Oldalképek
PDF
ePub

tion, admit the existence within you of anything but a power unknown to you of feeling and thinking.

Now tell me honestly, is this power of feeling and thinking the same as that which causes you to digest and to walk? You own that it is not; for in vain might your understanding say to your stomach,Digest: it will not, if it bé sick. In vain might your immaterial being order your feet to walk: they will not stir, if they have the gout.

The Greeks clearly perceived that thought has frequently nothing to do with the play of our organs; they admitted the existence of an animal soul for these organs, and for the thoughts a soul finer, more subtle— a nous.

But we find that this soul of thought has, on a thousand occasions, the ascendancy over the animal soul. The thinking soul commands the hands to take, and they obey. It does not tell the heart to beat, the blood to flow, the chyle to form; all this is done without it. Here then are two souls much involved, and neither of them having the mastery.

Thou

Now, this first animal soul certainly does not exist; it is nothing more than the movement of our organs. Take heed, oh! man, lest thou have no more proofs but thy weak reason that the other soul exists. canst not know it but by faith: thou art born, thou eatest, thou thinkest, thou wakest, thou sleepest, without knowing how. God has given thee the faculty of thinking, as he has given thee all the rest; and if he had not come, at the time appointed by his providence, to teach thee that thou hast an immaterial and an immortal soul, thou wouldst have no proof whatever of it.

Let us examine the fine systems on the soul, which 'thy philosophy has fabricated.

One says, that the soul of man is part of the substance of God himself; another, that it is part of the great whole; a third, that it is created from all eternity; a fourth, that it is made, and not created. Others assure us, that God makes souls according as they are wanted, and that they arrive at the moment of copula

[merged small][ocr errors]

tion. They are lodged in the seminal animalcules, cries one. No, says another, they take up their abode in the fallopian tubes. A third comes, and says-You are all wrong: the soul waits for six weeks, until the fœtus is formed, and then it takes possession of the pineal gland: but if it finds a false conception, it returns, and waits for a better opportunity. The last opinion is, that its dwelling is in the callous body: this is the post assigned to it by La Pieronie. A man should be first surgeon to the king of France, to dispose in this way of the lodging of the soul. Yet the callous body was not so successful in the world as the surgeon was.

St. Thomas, in his question 75 and following, says, that the soul is a form subsisting per se, that it is all in all, that its essence differs from its power; that there are three vegetative souls, viz. the nutritive, the argumentative, and the generative; that the memory of spiritual things is spiritual, and the memory of corporeal things is corporeal; that the rational soul is a form "immaterial as to its operations, and material as to its being." St. Thomas wrote two thousand pages, of like force and clearness; and he is the angel of the schools.

Nor have there been fewer systems contrived on the way in which this soul will feel, when it shall have laid aside the body with which it felt; how it will hear without ears, smell without a nose, and touch without hands; what body it will afterwards resume, whether that which it had at two years old, or at eighty; how the I-the identity of the same person-will subsist; how the soul of a man become imbecile at the age of fifteen, and dying imbecile at the age of seventy, will resume the thread of the ideas which he had at the age of puberty; by what contrivance a soul, the leg of whose body shall be cut off in Europe, and one of its arms lost in America, will recover this leg and arm, which, having been transformed into vegetables, will have passed into the blood of some other animal. We should never finish, if we were to seek to give an account of all the extravagances which this poor human soul has imagined about itself.

It is very singular, that in the laws of God's people not a word is said of the spirituality and immortality of the soul; nothing in the Decalogue, nothing in Leviticus, or in Deuteronomy.

It is quite certain, it is indubitable, that Moses no where proposes to the Jews pains and rewards in another life; that he never mentions to them the immortality of their souls; that he neither gives them hopes of heaven, nor threatens them with hell; all is temporal.

Many illustrious commentators have thought, that Moses was perfectly acquainted with these two great dogmas; and they prove it by the words of Jacob, who, believing that his son had been devoured by wild beasts, said in his grief,-" I will go down into the grave (in infernum) unto my son;" that is, I will die, since my son is dead.

