Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew
The essays in this volume arose out of the Society of Biblical Literature section on linguistics and Biblical Hebrew and have been selected to provide a summary and statement of the state of the question with regard to a number of areas of investigation. The sixteen articles are organized into sections on phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, discourse analysis, historical/comparative linguistics, and graphemics.
1 - 3 találat összesen 23 találatból.
Which contains the more original stem form, and second, What brought about the
change that produced the other, newer base? Perhaps the more obvious choice
is to posit qittal- as the original base. After all, as we have already noted, there ...
147-51), the origin of these forms remains obscure, so that it is difficult to use
them as evidence for earlier vocalization with any confidence. Blau maintains (§
2.3) that attested qittal forms reflect original qittala rather than innovations due to
If they are original in proto-Hebrew, they constitute a precedent for positing D *
qattila - *y\qattil- with the same base; if they result from analogy, they must be
analogous to D *qattila - *y\qattil-. in which case again we must take the latter as
Mit mondanak mások - Írjon ismertetőt
E J Revell The Development of Segol in an Open
Gregory Enos Phonological Considerations in the Study
14 további fejezet nem látható