« ElőzőTovább »
which consecrates selfishness by enthroning it in the struggle for existence above wisdom and virtue; and which views, alike unmoved and powerless of consolation, the agonies of remorse, the isolation of bereavement, and the yearnings of the saint after communion with Divine holiness? Only if free to F,refd?m
choose, is man capable of duty in any sense of the "o5cae,lsary
Mind and soul according well,
If man, it has been finely said, " be no higher in JfoTto"^' his destinies than the beast or the blade of errass, it animals in
0 his capa
might be better to be a beast or a blade of grass bility ^
0 consciousness of sin.
1 See Coleridge, A. R., p. 233. The fine lines of Juvenal will be readily remembered:—
Principio indulsit communis Conditor illis
than a man."1 But it is not so, brethren. The stork in the heavens may know her appointed times; the turtle, the crane, and the swallow may observe the time of their coming; and when they wing their flight may leave without remorse their unfledged young to die.2 They run their allotted course. But man, even though he perish, though sin becomes the law of his nature, and evil clings about him like a robe, is great in the ruin of his fall. He knows why he perishes,3 and worships, in the bitterness of his soul, the purity, the nobleness, the love which he has forfeited for himself for ever.
1 Prof. Goldwin Smith, lectures on the Study of History, p. 12. * See Mr. Darwin, Descent of Man.
'"Quando autem melior homo et pecoribus praponendus? Quando novit quod facit."—August, de Ord., II. xix.; and again, Civ. D., xxii.: "Siout oecitas oculi vitium est, et idem ileum indicat ad lumen videndum oculum esse creatum, ac per hoc etiam ipso vitio suo excellentius ostendit ut caeteris membris membrum caput luminis (non enim alia causa esset vitium ejus carere lumine): ita natura quae fruebatur Deo, optimam se institutam docet etiam ipso vitio, quo ideo misera est, quia non fruitur Deo." Compare Chateaubriand, Genie da Christ., I. 208. "Pourquoi le bceuf ne fait-il pas," &c. Strauss, Leben Je.su, II. 697, admits that while animals are but races, men have the knowledge that they are a race. Hence arises the possibility of history with all its consequences. Cf. Dorner, Hist. Prot. Th., II. 370.
"Wherefore should they say among the people,—Where is their Godt"— 3ofI it. 17.
§ 1. T T would be but futile to build any ar^u- truth
'I J 0 of a Divine
x ment upon the past or the future of the Provi
. , dence es
Faith of Christ, were the fundamental truth denied sentiai to of the controlling Providence of G-od. As religion and peritself is a thing not worth contending for, when religion, free-will in man is given up, so Christianity, devoid of a special and personal relation to the Almighty in His work of grace (which may be said to be in respect of all Pagan religions its cardinal and characteristic doctrine), is a shadow without substance.1 It becomes, then, of the first importance to inquire on what grounds the belief in a special Providence is held to be in course of being sur
1 "Si Dei Providentia non prfesidet rebus humanis, nihil est do religionc satagendum."—August., VtH. Cred., exvi. "Deum nisi ct esseet hutnanis mcntibus opitulari credimus, nec quaerero quidem ipsam veram rcligionem debemus."—lb., c. xiii. Comp. Lnctant., Instit. Div., VII, c. vi. See Waterland, Discourse, of Fundamentals ( Works, V. 80). "The theory of Providence," writes Mr. Iltitton, Essays, I. 88, " is one which, unless harmonized with general moral and physical laws, can assuredly stand no longer; and yet it is one which has exerted so profound an influence over every Christian mind from the earliest Christian ages to our own, that to part with it would be to give up the very life of religion." "' Point de religion sans priere'a dit cc memo Voltaire. Rien de plus evident; et parunc consequence necessairc, point de priere, point de religion."—De Maistre, SoMes, p. 158.