of his powerful mind remained to the last unimpaired; and when the tender thread of his mortal career was broken, he was gathered to his fathers as a shock of corn to the garner fully ripe, ripe in- deed for that glory which it hath not entered into the heart of man adequately to conceive.
His remains were interred near those of his parents, in the Bishop's Chancel of Old St. Chad's Church, Shrewsbury, and on the site formerly occupied by the handsome altar tomb in memory of Speaker Onslow, removed some time since to the Abbey Church in the same town.
Dr. Scott married his cousin Anne, daughter of the Rev. Daniel Austin, M. A. Rector of Berrington, co. Salop, who survives him, and by whom he had issue a son and a daughter. The former died young and the latter, Anna Doro- thea, married R. W. Stokes, Esq. of London.
Dr. Scott had four brothers, three of whom entered early in the Honourable East India Company's Service. John the eldest attained the rank of Major, and interested himself much in the cele- brated trial of Warren Hastings, esq.; on succeeding to some extensive estates, he took the name of Waring, and died in 1819. Richard entered the service as a Cadet in 1768, was promoted to the rank of Lieut.-Col. and retired on full pay in 1797. In the course of his services he distinguished himself under the cele- brated Lieut.-Gen. Sir Eyre Coote, K. B. in the war with Hyder Ali Khan, and under the Marquess Cornwallis in the war with Tippoo Sultaun. Henry Scott, Esq. of Beslow Hall, co. Salop, the only survivor of the brothers, and who also held a distinguished situation in the Bengal establishment, proposed about three years ago to publish the Military Memoirs of Lieut.-Col. Richard Scott, from the journal which that gentleman kept from his arrival in Bengal to the year 1793, and the mass of manuscripts he has left This proposition not meeting with sufficient encouragement has been relinquished, and we are consequently deprived of much valuable information respecting the public events of the war- fare with the French, Dutch, Hyder Ali, the Mahratta States, and Tippoo Sul-
The youngest son, Foliott, was a mer- cer in London, and with his sister Doro- thea, who married Mr. Stokes, father of Dr. Scott's son-in-law, has been de-
SHELTON, Thomas, Esq., Clerk of the Peace, Clerk of the Arraigns, Registrar of the Lord Mayor's Court, and Coroner for the City of London; at the Sessions' House, Old Bailey; July 10. 1829; aged 74.
This highly useful and excellent of- ficer, and amiable man, was never mar- ried, and is supposed to have died very rich. He was one of the most inde- pendent men in the Corporation. He never asked a favour of any of his supe- riors; he never deviated one step from his path of duty to perform a favour for them. The despatch of business in his office was regular and able; and as a mark of attention to their excellent of- ficer, the Court of Common Council suspended their standing orders, and unanimously elected his nephew, Mr. John Clark (who had been many years his assistant) Clerk of the Arraigns. Mr. Alderman Lucas, in bringing the subject before the Court, said, that he held in his hand letters from the Lord Chief Justice, and others of the Judges, to Mr. Clark, expressing their sense of the great loss sustained by the public in the death of Mr. Shelton, and their opinion of Mr. Clark's qualifications for the office of Clerk of the Arraigns. Mr. Shelton's remains were interred Datchet, attended by the Lord Mayor, Recorder, and other civic officers. Gentleman's Magazine.
SHORE, Samuel, Esq.; Nov. 16. 1828; at Meersbrook, near Sheffield; aged 90.
When we have to speak of the early years of one whose life was extended through three ages of man, we are car- ried back to times, and circumstances, and characters, which may well be sup- posed to have never come within the knowledge of the great majority of our readers, or to have passed from their re- membrance. Yet some among them may still be able to recollect the father of Mr. Shore; for he, like his son, found of that heavenly Wisdom to which both were devoted, that length of days is in her right hand. He lived, in the latter part of his life, at Meersbrook, in the parish of Norton, an estate which he had purchased; but in the early pe- riods of his life he had been an inhabit- ant of Sheffield, and there his son, the subject of this memoir, was born.
