Oldalképek
PDF
ePub

opinion became prevalent that he was a rude and wild genius, who poured forth at random, and without aim or object, his unconnected compositions. The difficulty of understanding him rendered it impossible to perform his works with fidelity. His fame did not break forth into full glory till after his death. Since then it has but increased in lustre with the course of time. Even the rivalrous efforts of both opera houses, last season, did not yield a true representation of the Fidelio. Some time must yet elapse ere "a consummation so devoutly to be wished for," can be accomplished in this vast and wealthy metropolis. Nor has the Philharmonic Society attained the glory of rendering a perfect performance of the "Choral Symphony," the last and the greatest of these works by the greatest man of this century. To the minds of some of the members of the Philharmonic Society, the "Choral Symphony presents nothing more than a chaotic confusion of sounds, rudis indigestaque moles.*

"

These observations have grown to such a length, that we must defer our analysis of Mr. Silas's work for a future number. In the meanwhile, without exposing ourselves to the lues Boswelliana, a disease said by Macaulay to infect those who, in admiration of some idol, proffer their praise in such indiscriminate abundance, as Boswell rendered to Johnson, we may consistently aver, that no sonata possessing the same high promise, and deserving the same claim upon the attention of connoisseurs and artistes, has issued from the press since the publication of the sonatas of Beethoven. We sincerely hope that a composer so young, enriched with such large acquirements, and gifted with such rare powers and surpassing abilities, will neither seek nor shun distinction, and that his genius may find fame only as he can meet it in his progress to the highest attainment of his art, for a few such works as this sonata, must bear the name of the composer to a bright immortality.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

players we have in Manchester; then the strings comprised such men as C. A. Seymour (leader), Conran, R. Andrews, the brothers Mollenhauer, Baetens, Lidel, Thorley, Waud, Gledhill, &c, &c. We never heard theinstrumental accompaniments better given-the chorus was numerous and effective--the principal singers were Miss Shaw and Mrs. Thomas, Messrs. Perring and Delavanti (the regularly engaged principals at the "People's Concerts "), to which were added, on this occasion, that popular favourite, Miss Rebecca Isaacs, and Mlle. Carolina Beer. When we add that Mr. William Barlow presided at the organ, and that Mr. D. W. Banks conducted in his usual energetic style; it may be readily believed that the performance was very good-and the crowded attendance will not be wondered at. We were most provokingly late (thanks to the ladies and Christmas parties!), by which we lost the beautiful introduction: that delicious chorus, "The harvest now is over, the for aid." We were still more disappointed at missing Mr. Perring's summer days are gone," and the duet, "Zion spreadeth her hands recitative and air, as "Obadiah," Ye People," and "If with all your hearts," which, we believe, he sang very nicely, and with true devotional feeling. The double quartett, "For he shall give his angels," was just concluded as we entered the hall; and the first thing we heard was the episode or scene with the Widow and Elijah, by Miss Isaacs and Delavanti; it was the first time we had heard Miss Isaacs in sacred music, and she succeeds in that, as in everything else she attempts. There was the same careful attention to dress and appearance, comely and appropriate to the sacred Oratorio, as we have seen her display in the widely different style suited to such characters on the stage as the Wili bride or the Bohemian girl. Her singing too was marked by the same care and fitnessand she did all she had to do admirably; and, in the difficult air, Hear ye, Israel," she fairly astonished us. The last singer we had heard in this" aria d'abilita," was Jenny Lind; and we were afraid it was beyond Miss Isaacs's powers, as it is too high for her register. Where there is a will, a pains-taking, and a steadiness of purpose, much may be accomplished that, to ordinary perceptions, appears impossible. Miss Isaacs's triumphed over all the difficulties, and gave such a spirited delivery to the fourth passage, commencing, "I am He that comforteth," that she electrified the whole audience, and received a most unanimous encore. Mr. Delavanti was evidently rendering the part of Elijah under difficulties; he does not possess the power or depth of voice, the elevation or commanding dignity of style, to give force to this arduous and trying part. We were pleased, however, with the sensible delivery he gave to the numerous recitatives; the immensely difficult air, "Is not his word like a fire?" he very judiciously omitted. Still FREE TRADE HALL-Mendelssohn's Elijah-Christmas day. the part was too much for him, as he showed symptoms of hoarseWe were induced by the kind invitation of H. B. Peacock, Esq., ness in the latter part of the oratorio. Mdlle. Carolina Beer has the spirited projector and chief proprietor of the "Concerts for a rich and powerful contralto voice. She sang for the first time in the People," to depart from our usual practice of spending the English on this evening. She had but two songs, "Woe unto evening of Christmas day at home, and to go and hear the Elijah them who forsake Him!" and the beautiful and ever popular, "O, instead. To say we were never more gratified in our lives would Rest in the Lord." She was encored in both; and richly did she be untrue-we have heard a greater performance even of Mendels- deserve the compliment, for we never heard from any one more sohn's great work--but that we were more highly gratified than we true or fervent expression in the exquisite morceaux of Mendels expected, is true enough; we were delighted to see so many thou-sohn. The like favour was accorded as usual to that tit bit-the sands, as were assembled in that vast hall, listening to such elevat- unaccompanied trio-"Lift thine eyes;" although we have heard ing music as the oratorio of Elijah. There were evidently many it go better; Miss Isaacs was rather too powerful for Miss Shaw and parties from the neighbouring towns and villages, who had taken Mr. Thomas. Mr. Perring wanted power to make the fiue tenor advantage of its being a general holiday to come and hear it. The song, "Then shall the Righteous Shine," effective in the hall, reserved seats were all occupied, and the galleries and body of the above the full orchestra. Miss Shaw was not quite equal to lead hall quite crammed full. Mr. Peacock certainly deserves great the quartett, "Holy, holy is God the Lord!" The chorusses that praise for the care and pains he must have taken to produce the we heard went very well, especially "Blessed are the Men,' ," "Baal, we Oratorio in so complete a manner; and, at the same time, at so cry to thee," with the subsequent responses of the Baalites and moderate a charge for admission (the prices being 2s. 6d,, 1s. 6d., the Prophet Elijah, "Be not Afraid," and all the chorusses, and 18., only). The band took us by surprise-we did not expect except a slight hitch in the beginning part of "Thanks be to God," to see so full a complement, or to see so much talent amongst it— and the very difficult passage in "Behold! the Lord God passed there were the usual wind instruments, all taken by the best by! Mr. Seymour, by the way, deserves especial praise for the beautifully delicate manner of his giving the obligato bit for the first violin, at the words, "And after the fire there came a still small voice." Lidel, too, was first rate in the violoncello obligato to the air, "It is enough, O Lord."

