Oldalképek
PDF
ePub

CHAMBERS'S

POCKET MISCELLANY.

THE GREAT STIRLING CASE.

ABOUT the year 1825, a respectable-looking elderly gentleman made his appearance in Edinburgh, where his habits and pretensions created some degree of curiosity. He lived generally in lodgings, genteel, but not aristocratic. He seemed to be a man of very moderate income, and did not mix in high society, yet he called himself Earl of Stirling. This title was an old and respected one in Scotland, and its assumption did not create much surprise; for poor gentlemen with contested claims to ancient titles of nobility, are not very uncommon in the Scottish metropolis. With regard to the person describing himself as Earl of Stirling, some spoke doubtingly of his pretensions, others treated him as an impostor. What he really was, will appear, after giving certain preliminary explanations.

Sir William Alexander of Menstrie, a poet and statesman of the reign of King James I. of England, had entered into that sovereign's project for colonising the borders of the Gulf of St Lawrence. He was gifted by charter with a large territory, nearly identical with the

[blocks in formation]

same which is still called Nova Scotia, but containing a considerable portion of Canada; and he and his heirs were appointed hereditary lords-lieutenant of the district, with something very like sovereign powers. A territory without people on it is, however, of little value either to sovereign or proprietor. To induce British subjects, especially Scotsmen of rank, to take land in the district, the new dignity of Baronets of Nova Scotia was created. It was to be conferred on acceptable persons, who paid for and received a grant of 16,000 acres of land in the colony.

The Earl of Stirling's son becoming involved in difficulties, sold his American privilege to a French colonist; and by the treaty of St Germain in 1632, these North American British colonies were all ceded to France. At the treaty of Utrecht in 1713, they became again a British possession, but on a new foundation, as if they had never belonged to Britain before. Perhaps the government might have restored any family claims of a reasonable kind that could have been shewn to be lost by the French conquest, but the Alexanders, as we have seen, had disposed of their right. Though some persons were from time to time spoken of as representatives of the distinguished family, no one made a serious attempt to resume the title and its privileges, until the present century, when the individual above mentioned, laid his plans in the remarkable manner which we are now going to describe.

The name of the gentleman in question was Alexander Humphrys or Humphreys. His first step was, in 1824, to obtain a royal licence to assume the name of Alexander. He stated in his application, that he had a maternal grandfather of that name, and he wished to assume it, 'as well out of grateful respect to his memory, as out of respect for the wishes oftentimes expressed by his deceased mother.' It is believed that any person may obtain a licence of this sort who states any such plausible reason, and pays the necessary fees. It could have no effect in a legal point of view. But the expression 'royal licence' has a great influence on common minds-a secret known very well to second-rate inventors, who always announce their

[ocr errors]

wares as authorised by Her Majesty's Royal LettersPatent.'

His next step was to shew his descent from the old Stirling family, and get it in some way judicially certified. The connection he tried to establish was this: his father, William Humphreys of Birmingham, had married Hannah Alexander, granddaughter of the Rev. John Alexander. This reverend John was the son of another John Alexander, of Donaghadee, in Ireland; and he was said to be a son of the Honourable John Alexander, fourth son of the Earl of Stirling. There had long existed in Scotland certain formalities, by which a person could obtain a public and judicial certificate of his pedigree, or his connection with the succession to certain property. Without entering into any technical particulars, it may be sufficient to say, that until certain improved practices were established, these 'services,' as they are called, used to be carried through as mere matters of routine. A narrative was made out, and some documents read; and then the persons assembled, taking for granted that everything was regular, certified their belief in it. If the whole be a tissue of lies and forgeries, which is sometimes possible, it has generally to be examined afterwards, as in the present case, when there is an attempt made to obtain any property or other advantage, and the attempt is resisted. The reader will perhaps remember that in the novel of Guy Mannering, when young Bertram is discovered, a process of this kind is adopted by Pleydell, as the first step for asserting the young heir's right. Colonel Mannering says: "Well, have you carried through your law-business?'

'With a wet finger,' answered the lawyer; 'got our youngster's special service returned into Chancery. We had him served heir before the macers.'

'Macers! who are they?'

"Why, it is a kind of judicial saturnalia. You must know, that one of the requisites to be a macer, or officer in attendance upon our supreme court, is, that they shall be men of no knowledge.'

'Very well?

« ElőzőTovább »