Oldalképek
PDF
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

sur ces monticules, c'était en qualité de théore et pour présenter au dieu son religieux hommage." Itaque p. 568. b. verba lin. 7- 15. omittenda, scribendumque: „sed ut simpliciter veneraretur deum tanquam theorus", et lin. 17. ,,audiendi" pro venerandi, denique lin. 19. scribe 1 22 pro 1 24. Novum tituli apographum edidit Bailius l. c. III. p. 229. qui habet vs. 5. extr. K(OMIT(l)N, vs. 4. extr. ΠPOCKYNH C(,)N^IAN haud dubie de coniectura, cui fidem non habeo. Nam quod in apographis ^l est, ligandum in N; vs. 5. extr. €z€φθ€NzATO, quod videri potest esse in lapide; vs. 6. extr. nAPHN dilucide; vs. g. init. LZ AAPIAN cet. in fine €ni φZωPACB, quod si ita est, scribendum ά«s 3. Totum titulum in metra redactum exempli causa proposuit Bailius; qualem lusum si quis instituit, certe versus iustos facere debebit, non vitiis contaminatos.

[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

N. 4727. p. 37o. repetiit Letronnius l. c. p. 364 sq. n. cccxLvi. (cf. tab. xxxvi. 46.) qui schedis Nestoris L'Höte usus repraesentat vss. 1-6. uu pro ω. Novum apographum edidit Bailius 1. c. p. 242. qui vs. 1. AY^ACANTOC, vs. 2. init. ΦωNACTAC, vs. 3. init. HN0ON, ibid. extr. CABINNA I, vs. 4. init. (1) PAC, vs. 5. extr. ΠEMITTUJI AEKOT(*) 14\E, vs. 6. NIAYT(JIAAEXECKENA€YPEIKOCI, vs. 7. KAITiE LYPA EI KOLT(,) I T EM TÌT(u) I. Nec Letronnius nec Bailius acceutus peculiaris rationem habuit. In contextu litteris minusculis expresso scribe vs. 1. aùêázavros, quod etiam in annotatione desideravimus; vs. 5. init. %vSov.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

N. 474. p. 377. repetiit Letronnius 1. c. p. 588

sq. n. ccclxvii. (cf. tab. xxxvi. 55.). Novum apograpbum edidit Bailius l. c. p. 266. omissis verbis prioribus (vss. 1. 2. et parte vs. 5.) quae singularem titulum constituunt et a nobis n. 4742. tractantur. Vs. 5. (qui est vs. 1. tituli Trebullae) Bail. KAIKI^IA -Tp€BOY^^A sine C, de quo quae dixi in var. lect. confirmari videntur apographo a Letronnio expresso in quo est Tp€BOY^^A- HC (vide ad n. 4742.), iisque suffragatur etiam Bailius; vs. 3. extr. ^IGON omittit apogr. Letr.; vs. 6. Bail. BACI^etoce(JOY cet.; vs. 7. Bail. ^O^YPMOC; vs. 8. Bail. TO(JCA AHN, Letr. TOO CAHN; vs. 9. Bail. ANAPePA ΔHNYN cet., Letr. ANc, POPAANYN; vs. 1 o. Bail. O^Oqpyp OMAITHCTI POC€)€^€I PANONTYXHC. Protulit igitur vs. 7. lectionem O^YPMOC quam editores certatim reposuerunt de coniectura; quae si revera in lapide est, certe non honori est ductori epigrammatis, qui paulo post addit τὰ τάS^ yoûza, in quo praedicatum alterum est ad vocem φωνλ relatum. Letronnii coniecturas satis tetigimus in an

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]
« ElőzőTovább »