COPIED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE SHORT-HAND WRITER'S NOTES.

LONDON:

PRINTED BY RICHARD CLAY,

BREAD-STREET-HILL.

[In the High Court of Chancery.

PROCEEDINGS

ON THE MOTION FOR A RECEIVER,

BEFORE THE

RIGHT HON. LORD COMMISSIONER PEPYS,

AND THE

RIGHT HON. LORD COMMISSIONER BOSANQUET,

In the Court of Chancery;

Copied from the Transcript of the Short-hand Writer's Notes.

Monday. 23d November 1835.

SIR WILLIAM FOLLETT.-My Lords

Before my learned friend

Sir CHARLES WETHERELL. goes on, I think it necessary to state to your lordships that I appear in this case for the City of London-for what purposes I know not; they have not thought fit to serve the City of London with the motion, although, when it comes to be fully discussed and opened, you will perceive that the City of London are one of the most essential parties in this measure. Your lordships are perfectly well aware, that although it may serve the purposes of persons on one side of the question not to give a notice of motion to another party, it is the right of that party hereafter to appeal against any order which is made ex parte, and in the absence of a person who ought to be served with notice.

Sir W. FOLLETT.-We have no objection to the City of London appearing now.