Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew
The essays in this volume arose out of the Society of Biblical Literature section on linguistics and Biblical Hebrew and have been selected to provide a summary and statement of the state of the question with regard to a number of areas of investigation. The sixteen articles are organized into sections on phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, discourse analysis, historical/comparative linguistics, and graphemics.
1 - 3 találat összesen 25 találatból.
(The masc. sing. form [©omor] and the fem. sing. form [©imri) are derived from this
base form through rules of vowel reduction/deletion and, in the latter case, vowel
raising, on which see further below.) When a high vocalic suffix, such as /i/ or ...
a — is C [—str] [-back] Noting that /a/ is the lowest and only back vowel in Hebrew
, one may incorporate a greater degree of explanation into the rule by labeling a
as [+low] (and coincidentally [+back]). In other words, /a/ is not attenuated to i ...
4: The nonoperation of my rule on the substantivized feminine singular forms “
qattil-t is rather more difficult to explain, but it may be suggested that the bête
noire of Semitic historical phonology, stress, had something to do with it. If we
Mit mondanak mások - Írjon ismertetőt
E J Revell The Development of Ségól in an Open
Gregory Enos Phonological Considerations in the Study
14 további fejezet nem látható