The elder Mr. Shore had been en- gaged very extensively in commercial
undertakings connected with the mi- neral riches of his district. Some he himself originated. In others, he fol- lowed up the well laid designs of his father, who lived till 1751, and was, in his day, a most enterprising and suc- cessful merchant. But the foundation of the fortune of the family might be said to be laid still earlier, and to be connected even with the feudal state of Sheffield; for the writer of this memoir has heard the late Mr. Shore speak of the large purchases made by his grand- father, when the fine forests of Hallam- shire were cut down, as having contri- buted to the advancement of the family.
In the two generations which pre- ceded the gentleman lately deceased, the heads of the family were distinguish- ed not more by that attention to their extensive private concerns, which was essential to success, than by an attention to the public interests of the place in which they resided, such as became good townsmen. They were very active members of the Town's Trust. In every public undertaking originated in their time they were foremost, and, in particular, the improvement of the River Don Navigation, a measure which has contributed so greatly to the prosperity of Sheffield, owed much at the beginning to the skill and energy of the first Mr. Samuel Shore. To assiduity, integrity, and public spirit, there was added in them an earnest concern for religion. They were amongst those many persons at Sheffield, who, not willing to conform to the restrictions which the Act of Uniformity imposes upon freedom of enquiry in affairs of religion and the public expression of devotional senti- ment, formed themselves into a society of Protestant Dissenters. The chapel in which they met for worship, now called the Upper Chapel, in Norfolk Street, was built in 1700, and the first Mr. Samuel Shore was one of the founders and original trustees. second Mr. Samuel Shore was, through life, a member of that congregation, and by the minister of that congregation, Mr. John Wadsworth, was the late Mr. Shore baptized on Feb. 14. 1738. He was born on the 5th day of that month; but to fix precisely the period of his birth it is necessary to say the year was 1737-8. He was the second son; but the eldest, whose name was Robert Diggles, so called after the name of his grandfather, a merchant at Liver- pool, died in his early infancy.
At a very early age, Mr. Shore was placed for education under the care of the Rev. Daniel Lowe, a dissenting mi- nister then lately settled at Norton. Mr. Lowe's school enjoyed, during many years, a high reputation. of the dissenting youth of the better condition, in the counties of York, Not- tingham, and Derby, were educated in it. Mr. Shore was his pupil for seven years; so that his earliest recollected impressions would be connected with Norton; a place with which, as we shall afterwards see, he became more closely united.
The Dissenters of England, in the early years of Mr. Shore, had made no provision for the education of their youth in the higher departments of knowledge. Their academies were con- fined to the education of their ministers. Those amongst them, therefore, who re- garded the ancient and splendid seats of learning and science as fenced by bar- riers which no Nonconformist ought to pass, were in a manner compelled to seek, at some risk, in a foreign land, the advantages which were denied at home. When sixteen, Mr. Shore was accord- ingly placed in a French academy in London, as a preparatory step to his being sent to Germany. In the summer of 1754, he proceeded to the Continent; and after travelling through Holland, Westphalia, Hesse-Cassel, Hanover, Brandenburgh, Silesia, and Saxony, he returned to Brunswick, and was there entered a student of Charles College in that city, founded by Charles Duke of Brunswick. There Mr. Shore remained for three years; in the course of which he made excursions to the Hartz moun- tains, to Hanover, and Gottingen. The amiableness of his manners, the cor- rectness of his behaviour, and the assi- duity of his attention to the duties of the College, gained him universal esteem; but the particular favour with which he was regarded by the Abbé Jerusalem, a person of considerable note at that time in Germany, who, when Rector of the College of Brunswick, assisted him in the kindest manner with his counsels and instruction, was a subject ever after of grateful recollection.
Mr. Shore left Brunswick when the French army entered the place in 1757, and returned to England.