MUSIC AT MANCHESTER.

(From our own Correspondent.)

S. K. E.

As it may not be generally known, it is but an act of justice to state that this symphony was composed at the request of the Philharmonic Society, and the commission was endorsed by a munificent sum. For this and other occasional acts equally laudable and tending to the protection and advancement of music, we know we owe a deep debt of gratitude to the Philharmonic Society; and, therefore, we shall ever feel an interest in its welfare.

Altogether, the oratorio was a very great treat on the evening of Christmas day, for the holiday folk, and must have sent hundreds delighted to their homes.

The new pantomine, The Babes in the Wood, is having a successful run at the Theatre Royal. We "assisted "at its representation on Monday last, when there was a bumper house.

We are sorry to find Mr. C. A. Seymour has left the post of leader of the orchestra of the Theatre Royal. The Guardian says, in a paragraph on the subject, that he has been "unworthily supplanted." Whom by? Mr. Loder or Mr. Strickle, the ripieno to Mr. Seymour? as the first now conducts, the latter leads. Formerly, Mr. Seymour did both. We understand the manager says, that Mr. Seymour had not time to attend to his own teaching engagements and his duties at the Theatre Royal as well. The Guardian says, "not the slightest blame attaches to Mr. Sey; We can well believe it, and are very sorry that he should

99

mour." have left the Theatre.

Original Correspondence.

NEWSPAPER MUSICAL CRITICISMS.

(To the Editor of the Musical World.)

