Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew
The essays in this volume arose out of the Society of Biblical Literature section on linguistics and Biblical Hebrew and have been selected to provide a summary and statement of the state of the question with regard to a number of areas of investigation. The sixteen articles are organized into sections on phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, discourse analysis, historical/comparative linguistics, and graphemics.
1 - 3 találat összesen 19 találatból.
As Zevit, ibid., 109, noted, the situation in Phoenician is similar to that in Ugaritic.
The Ugaritic poetic texts, presumably composed in a more archaic idiom, use
only b and /. The prose texts, where innovative usages are likely to appear first, ...
This article has utilized Aramaic and Phoenician parallels to a great extent. Does
this mean that Israelian Hebrew more closely resembled these two varieties of
Northwest Semitic speech than it did Judahite Hebrew? To answer this question,
For the Phoenician D suffix-conjugation qittil note Greek silllch and Latin sillec = /
Sillik/ as the second element of personal names, and late Punic writings like
hydS for /hiddisV 'he renewed'; see S. Segert, A Grammar of Phoenician and
Mit mondanak mások - Írjon ismertetőt
E J Revell The Development of Segol in an Open
Gregory Enos Phonological Considerations in the Study
14 további fejezet nem látható