Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew
The essays in this volume arose out of the Society of Biblical Literature section on linguistics and Biblical Hebrew and have been selected to provide a summary and statement of the state of the question with regard to a number of areas of investigation. The sixteen articles are organized into sections on phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, discourse analysis, historical/comparative linguistics, and graphemics.
1 - 3 találat összesen 29 találatból.
changes *qattila > *qittila and *haqtila > *hiqtila as we move down toward proto-
Hebrew; we need only move, in fact, into proto-Canaanite, the immediately
preceding phase, since evidence for one or both of the forms *qittila, *hiqtila is
These are said to reflect the actual form of the Canaanite D suffix-conjugation in
this period. But despite the fact that the D infinitive in Ugaritic had a u-vowel,
quttalu (probably semantically equivalent to Akkadian pa/urrus, and the Hebrew
It was noted earlier that the Hebrew noun pattern qittol in some instances derives
from early Hebrew *qittul, which in tum derives from proto-Canaanite *quttul. It
may further be suggested that some (though certainly not all) examples of the ...
Mit mondanak mások - Írjon ismertetőt
E J Revell The Development of Segol in an Open
Gregory Enos Phonological Considerations in the Study
14 további fejezet nem látható