SIR, I think it cannot be denied, that numerous as are the Professors of Music spread over this country in all our large and small towns, that a great appreciation of music and musicians is sadly deficient, and I think this is chiefly to be set down to the fact, that the newspaper press, the great organ of public instruction and information in the provinces, never employs musicians to write their musical critiques. Yet editors laugh at musicians becoming politicians, they ridicule artists pretending to understand political economy, while they themselves, without knowing a crochet from a bull's foot, take upon their own shoulders the responsibility of judging upon all musical matters-forgetting that to properly understand the science of music a life must be spent. There is but one cure for this, and that is, the spreading abroad over the face of the country really good musical papers, so that the public may be enlightened with respect to this important art. Your paper, Sir, I have endeavoured to push in this town, and I hope that some good has been done by the various clever articles it contains. Still we are not quite as bright in musical affairs as we ought to be. A short time back one paper stated "they had viewed the instrument (a piano), and that one of its great peculiarities was, that, while the treble had eight notes higher than most other pianos, the bass only ascended to its usual height." Another paper declared the singers were all at sixes and sevens, entirely out, and seemed to be running after each other-(they were singing a fugue of Mozart's.)

A third paper, in speaking of Signor Mario and Lablache, said, "Signor Lablache has a most magnificent organ, but we think his register is neither as sweet or high as Signor Mario's."

Again, in speaking of Madlle. Angri, a paper said, "She has a most magnificent bass voice."

One Editor, after hearing Grisi, declares her tones are not as full as the great Pisaroni's (a contralto).

And a very sapient editor asserts M. Jullien never writes his

own music.

GREGORIAN CHANTS.

(To the Editor of the Musical World.)

the observations of "One of the Clergy" on my two former letters DEAR SIR,-Last week I was obliged to discontinue my reply to rather abruptly. Do me the kindness to find room, if you can, for the remainder of it in your next number.

But

mitted fact "that uncultivated voices and ears exist to a greater In my second letter expression was given to the generally adthis opinion" One of the Clergy" declares to be preposterous and extent among the clergy than among any other class of men.' absurd, and yet advances no proof in support of his denial. The statistics on which the prevailing opinion is founded are before the public, who can judge for themselves. In the first place there are in the amateur choral societies alone, at Exeter Hall, St. Martin's Hall, and in various parts of London, some thousands of voices constantly engaged on the most elaborate musical compositions. These are exclusive of the immense mass of amateurs who enjoy the exercise of their musical talents in private, and also of the members of the musical profession; who, altogether, would make up a number amounting to something tremendous. Now against this how few are there in London which can be cited as places where can be heard the service intoned even on one note by a clergyman in a clear voice, and with a distinct utterance? Many might be named where they are said so confusedly that the language would pass as easily for Latin as English. There are many circumstances which will account for this unsatisfactory state of things. For instance, in many of the densely populated parishes and districts, the over-worked (and often under-paid) clergy can scarcely secure time to obtain the rest which nature requires, much less the leisure to cultivate their voices; while in other cases the clergy do not approve of musical services, and candidly confess they never studied a note of music in their lives. These causes contribute materially to bring about the actual state of things referred to. But I was not dealing with causes, but with a fact, and why "One of the Clergy" should deny that fact so positively, I am at a loss to imagine.

Next, "One of the Clergy" says, "the Clergy of the Church of England, with few, very few exceptions, are not advocates of Pope Gregory's music; and that where they are, that music is conduced by the Organist.' Now the fact is, the revival of the Gregorian Chants and the suppression of the Anglicans, was first advocated, and for a long time urged solely by the magazines in the interest of the Ultra High Church Clergy. "The Organists" had nothing whatever to do with the movement. On the contrary, at those churches where the use of those chants was and is most strongly advocated and persevered in, their original introduction was entirely owing to the influence of the Clergy, and their perpetuation is secured by the same power in direct opposition to the feeling and conscientious opinion of the organists, who moreover in most cases have good reason to know that any attempt at resistance on their part would be as much as their "places" are worth,-which is not much, by the way. So much for Organists being the "conducers" of the movement. I am quite ready to admit, bowever, that as a follower, "an unwary Organist" has, as I before said in a former letter, here and there been "caught." And nicely they are rewarded for their pains. The onus of the whole movement is now being tried to be laid on their shoulders. It has long been foreseen this would be the case, and within a fortnight of that being stated upon paper, it was verified by the letter of

But to cover all this, a notice has just appeared in a paper here, lauding a Mr. Yates (I believe a clever singer). It states that most of our counter tenor singers, even those of highest reputation, sing chiefly in falsetto, that Mr. Yates not only reaches the high" One of the Clergy." notes without piping off into a falsetto, but produces a fine, pure, and equable tone. Did not this editor know that a counter tenor voice is a fulsetto, and not a distinct voice? it is the voice of youth | retained in manhood. The falsetto possessed by tenors and basses is the boy's voice retained with the man's, but the counter tenor has only the boy's voice, a counter tenor is all falsetto.

