliamentary and Municipal Registration Act, 1878, quoted ante, on p. 497. In an appeal from a revising barrister, the point which was raised by the case depended on a question of fact which the barrister did not decide. The court refused to decide the question, and remitted the case, to be re-stated. The appellant then abandoned the appeal. The court held that the respondent was not entitled to costs: Lawe v. Maillard, L. R. 4 C. P. 547. Where the respondent to an appeal intends to take a preliminary objection he should give notice to the appellant of his intention to do so. If no such notice is given, and the objection prevails, the appeal will be dismissed without costs: In re Speight, Ex parte Brooks, L. R. 13 Q. B. D. 42. INDEX. ABODE, objector's place of, must be sufficiently stated in ACTUAL POSSESSION, of rent-charge for six months necessary ADDRESS OF LANDLORD omitted from new lodger claim, AFFIDAVITS. See Revising Barrister. AFTER GRASS (rights of). See Chipping Sodbury. AGENT, declarations in a consolidated appeal signed by, 157, ALLOWANCE OR DEDUCTION from poor rate, 407. ALMS, what not a receipt of, 424; what a receipt of, 430, 438, ALMSMEN. See Hospital. AMENDMENT. See Abode, Claim, Description, Declaration, No power to alter in third column freehold to leasehold, AMENDMENT-continued. 66 s. 24, to strike out words from third and fourth columns, ANNUITY charged on lands in different occupations, appor- APPEAL. See Practice. Declarations in a consolidated, signed by agent, see APPORTIONMENT. See Rent-charge. Of interest on mortgage upon several freeholds, 23; ARTICLED CLERK. See Exeter, Residence (break of). ASSESSED TAXES, 409. ASSIGNEE has no vote in respect of equitable life interest in ASSISTANT OVERSEER, 304, 325, 388. |