They further prove it by the passages in Isaiah and Ezekiel; but the Hebrews, to whom Moses spoke, could not have read either Ezekiel or Isaiah, who did not come until several centuries after.

It is quite useless to dispute about the private opinions of Moses. The fact is, that in his public laws he never spoke of a life to come; that he limited all rewards and punishments to the time present. If he knew of a future life, why did he not expressly set forth that dogma? And if he did not know of it, what were the object and extent of his mission? This question is asked by many great persons. The answer is, that the Master of Moses, and of all men, reserved to himself the right of expounding to the Jews, at his own time, a doctrine which they were not in a condition to understand when they were in the desart.

If Moses had announced the immortality of the soul, a great school among the Jews would not have constantly combatted it. This great retreat of the Sadducees would not have been authorised in the state; the Sadducees would not have filled the highest offices, nor would pontiffs have been chosen from their body.

It appears that it was not until after the founding

of Alexandria that the Jews were divided into three sects—the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Essenes. The historian Josephus, who was a Pharisee, informs us, in the thirteenth book of his Antiquities, that the Pharisees believed in the metempsychosis; the Sadducees believed that the soul perished with the body: the Essenes (says Josephus) held, that souls were immortal; according to them souls descended in an aërial form into the body, from the highest region of the air, whither they were carried back again by a violent attraction; and after death, those which had belonged to the good dwelt beyond the ocean in a country where there was neither heat nor cold, nor wind, nor rain. The souls of the wicked went into a climate of an opposite description. Such was the theology of the Jews.

He who alone was to instruct all men, came and condemned these three sects; but without him we could never have known anything of our soul; for the philosophers never had any determinate idea of it; and Moses-the only true lawgiver in the world before our own-Moses, who talked with God face to face, left men in the most profound ignorance on this great point. It is then only for seventeen hundred years that there has been any certainty of the soul's existence and its immortality.

Cicero had only doubts; his grandson and granddaughter might learn the truth from the first Galileans who came to Rome.

But before that time, and since then, in all the rest of the earth where the apostles did not penetrate, each one must have said to his soul,-What art thou? Whence comest thou? What dost thou? Whither goest thou? Thou art I know not what, thinking and feeling; and wert thou to feel and think for a hundred thousand millions of years, thou wouldst never know any more by thine own light without the assistance of God.

O man! God has given thee understanding for thy own good conduct, and not to penetrate into the essence of the things which he has created.

So thought Locke; and before Locke, Gassendi; and before Gassendi, a multitude of sages; but we

have bachelors who know all of which those great men were ignorant.

Some cruel enemies of reason have dared to rise up against these truths, acknowledged by all the wise. They have carried their dishonesty and impudence so far as to charge the authors of this work with having affirmed, that the soul is matter. You well know, ye persecutors of innocence, that we have said quite the contrary. You must have read these very words against Epicurus, Democritus, and Lucretius:-" My friend, how does an atom think? Acknowledge that thou knowest nothing of the matter." It is then evident, ye are calumniators.

[ocr errors]

No one knows what that material being is, which is called spirit,' to which-be it observed-you give this material name, signifying 'wind.' All the first fathers of the church believed the soul to be corporeal. It is impossible for us limited beings to know whether our intelligence is substance or faculty: we cannot thoroughly know either the extended being, or the thinking being, or the mechanism of thought.

We exclaim to you, with the ever-to-be-revered Gassendi, and Locke, that we know nothing by ourselves of the secrets of the Creator. And are you Gods, who know everything? We repeat to you, that you cannot know the nature and distinction of the soul but by revelation. And is not this revelation sufficient for you? You must surely be enemies of this revelation which we claim, since you persecute those who expect everything from it, and believe only in it.

Yes, we tell you, we defer wholly to the word of God; and you, enemies of reason and of God, treat the humble doubt and humble submission of the philosopher as the wolf in the fable treated the lamb; you say to him,-Thou saidst ill of me last year; I must suck thy blood. Philosophy takes no revenge; she smiles in peace at your vain endeavours; she mildly enlightens mankind, whom you would brutalize, to make them like yourselves.

« ElőzőTovább »