Do, Mr. Editor, push your paper about as a warner against the musical ignorance now so rampant in our large and small towns. Believe me, yours truly,

ALFRED SEMI-BREVE.

"One of the Clergy" next puts the question, " are the laity to be first in objecting to what is contrary to their taste, as your correspondent does?" ~ In reply I beg to say I have made no objection on any such grounds. He must have read my letter very carelessly. I viewed the question solely as one of fact, historical truth, and chronological fidelity;—very different grounds. He further inquires, "are the Clergy to have the last or no voice at all" in the direction of the music? I three times referred to the subject in my two letters; and had "One of the Clergy" perused my letters with proper attention, he would have known that I expressly mentioned that arrangement as a most judicious one, provided the clergy possess the necessary knowledge of the subject.

To this simple and most fair condition "One of the Clergy" | feels dissatisfied; though a more appropriate must have been a would seem to object.

"One of the Clergy" then strongly recommends me to read a pamphlet by Mr. Spark. I have followed his suggestion, obtained the pamphlet, and perused it. He particularly draws my attention to that part where Mr Spark, "with the spirit of knowledge and of charity (!) speaks of church music, such as can be participated in by both priest and congregation, and complains of the florid character of much of the present day." "One of the Clergy" must know perfectly well, that I have never advocated the use of any other kind of chant-music in the church than the most "simple and pure;" that I have not suggested the use of such as the priest could not sing, or that is of a florid character. What I did object to was the attempt to degrade church music to medieval rudeness by a few of the clergy, and that under false pretences. The difference, although so great, "One of the Clergy" affects not to see. Let me therefore remind him that a return to "plain simplicity" in chant-music has nothing whatever to do with a return to Gregorian chants; neither does the defence of the Anglican chants imply a desire to perpetuate the use of florid or trifling music in the church. Such inferences are "preposterous and absurd."

This brings me to the most important part of the letter of " One of the Clergy;" in fact, to the point on which the weight of the whole question rests. I will therefore offer no apology for entering into it somewhat fully. "One of the Clergy" complains of the removal of the plain song from the tenor to the treble part, and "thus depriving the people of their birthright and portion in the sacred song." Now let us see whether this is the fact.

In times long since past, the Gregorian chants were, as is well known, transposed into the tenor part of the gamut, to suit priests' voices. When harmony came to be added, the chants were still retained in the same place, and the harmony constructed above and below them. When at length, however, the influence which had kept them there came to be curtailed, reason and common sense were allowed to have some voice in church musical matters. First, it must have been cbserved then, as now, that when a piece of four part harmony was sung with an equal number of voices to each part, the ear invariably seized upon the most acute part. An equal number only of trebles to tenors was sufficient to render the treble part predominant; such predominance arising from the simple circumstance of its superior acuteness. Next, as of the human race at least one-half were females, it followed that the voices of half the adults in an ordinary congregation would be trebles. And the two or three hundred school children, answering to the charity children of modern times, would likewise be trebles. Then, of the remaining voices, those of the adult male,- -some only would be tenors; at least half being basses. In a word, there would be in a promiscuous congregation, in round figures, about five times as many trebles as tenors. It therefore followed that if the people" were really to take part in the chanting, the melody ought to be pitched where it would be in unison with the great bulk of the "people's" voice; where it would, from a natural phenomenon, stand out most prominently; and where it could the most easily be heard, recognised, and followed by the remainder of "the people." Both reason and common sense pointed to the treble as the only part where it could be placed consistently with the attainment of these ends. Now, as the Gregorian chants, even in their harmonized form, did not present this arrangement, new chauts were composed, which not only supplied all existing deficiencies, but were at the same time so simple that all could sing them, and besides this were pure, perfect, historically correct, and strictly devotional in style. The older chants, having performed long and honourable service in the church, were now allowed to take their place in history, where they would ever have remained precious from their antiquity and associations.

