« ElőzőTovább »
1784. myself of that part of my biographical undertaking, Ætat.75. "Ower
however difficult it may be to do that which many of my readers will do better for themselves.
His figure was large and well formed, and his countenance of the cast of an ancient statue ; yet his appearance was rendered strange and somewhat uncouth, by convulsive cramps, by the scars of that distemper which it was once imagined the royal touch could cure, and by a slovenly mode of dress. He had the use only of one eye; yet so much does mind govern and even supply the deficiency of organs, that his visual preceptions, as far as they extended, were uncommonly quick and accurate. So morbid was his temperament, that he never knew the natural joy of a free and vigorous use of his limbs: when he walked, it was like the struggling gait of one in fetters; when he rode, he had no command or direction of his horse, but was carried as if in a balloon. That with his constitution and habits of life he should have lived seventy-five years, is a proof that an inherent vivida vis is a powerful preservative of the human frame.
Man is, in general, made up of contradictory qualities; and these will ever shew themselves in strange succession, wherc a consistency in appearance at least, if not reality, has not been attained by long habits of philosophical discipline. In proportion to the native vigour of the mind, the contradictory qualities will be the more prominent, and more difficult to be adjusted ; and, therefore, we are
* As I do not see any reason to give a different character of my illustrious friend now, from what I formerly gave, the greatest part of the sketch of him in my “ Journal of a Tour to the Hebrides," is here adopted
not to wonder, that Johnson exhibited an eminent 1784. example of this remark which I have made upon
Ætat. 75. human nature. At different times, he seemed a different man, in some respects ; not, however, in any great or essential article, upon which he had fully employed his mind, and settled certain princi. ples of duty, but only in his manners, and in the display of argument and fancy in his talk. He was prone to superstition, but not to credulity. Though his imagination might incline him to a belief of the marvellous and the mysterious, his vigorous reason examined the evidence with jealousy. He was a sincere and zealous Christian, of high Church-ofEngland and monarchical principles, which he would not tamely suffer to be questioned ; and had, perhaps, at an early period, narrowed his mind somewhat too much, both as to religion and politicks. His being impressed with the danger of extreme latitude in either, though he was of a very independent spirit, occasioned his appearing somewhat unfavourable to the prevalence of that noble freedom of sentiment which is the best possession of man. Nor can it be denied, that he had many prejudices ; which, however, frequently suggested many of his pointed sayings, that rather shew a playfulness of fancy than any settled malignity. He was steady and inflexible in maintaining the obligations of religion and morality; both from a regard for the order of society, and from a veneration for the GREAT Source of all order; correct, nay stern in his taste; hard to please, and easily offended; impetuous and irritable in his temper, but of a most humane and benevolent heart," which shewed itself not only in
* In the Olla Podrida, a collection of Essays published at Osa ford, there is an admirable paper upon the character of Johnson, VOL. IV.
1784. a most liberal charity, as far as his circumstances I would allow, but in a thousand instances of active
benevolence. He was afflicted with a bodily disease, which made him often restless and frętful; and with a constitutional melancholy, the clouds of which darkened the brightness of his fancy, and gave a gloomy cast to his whole course of thinking: we, therefore, ought not to wonder at his sallies of impatience and passion at any time; especially when provoked by obtrusive ignorance, or presuming petulance; and allowance inust be made for his uttering hasty and satirical sallies even against his best friends. And, surely, when it is considered, that, " amidst sickness and sorrow,” he exerted his facul ties in so many works for the benefit of mankind, and particularly that he atchieved the great and admirable DICTIONARY of our language, we must be astonished at his resolution. The solemn text, “ of him to whom much is given, much will be required," seems to have been ever present to his mind, in a rigorous sense, and to have made him dissatisfied with his labours and acts of goodness, however comparatively great ; so that the unavoidable consciousness of his superiority was, in that respect, a cause of disquiet. He suffered so much from this, and from the gloom which perpetually haunted him, and inade solitude frightful, that it may be said of him, “ If in this life only he had hope, he was of all men most miserable.” He loved praise, when it was brought to him; but was too proud to seek for it. He was somewhat susceptible of flattery. As he was general and unconfined in his studies, he cannot 1784. be considered as master of any one particular science; but he had accumulated a vast and various collection of learning and knowledge, which was so arranged in his mind, as to be ever in readiness to be brought forth. But his superiority over other learned men consisted chiefly in what may be called the art of thinking, the art of using his mind; a certain continual power of seizing the useful substance of all that he knew, and exhibiting it in a clear and forcible manner; so that knowledge, which we often see to be no better than lumber in men of dull understanding, was, in him, true, evi. dent, and actual wisdom. His moral precepts are practical ; for they are drawn from an intimate acquaintance with human nature. His maxims carry conviction ; for they are founded on the basis of common sense, and a very attentive and minute survey of real life. His mind was so full of imagery, that he might have been perpetually a poet; yet it is remarkable, that, however rich his prose is in this respect, his poetical pieces, in general, have not much of that splendour, but are rather distinguished by strong sentiment, and acute observation, conveyed in harmonious and energetick verse, particularly in heroick couplets. Though usually grave, and even aweful in his deportment, he possessed uncommon and peculiar powers of wit and humour ; he frequently indulged himself in colloquial pleasantry; and the heartiest merriment was often en, joyed in his company; with this great advantage, that it was entirely free from any poisonous tincture of vice or impiety, it was salutary to those who shared in it. He had accustomed himself to such
written by the Reverend Dr. Horne, the last excellent Bishop of Norwich. The following passage is eminently happy :-" To reject wisdom, because the person of him who communicates it is uncouth, and his manners are inelegant;-what is it, but to throw away a pine-apple, and assign for a reason the roughness of its coat?
1784. accuracy in his common conversation, that he at all 20.75 times expressed his thoughts with great force, and an
* Though a perfect resemblance of Johnson is not to be found in any age, parts of his character are admirably expressed by Clarendon, in drawing that of Lord Falkland, whom the noble and toasterly historian describes at his seat near Oxford :" Such an immenseness of wit, such a solidity of judgement, so infinite a fancy, bound in by a most logical ratiocination. His acquaintance was cultivated by the most polite and accurate men, so that his house was an University in less volume, wbither they came, not so inuch for repose as study, and to examine and refine those grosser propositions, which laziness and consent made current in conversation." · Bayle's account of Menage may also be quoted as exceedingly applicable to the great subject of this work. “His illustrious friends erected a very glorious monument to him in the collection entitled Menagiana. Those who judge of things aright, wilt confess that this collection is very proper to shew the extent of genius and learning which was the character of Menage. And I may be bold to say, that the excellent works he published will not distinguish him from other learned mer só advantageously as this. To publish books of great learning, to make Greek and Latin verses exceedingly well turned, is not a common talent, I own; neither is it extremely rare. It is incor- parably more difficult to find men who can furnish discourse about an infinite number of things, and wbo can diversify them an hundred ways. How many authours are there, who are admired for their works, on account of the vast learning that is displayed in them, who are not able to sustain a conversation. Those who know Menage only by his books, might think he resembled those learned men: but if you shew the MBNAGIANA, you distinguish bim from them, and make him known by a talent which is given to very few learned men. There it appears that he was a man who spoke off-hand a thousand good things. His memory extended to what was ancient and modern; to the court and to the city ; to the dead and to the living languages ; to things serious and things jocose ; in a word, to a thousand sorts of sabjects. That which appeared a trifle to some readers of the Menagrana, who did not consider circumstances, caused admiration in other readers, who minded the difference between what a man speaks without preparation, and that which