The Principles of Judicial Proof: Or, The Process of Proof as Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial TrialsLittle, Brown, 1931 - 1056 oldal |
Részletek a könyvből
1 - 3 találat összesen 79 találatból.
23. oldal
... possible , the theory as stated is impeachable . . . . By the ' best ' explanation is meant ... that solitary one out of all possible hypotheses which , while explaining all the facts already in view , is narrowed , limited , hedged ...
... possible , the theory as stated is impeachable . . . . By the ' best ' explanation is meant ... that solitary one out of all possible hypotheses which , while explaining all the facts already in view , is narrowed , limited , hedged ...
44. oldal
... possible exits for non - belief , and makes it more unavoidable to accept his own proposed infer- And this process of stopping up exits is Corroboration . It may form a new stage in presenting evidence , but it is not an additional ...
... possible exits for non - belief , and makes it more unavoidable to accept his own proposed infer- And this process of stopping up exits is Corroboration . It may form a new stage in presenting evidence , but it is not an additional ...
633. oldal
... possible criteria , therefore appearing to be guilty ; " Subject II— 4 , of 18 possible criteria , therefore innocent but possessing knowledge ; ― " Subject III 5 , of 18 possible criteria , therefore innocent but possessing knowledge ...
... possible criteria , therefore appearing to be guilty ; " Subject II— 4 , of 18 possible criteria , therefore innocent but possessing knowledge ; ― " Subject III 5 , of 18 possible criteria , therefore innocent but possessing knowledge ...
Tartalomjegyzék
DEFINITIONS | 3 |
Autoptic Proference | 10 |
THE PROBATIVE PROCESSES APPLICABLE TO JUDICIAL | 17 |
Copyright | |
130 további fejezet nem látható
Más kiadások - Összes megtekintése
Gyakori szavak és kifejezések
accused accused's alleged American State Trials ante assertion believe British Trials Series Castle Bromwich cause character circumstances circumstantial evidence conduct consciousness court crime criminal Criminal Psychology cross-examination dactyloscopy deceased defendant dence desire effect emotion Erdington error evidenced evidentiary fact examination example existence experience explained false Form of Inference guilty habit HANS GROSS Hence Howell's State Trials human identity instances intention judicial jury kinds of evidence knowledge lord Macclesfield major premise Marcellus Hall marks memory ment mental method Method of Agreement mind motive murder narration nature ness Notable British Trials object observed occurred offered opponent perception perjury person possession possible present principle prisoner probably probandum probative value proof proponent's proved Psychology question recollection seen step of inference strychnine supposed tell tendency testified testimonial evidence thing tion traits Trial American truth usually witness woman