66

But what are we now told and expected to believe? That in placing the melody where it best suited the great majority of voices, and could be the most easily followed by the remainder, it had been taken away from "the people;" and that by carrying it back to where it would be both obscured and overpowered, (and where it would suit no better voices than the priests,), it would be giving it back again to "the people." On hinting at this palpable and disreputable hoax, I made use of the mildest term I could think of,-a ruse,-but with even this "One of the Clergy"

stronger one.

In insinuating that the early church composers of the English school deprived the people of the opportunity of taking part in the chanting, "One of the Clergy" has not only underrated their musical knowledge, and perhaps overestimated his own, but has committed himself to an opinion against which even his knowledge of the numeration table ought to have secured him. Five to one is not a minority.

On referring to Mr. Spark's pamphlet, I found as I had anticipated, that the singular opinion concerning "the people's deprivation," quoted by "One of the Clergy" as positively emanating from Mr. Spark, is attributed to that gentleman unfairly, who himself only gives it as a quotation. It has long been a favourite fallacy with the party. This again is another instance of the manner in which unwary Organists are saddled with the responsibilities attendant on the errors of others. I must again hurriedly conclude, and remain, Yours obediently,

[blocks in formation]

BRINLEY RICHArds, and the RECOLLECTIONS of Wales. (To the Editor of the Musical World.)

SIR,-Since your position obliges you to the responsible task of holding an even balance between conflicting opinions, you will no doubt allow me space for a few words more à propos of this vexed question.

"A Lover of Fair Play" is, doubtless, quite aware that neither by the Musical World, nor by any other respectable paper, is any communication considered admissible unless authenticated by the writer's name and address. The remarks of your correspondent, then, on " Anonymous Communications and Literary Thuggism," (had he understood things he would have written Thuggee, not Thuggism), are to be taken merely as an argumentum ad ignorantiam-that is, a device to entrap the uninformed.

And by the way, Mr. Editor, it might have been as well to have informed your readers to this extent, last week, lest they should for a moment have imagined that your valuable paper could be made a vehicle for private slander.

But in truth, Sir, there is no meddling with private character at all in this controversy. We are dealing only with facts patent to all men, and which Mr. Leoni Lee himself has placed before the tribunal of criticism, declaring that he and "his firm are upon their trial" before a discerning public. Now, Sir, I believe Mr. Leoni Lee's cause to be a bad one, but honestly, I do not think it so bad as to stand in need of the line of defence resorted to by a "Lover of Fair Play."

I am obliged to pass over the greater part of your correspondent's letter, because, among other "morbid" affections, I have a positive antipathy to personalities and calling names. Being, as I said, but a "plain thinker," I see in such practices, nothing but the resort of a vulgar mind baffled in argument.

The "Lover of Fair Play" evidently gives up the argument as a bad job, and contents himself with joking about Welch rabbits, and vouching for the honesty with which Messrs. Lee and Coxhead earn their bread and cheese. He is no doubt sensible that reasoning is not in his line. It is a cut above him.

The only part of his letter which claims attention is that which refers to Mr. Brinley Richards's offer to re-arrange the melodies for Messrs. Lee and Coxhead. Your correspondent, Sir, emphatically denies that the former gentleman could have met with insult from the latter firm. Why does not that firm authorise their advocate to state exactly what took place on the occasion of Mr. Brinley Richards's application? The public might then judge for themselves. The offer is not denied. Indeed, Mr. Editor, may not the remarks about treating the public continuously to hashed Welsh airs, ("I thank thee, Jew, for teaching me that word,") be taken as a full admission that Mr. B. R. had offered the "airs" to Messrs. L. and C., and that that firm had declined to “dish" them up again.

