« ElőzőTovább »
of the Places mentioned in the first Book of Samuel, and
not spoken of before. That the reader may the more easily apprehend, how The introthe series of this geographical treatise answers to the series of the sacred history, I judge it best to comprehend all the places, mentioned in the first book of Samuel, under one chapter, dividing the same into two several sections, as follows.
SECT. I. of the Places mentioned from the Birth of Samuel, to his
anointing Saul to be King over Israel. In the first chapter of the book commonly called by us, the first book of Samuel, we are informed ver. 19, 20. that of Ramah, Samuel was born at Ramah, otherwise called (as appears thaim-Zofrom ver. 1.) Ramathaim-Zophim, probably to distinguish birth-place it from other places in the Holy Land, which were also of the pro
phet Sacalled by the name of Ramah. One place of this name muel.
state of Rama.
PART III. was spoken of in the last section but one of the last chap
ter of Vol. I. viz. chap. vi. §. 25. And chap. v. §. 36. of Vol. I. Part. II. we have taken notice of another place of the like name, lying in the land of Gilead, or Mizpeh, and thence called Ramoth-Gilead, and Ramath-Mizpeh. The Ramah we are here speaking of seems to be called Ramathaim-Zophim on a like occasion, namely, from its being situated in a tract called Zuph, or Zophim, and (as the text, ver. 1. tells us) in mount Ephraim; and, according to Eusebius and Jerom, in the (then) district of Timnath near Diospolis or Lydda, being the very same that is called Arimathea in the history of the Gospel.
From this account of its situation, it is not to be The present doubted, but that this is the place which to this day goes
under the name of Rama, and lies in the usual road taken by pilgrims from Jaffa, or Joppe, to Jerusalem, and is accordingly taken notice of by Thevenot a and Le Bruyn. From these we learn, that whereas this Rama was anciently a city, it is now no more than an open town, under the government of the Bassa of Gaza. It is still pretty large, and looks well enough on the outside, as may be seen by the draught which Le Bruyn has given of it. Hard by the place where stood part of the ancient city, is still to be seen a large square tower, much like to a steeple. They say, that formerly it was as high again as it is at present, and was erected in honour of the forty martyrs that suffered death in Armenia. It joins on to a church, and is by Thevenot represented as the steeple to that church, built in honour of the forementioned martyrs. At this tower are likewise to be seen some ruins, which seem to be the remains of a monastery. Thevenot expressly says, that heretofore there was a stately large convent here, of which the cloister seems to be still very entire, by what could be observed in passing by the gate, for he was told, that Christians were not permitted to enter into it. The Latin monks have a convent or monastery at
* Thevenot, Part I. chap. xxxvi. Le Bruyn, chap. xlvi. ,
present in Rama, where there commonly resides a father CHAP. I. superior with two monks. The pilgrims usually lodge SECT. I. there till they go to Jerusalem. This convent, which hath a very neat church, was built, as they say, in the very place where the house of Nicodemus anciently stood. The inhabitants, as far as Le Bruyn could guess, amounted to about three thousand souls, as well Christians as Turks. All the carávans, which go from Cairo in Egypt to Damascus, Aleppo, and Constantinople, pass by this Rama. All the doors in this town are very low, not three feet high, says Thevenot, to hinder the Arabs from riding into their houses. There is in Rama another church, besides that above mentioned, dedicated to the honour of St. George.
All rơund about Rama one meets with a great many wells, which served, as they say, to keep wheat and oats. We threw, says Le Bruyn, into one of them, which was very deep, a great many stones, which, in falling to the bottom, made a very extraordinary and hollow noise at top.
Hard by Rama is also a very fine cistern, made with a great deal of art upon two rows of piazzas. It certainly served, says Le Bruyn, to supply the town with water, as several for the same use are to be seen in Italy.
Le Bruyó adds, that, whilst he stayed at Rama, he walked as far as Lydda, which lies on one side of Rama, about three miles from it: which confirms the opinion, that this Rama is the same called Arimathea in the New Testament, and so the same with Ramah, the birth-place of the prophet Samuel; forasmuch as Eusebius and Jerom expressly tell us, that this lay near to Lydda.
I shall conclude what relates to Ramah with a particular taken notice of by Le Bruyn. It is, says he, no extraordinary matter for men to take a journey to Jerusalem; but that women should have such wandering heads, may seem somewhat strange. However, there are instances of it. A little before I arrived at Rama, an English middle-aged gentlewoman was come thither, at
PART III. tended only with one footman. After she had completed
her journey to Jerusalem, and there paid her devotions, she went into France, where she settled, because of some
affronts she had met with in England. 3. In chap. iv. of this first Book of Samuel we have an of Aphek. account of a fight between the Israelites and the Phi
listines; the former encamping beside Eben-ezer, the latter in Aphek, ver. 1. Eben-ezer is here mentioned proleptically, this name being not given to the place till some time after, as we read, chap. vii. ver. 12. Of which therefore more, when we come to that chapter. I have in chap. iv. §. 40. of Vol. I. Part II. observed, that there were apparently two Apheks, one lying in the tribe of Asher, the other in the tribe of Judah; and this last must be understood here, as lying in all probability not far from Eben-ezer, which lay in the tribe of Judah, as will
appear bereafter, viz. $. 14. 4. The Israelites in their first engagement with the PhiOf the
listines were worsted by them, losing about four thousand country of the Philis. men. Whereupon they fetched the ark from Shiloh
into their camp, thinking that the presence of that would certainly save them from their enemies; inasmuch as God would not permit the ark to fall into the hands of the Heathens. But they found their confidence ill-grounded. For upon joining battle a second time, they were quite routed, and the ark taken by the Philistines, and carried into their country. Which it will be here requisite to speak more distinctly of, for the better understanding the several particulars related concerning the ark, during its stay in this country.
We learn then, that the Philistines were descendants It was di- .of Mizraim, the father of the Egyptians, and the second five lord son of Ham, and so brother to Canaan, the father of the ships. Canaanites, Gen. x. 6-14. We learn also from Gen. x.
19. that the coast lying along the eastern end of the Mediterranean Sea, from Şidon unto Gaza, did originally belong to the Canaanites. Whence it follows, that whereas we find by the Scripture-history, that the Phi