« ElőzőTovább »
1772. that he was married } else we should have shown
his lady more civilities. She is a very fine woman. Ætar. 63.
But how can you show civilities to a non-entity?
He then spoke of St. Kilda, the most remote of
My best wishes ever attend you and your family. Believe me
I have, from my respect for my friend Dr. Beattie, and regard to his extreme sensibility, inserted the foregoing letter, though I cannot but wonder at his considering as any imputation a phrase commonly used among the best friends.
I gave him an account of the two parties in the 1772. church of Scotland, those for supporting the rights of patrons, independent of the people, and those against it. JOHNSON. “ It should be settled one way or other. I cannot wish well to a popular election of the clergy, when I consider that it occasions such animosities, such unworthy courting of the people, such slanders between the contending parties, and other disadvantages. It is enough to allow the people to remonstrate against the nomination of a minister for solid reasons.” (I suppose he meant heresy or immorality.)
He was engaged to dine abroad, and asked me to return to him in the evening, at nine, which I ac, cordingly did.
We drank tea with Mrs. Williams, who told us a story of second sight, which happened in Wales where she was born. He listened to it very attentively, and said he should be glad to have some instances of that faculty well authenticated. His ele. vated wish for more and more evidence for spirit, in opposition to the groveling belief of materialism, led him to a love of such mysterious disquisitions. He again justly observed, that we could have no cer. tainty of the truth of supernatural appearances, unless something was told us which we could not know by ordinary means, or something done which could not be done but by supernatural power; that Pharaoh in reason and justice required such evidence from Moses ; nay, that our Saviour said, “ If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin.” He had said in the morning, that “ Macaulay's History of St. Kilda” was very well written, except some foppery about liberty
1772. and slavery. I mentioned to him that Macaulay or told me, he was advised to leave out of his book the
wonderful story that upon the approach of a stranger all the inhabitants catch cold;' but that it had been so well authenticated, he determined to retain it. JOHNSON. " Sir, to leave things out of a book, merely because people tell you they will not be believed, is meanness. Macaulay acted with more magnanimity."
We talked of the Roman Catholick religion, and how little difference there was in essential matters between ours and it. Johnson. " True, Sir; all denominations of Christians have really little difference in point of doctrine, though they may differ widely in external forms. There is a prodigious difference between the external form of one of your Presbyterian churches in Scotland, and a church in Italy; yet the doctrine taught is essentially the same."
I mentioned the petition to Parliament for removing the subscription to the Thirty-nine Articles. JOHNSON. “ It was soon thrown out. Sir, they talk of not making boys at the University subscribe to what they do not understand; but they ought to consider, that our Universities were founded to bring up members for the church of England, and we must not supply our enemies with arms from our arsenal. No, Sir, the meaning of subscribing is, not that they fully understand all the articles, but that they will adhere to the Church of England. Now take it in this way, and suppose that they should only subscribe their adherence to the Church of England, there
7 See ante p. 52 of this volume.
would be still the same difficulty; for still the young 1772. men would be subscribing to what they do not un.
Ætat. 63. derstand. For if you should ask them, what do you mean by the Church of England? Do you know in what it differs from the Presbyterian Church ? from the Roinish Church? from the Greek Church from the Coptick Church? they could not tell
So, Sir, it comes to the same thing.” Boswell. “ But, , would it not be sufficient to subscribe the Bible?” JOHNSON. Why no, Sir; for all sects will suba scribe the Bible; nay, the Mahometans will subscribe the Bible ; for the Mahometans acknowledge Jesus Christ, as well as Moses, but maintain that God sent Mahomet as a still greater prophet than either.
I mentioned the motion which had been made in the House of Commons, to abolish the fast of the 30th of January. JOHNSON. “Why, Sir, I could haye wished that it had been a temporary act, perhaps, to have expired with the century. I am against abolishing it; because that would be declaring it wrong to establish it; but I should have no objection to rnake an act, continuing it for another century, and then letting it expire.”
He disapproved of the Royal Marriage Bill; “Because (said he) I would not have the people think that the validity of marriage depends on the will of man, or that the right of a King depends on the will of man. I should not have been against making the marriage of any of the royal family without the appro. bation of King and Parliament, highly criminal.”
In the morning we had talked of old families, and the respect due to them. Johnson. “Sir, you have a right to that kind of respect, and are arguing for
1772. yourself. I am for supporting the principle, and am
disinterested in doing it, as I have no such right."