I do take it is as an admitted point, Mr. Editor, that the offer to re-arrange the melodies was made to Messrs. Lee and Coxhead. It is also unmistakeably conceded that Mr. Brinley Richards has not invaded Messrs. Lee and Coxhead's copyright. Thus is conceded to us, Mr. Editor, the whole point at issue, and the controversy, so far as its subject matter is concerned, terminates. I will not pause to ask whether, under the circumstances thus in evidence, Messrs. Lee and Coxhead were justified in advertising the old work as "new music." I pass on, because I have a graver question to ask, viz.: Can Mr. Leoni, with his hand upon his heart, and as in the pre-honour to announce that it is my intention to give you every desence of that public upon whose judgement he has cast himself, declare that, under the circumstances now proved, he holds himself justified in having circulated that printed letter which gave occasion to the controversy ?-a letter tending to injure a house against which it is now manifest he had no just cause of complaint -a letter which, I am instructed, would sustain an action at law, and which seems to have been put forward on the craven presumption that it would be allowed to pass without answer.

No, no, sir; there is but one way left open to Mr Leoni Lee, by which he can extricate himself from the false position in which he finds himself, and set himself right with the public; and that is by a frank and manly avowal that the issuing of that circular was the effect of proper information and due reflection: in a word, that it was an indiscretion, that, as I asserted in my former letter, "he was not well advised by those who advised him" to put that circular forward. There can no longer be any pretext for denying, Mr. Editor, that a wrong has been done. Public morality is not to be blinked by letters in the "virtuous indignation" vein; still less is it to be frittered away, and the eyes of the public blinded, by miserable platitudes, not even rising to the dignity of fifth-rate jokes. This is exactly what is not fair play.

You already have my name and address, Mr. Editor, and therefore I am no further anonymous than is also your correspondent, the self-styled champion of plain dealing.

I have the honour to be, sir,
Your obedient servant, as before,
A SUBSCRIBEr.

P.S.-You will perhaps allow me to append the correction of two or three oversights in the setting up of my former letter. In the third paragraph, "the whole quotation "should read "the hole question." In the fourth paragraph, for "the assurance that," read "to assume that." And in the sixth paragraph, instead of "for truth," the copy had "in truth."

Dramatic.

Drury Lane.-A very numerous and a very quiet audience assembled here yesterday se'nnight to greet Mr. Bunn on the commencement of his new undertaking. The theatre has been entirely re-decorated, and has a very light, elegant, and tasteful appearance. The ground colour is white, on which is wrought a profusion of gold ornaments, intermingled with a bright blue, sufficient to give relief and warmth to the general effect. The audience was at once numerous and joyful. The pit was crowded, the boxes were brilliant, and the galleries were packed with people. At seven o'clock the green curtain rose, and the National Anthem having been sung by the whole corps dramatique, Mr. Bunn presented himself at the foot-lights, and was received with cordial demonstrations of applause. He said

“LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: To use the language of one of your greatest favourites, Grimaldi, on this very spot, and on this very anniversary,Here we are again!' and if you could but be aware of the obstacles which have been thrown in our way, you would very much wonder how we got here (laughter). But ten days have passed since the parish in which this theatre stands did not contain

another such filthy dust-hole as this house in which we are assembled. I trust to your courtesy to say what it looks like now (loud cheers). The pleasing change which you contemplate has been effected by hands, but I am sure you will concur with me in thinking that hands could not have done it had there not been hearts in them. Some years ago I had the honour in this theatre of explaining the reason why I restricted the performances to ballet and opera. It arose from this, that those who wanted such entertainments were sure of procuring them at another theatre over the way. This argument no longer exists, and I therefore have the scription of entertainment that research and industry can devise (cheers). So many misrepresentations have been circulated as to my original, actual, and future intentions, that I have felt it to be due to the public and myself to state what my intentions really are. I cannot better illustrate the condition upon which my success depends, than by an anecdote which I have related on a former occasion, and in presence of another audience. Formerly there used to sit in the orchestra of this theatre a foreigner, who played the bassoon. In his youth he was an admirable performer, his notes being exceedingly mellifluous, yet audible through the whole house; but when time took those liberties with him which he takes with all, his notes could with difficulty be heard beyond the first row in the pit. The gruff old gentlemen, who for years were accustomed to take up their position in that part of the house, at last grew impatient, and roared blow louder;' the little boys in the more remote regions, took up the cry, and shouted blow louder,' till at last the poor musician turned round in anger, and, facing his audience, exclaimed, Ladies and gentlemen, it is all very well for these prople to shout blow louder,' but vere is the vind to come from (laughter)? And now, ladies and gentlemen, to point the moral and apply it to myself, I say, do me the honour to find the wind, and I will do the rest (loud cheers). I will do what I can to deserve your patronage, and, should it be granted to me, there is not a heart amongst you that will be more sincerely grateful than

mine."

