UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD.

In Literis Humanioribus.

TERM, MICHAELMAS, 1835. In Literis Humanioribus.

CLASSIS I.

Claughton P. Brasenose.
Cotton, Wm. Christ Church.
Litton, Edward, Balliol.
Miller, John, Lincoln.
Tickell, George, Balliol.

Yonge, Charles, St. Mary Hall.

CLASSIS II.

Cane, Edw. Trinity.

Evans, Evan, Pembroke.

Freeland, Humphrey, Christ Church.

Godley, John, Christ Church.

Hannam, Thos. Magdalen Hall.

Hansell, Edw. Magdalen.

Lamb, Robert, St. John's.

Morris, Thos. Christ Church.

Brooks, Joseph, Brúsenose.
Fowle, Wm. Wadham,
Geare, Edw. Exeter.

Hill, George, Edmund Hall.
Leach, Thos. Merton.

Le Breton, Wm. Pembroke.
Muirhead, Jas, Bulliol.
Ormerod, Jas. Brasenose.
Scriven, Chas. Worcester.
Smith, Bernard, Magdalen.
Smith, Robert, Jesus.

CLASSIS IV.

Browne, Wm. Balliol.
Capes, John, Balliol.

Crockford, Wm. Brusenose.

Maidstone, Lord Viscount, Christ Church. Daubeny, Henry, Trinity.

Moore, John, Exeter.

Pearson, Geo. Christ Church.
Sawbridge, Edw. Balliol.
Spragge, Chas. Exeter.
Williams, Morris, Jesus.
Woolcombe, Louis, Pembroke.

CLASSIS III.

Barnes, Arthur, Christ Church.
Barnett, Henry, Christ Church.

Dunlop, Chas. Pembroke.
Entwistle, Arthur, Oriel.

Hulme, Geo. Balliol.
Pope, Septimus, Queen's.
Rothwell, Thos. Oriel.
Shute, Hardwicke, Pembroke.
Smith, Hinton, Wadham.
Smythies, Chas. Trinity.
Sweet, Chas. Balliol.
Williams, Jas, Pembroke.
Young, Richard, Oriel.

Latin Essay. De Jure Clientela apud Romanos. Roundell Palmer, Magdales. English Essay. The Influence of Ancient Oracles on Public and Private Life. J. B. Mozley, Oriel.

POETICAL PRIZES.

Latin: Julianus Imperator Templum_Hierosolymitanum instaurare aggreditur James Cowles Prichard, Trinity.

English: The Burning of Moscow. Wm. Robert Seymour Fitzgerald, Oriel.

Moderators.

Examiners.

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE.
EXAMINATIONS. MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS, 1835.

John Harrison Evans, M.A. John's.
Thos. Gaskin, M.A. Jesus.

Edwin Steventon, M.A. Corpus.
Francis Martin, M.A. Trinity.

LAW CASES AND NARRATIVES.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH,
FRIDAY, FEB. 13.
TRIAL AT BAR.

The King v. Gibbs Crawford
Antrobus, Esq.

THIS case arose out of the cir cumstances attendant upon the conviction of two men of the name of Garside and Mosley, for the murder of Mr. Ashton, in the county of Chester. The respective sheriff's of the city and county of Chester refused to execute them, and after several respites, they were brought up before the court of King's Bench in Michaelmas Term, and were then ordered to be hanged at Horsemonger-lane gaol, which order was duly executed. A motion was made for leave to file a criminal information against the defendant, the sheriff of the county, for having refused to execute these men according to the order of the judge of assize, Mr. Baron Parke; and a trial at bar was ordered.

The defendant sat within the Bar allotted for King's counsel.

The case for the crown was conducted by the Attorney-general, sir John Campbell and Mr. Wight

man.

For the defendant, Mr. Maule, Mr. Kelly, and Mr. Walesby, appeared.

Mr. Wightman stated, that this was an information filed by his Majesty's Attorney-general, which stated, that at the assizes held at Chester, on the 6th of August last, Garside and Mosley were tried

and convicted of murder, and were sentenced to be hanged on the 8th. of August, and that it was the duty of the defendant, as sheriff of the county, to execute them, but. that he had refused and neglected so to do.

The Attorney-general said, the simple question was this-did the office of sheriff of the county of Chester, impose on the defendant the duty of executing criminals, convicted in Chester. The sheriff, by the common law of the land, was bound to obey the orders of the Court. Undoubtedly, for many years, there was no instance of the sheriff of the county having executed a criminal; that duty had always been performed by the sheriff of the city of Chester, and the mode in which that duty was discharged was this: -The criminal was tried in the county court; when the day arrived for sentence to be carried into execution, he was taken to the boundary of the jurisdiction of the county of Chester, and was handed over by the constable of the Castle -in point of fact to the sheriffs of the city, and by them carried to the place of execution, within their jurisdiction, and there he suffered death. A section of the 11th of George IVth. and 1st of William IV., chap. 7, enacted, that from and after the commencement of that act, his majesty's writ should be directed and obeyed, and should extend and be exercised over and within the county of Chester, and the county of the.