[ocr errors]

Mr. Bunn has therefore, in the present state of popular feeling, prudently declined hazarding a large outlay on the "legitimate" part of his undertaking. Of the operatic and ballet department, where the hazards of the game will warrant a larger stake, we shall have enough to say by and bye. Meanwhile, we pass over the tragedy of Fazio, which opened the performances, and come at once to the festival novelty of the evening-the pantomime.

The author, for once abandoning supernatural agency in the conduct of his story, has gone to the series of prints, entitled "Industry and Idleness," from the pencil of the inimitable Hogarth. The preliminary scene alone is allegoricalthis is the abode of Idleness and Ignorance, a couple of antiquated beldames, who are discovered rejoicing at the extent of their dominion in the world, when they are interrupted by Industry and Knowledge (the Misses Coveney), who dispute their right to the government of the rising generation; but their own more enlightened policy, the story begins, and we after a change, in which they exhibit the beneficial effects of Drone (Mr. H. Payne), the two apprentices, plodding through are introduced to Toby Cricket (Mr. H. W. Payne), and David the city to the house of their employer. This scene, which is "the city side of Blackfriars Bridge, in 1751," is one of the most interesting in the pantomime. It shifts, by a dioramic movement, to the sign of "The Golden Tea Kettle," where the two 'prentices meet their future master. In the scene of " the double-bedded room "Mr. Payne excites the risible muscles of the audience by the process of making his " Night Gear," and getting into bed, where he and his companion are visited in a dream by "Visions of the future," depicted in transparencies of some of Hogarth's prints. The scene of "The Shop," which follows, has been constructed to display the singular powers of pantomimic humour

possessed by Mr. Payne, who goes through the whole begin at a slapping pace, and, as we observed to a friend seated process of opening and sweeping the shop, serving numerous near us, must be gifted with no uncommon talent to keep their customers, and finally, dancing a Pas de deux with the wind for the finish. Our previsions were realized; they flagged fair Jemima, his master's daughter, all which the unrivalled not unfrequently, and were only saved by an excellent scene pantomimist executes with the vivacity and humour peculiar towards the end of the pantomime, of which we shall speak to him. The scene, however, is too long. Meantime, the hereafter. As we were saying, the scene opens with the idle 'prentice, having joined a gang of thieves, returns to caverns of the Nereids, where the fairy Nautila (Miss Desplunder his master's shop, and carrying off Jemima, deposits borough), is planning the marriage of Billy Taylor. Britannia her in the cellarage, where, his old companion following him, is indignant at not being consulted, and decrees that he shall Britannia was impersoa combat de deur takes place, each champion being armed with be impressed and carried off to sea. a bladder suspended by a string from a stick. Having, with nated by Miss Kate Terry, who delivered her speech with these warlike weapons, whacked each other to a stand-still, the much archness and decision; this scene was also cleverly supernatural agencies interpose, and the transformations take managed; we see a miniature of Britannia, enthroned on her place in the " Fairy Beehive." Of the jokes and hits that fol- wooden walls and attended by her trusty guard of miniature lowed some told excellently and some failed. The despatch from blue jackets, who made the air ring with their tiny voices. We Paris, where there were "plenty of balls" on the 2nd of are next introduced to Billy Taylor's emporium, in Tooley December, and "plenty of bullets" on the 3rd, was relished street, where we find him preparing for his marriage with so well that the subject might have been handled again very | Paulina (Mr. Wynne), a Bloomer, of Portsmouth. Here the safely. The best and most original hit, however, was the impressment takes place, and the scene changes to the quarter burlesque violin solo, by the Clown, which created prodigious deck of the gallant Thunderbomb, where numerous jollificamerriment, and obtained a well deserved encore. The Bloomer tions are being carried on until interrupted by the Phantom joke failed by missing a fair opportunity for some juvenile Crew of the Flying Dutchman. Billy Taylor jumps overboard, dancing, a sure card in a pantomime. Among the best of and as he can swim, lands in King Callimaco's island, where the scenery is "The Street at the West End, by Moonlight," he is about to marry the black daughter of His Majesty, but -"The great Fiz-Whistle Railway," and lastly,-"The is interrupted by the arrival of Paulina, who forbids the banns Triumph of Industry," which is the most beautiful and and shoots her faithless lover. Things are however soon correct representation of the opening of the Exhibition made square by the usual transformations into Columbine, that we have yet seen. The pantomime would be much Harlequin, Clown, Pantaloon, and Sprite; represented by improved by curtailment. The introduction, which is the Miss Leclerq, Messrs. Cormack, Flexmore, Paulo and Lebarr; best part, is too long, and the Harlequinade contains some the latter, however, having sprained his knee, an apology was dead weight which should be carefully expunged. With made for his non-appearance. On the whole, the scenery these provisos the pantomime will doubtless have a run. The of the introduction was cleverly managed, but one great performers were excellent, especially Mr. H. Marshall (e mistake was, that the first was the best; it consisted of an immense grotto, containing a vast variety of shells of all

Clown), and Miss Palser (the Columbine), who is very pretty,

and dances with sylph-like grace and vivacity.

PRINCESS'S THEATRE.-On Boxing night, the evening's entertainments commenced with the Merchant of Venice, which, to the credit of the gods be it said, was listened to most religiously from beginning to end. There was a slight attempt at uproar at the rising of the curtain, owing to the salutations exchanged between the pit and gallery, but this was soon quieted; and, barring a few oranges aimed at the gentleman in red plush, who philosophically disregarded these infringements of good taste, and went through his work of cleansing and watering the stage with the most stoical indifference, we may safely affirm that we never saw such an orderly assemblage of Boxers. It is no compliment to Mr. Charles Kean to say that he played the part of the Jew with his wonted tact and perfection. The other parts were well cast, and Miss Frankland, as Portia, was loudly applauded, as was Miss Mary Keeley, who looked most charmingly the little renegade Jessica, and sang her song so well to the taste of the audience as to elicit a universal call for repetition. The vagaries of Launcelot Gobbo found a worthy representative in our old friend Harley, and as we said before, the curtain went down on an audience in every way well disposed to be pleased with the forthcoming pantomime of Billy Taylor, or The Fling Dutchman and the King of Raritongo. The first scene represents the submarine caverns of the Nereids, considerably below" Nathaniel," as the programme has it. We have tried to guess the joke here suggested, but give it up in despair, and recommend it to the serious consideration of the author of "The Overland Route." The brothers Sala and Mr. George Ellis are too 'cute for us. The scene is cleverly painted, and the dialogue is uncommonly racy; the authors

sizes, which, by a judicious employment of reflecting the light,

presented a very beautiful picture, and gave a charming assem blage of chaste colours.

The harlequinade embraced a variety of scenes in which the prevalent topics of the day were in many instances happily introduced. We had Bramah's lock manufactory and Mr. Hobbs, the Model Farm, the Eternal Lodging-house, and the attendant Policeman paying his court to the Cook down the Area. Cheapside in a Fog was a capital piece of painting, and does the artist much credit. The grand scene of the evening was, however, "London by Moonlight." We are here introduced to the housetops, where a variety of amusing tricks are performed by the clown and pantaloon; and amongst others, a serenade accompanied by an immense caterwauling, proceeding from myriads of tabbies perched on the surrounding chimney-pots. Exasperated at last by these incessant interruptions, the clown and pantaloon seize a revolver, and climbing on the top of a sort of swivel chimney-pots, they take a circular shot at the chorus, who come tumbling down by hundreds. This scene was quite new, and was welcomed with shouts of laughter and applause; it was unanimously pronounced to be excellent, and is of itself sufficient to ensure the success of the pantomime, which was soon brought to a close by the usual display of red and blue lights which illuminate the Home of Britannia, in the floral realms of light. If we are somewhat dubious about the meaning of the last phrase, we are willing to own that the words are pretty, and like everybody else we are satisfied with the meaning of the authors, which was no doubt to please. In this they have succeeded; on the whole the pantomine was excellent, and will no doubt be largely patronised by our young friends now home for the holidays. The scenery was painted under the direction of Mr.

« ElőzőTovább »