There were those who, at this period, looked forward with an earnest and as- sured expectation to that high and ho- nourable course of thought and action
of which the termination has only now been witnessed; and, in particular, the friends of civil and religious liberty looked to the sense and knowledge, the spirit and activity of Mr. Shore, as marking him out as one who would take a lead in the defence of the best interests of the human race. They were not mistaken in these anticipa- tions.
It happened to Mr. Shore to spend nearly the whole of his long life near the place of his birth. In the year 1759 he married the elder of two daughters of Joseph Offley, Esq., a gentleman of ancient family, who had resided at Nor- ton Hall, and had been the Lord of that Manor. Mr. Offley left two daughters and one son; but the son dying in early life, and leaving no issue, the daughters became coheiresses to con- siderable estates in different counties. On the partition of them, Norton Hall, the park, demesne, and manor, were assigned to Mr. and Mrs. Shore. The younger daughter became the wife of Francis Edmunds, Esq. of Worsbo- rough.
Norton Hall, which thus became the seat of Mr. Shore, was, in its ancient state, one of the picturesque old houses of our country gentry of the higher order. Some portions of it were of very high antiquity. Others appeared to have been built about the first of the Stuart reigns; and some of the best apartments had been added by the Offleys. There was a fine old entrance hall with a gallery, and in this room the Nonconformists of Norton and the neighbourhood had been long accus- tomed to assemble for public worship, and continued to do so in the time of Mr. Shore. Great improvements have since been made in the house and grounds; and a chapel has been erected at a little distance from the mansion, in which, so long as he was able, Mr. Shore was duly to be seen a devout and hum- ble worshipper. During the life of Mrs. Shore, Norton Hall was their constant residence. She died there in 1781; and when some years after Mr. Shore's eldest son had married, Norton Hall became his residence; and Mr. Shore took up his abode at Meers- brook, which had been the seat of his father, at a short distance from the vil- lage of Norton, where the remainder of his life was passed, and where he died.
The public life of Mr. Shore began early; for as long ago as the year 1761
he served the office of High Sheriff of the county of Derby. He acted for some time in the Commission of the Peace; but having never qualified ac- cording to the terms imposed by the now abrogated Test Act, nor being will- ing to qualify, he retired from the Com- mission, and resumed, so far, a private station. His public services are, there- fore, rather to be looked for in what could be done by a truly conscientious Nonconformist, and his rewards not so much in public honours as in the jucun- da recordationes of his own mind. the place of his birth he was always a liberal benefactor. The Sheffield In- firmary and Schools were the constant objects of his attention and his bounty. When there was any peculiar pressure of distress, his hand was always open. When projects were devised for the ge- neral benefit of the population, Mr. Shore evinced that he had inherited the fortune and public spirit of his fathers. He was a member of the Trusts of most of the old societies of Nonconformists in his neighbourhood, and one to whom, in all affairs of importance, especial de- ference was wont to be paid. He was also, through his whole life, a very active member of Trusts connected with Non- conformity, and embracing higher ob- jects than the interests of particular so- cieties; and, in particular, in the Trust of the Hollis Charity in which Sheffield so largely participates; and in that still more important Trust, to which are com- mitted the lands bequeathed by the re- lict of Sir John Hewley of York, for the education of ministers and the support of dissenting worship in the North of England, he was, through life, a very active and efficient member. To the Nonconformist body of England he was, indeed, an invaluable friend-one who was ever attentive to its interests- one who could represent it with dignity on all occasions and by whom, per- haps, more than by any other private individual, it became connected with public men, and with those in high sta- tions who are called to legislate respect- ing it. The mind of Mr. Shore was, through life, earnestly directed upon means for affording suitable opportuni- ties for education to the ministers and those of the dissenting youth at large for whom more was required than was presented in the ordinary schools. The Dissenting Academies at Warrington, at Hackney, and at York, were, in succession, objects of his constant so-
Gray, and one whose taste gave beauty, and poetry celebrity, to that cheerful village.
licitude and his liberal bounty. belonged to that class of Nonconformists long called Presbyterian, almost the only class formerly known in the coun- ties of York and Derby. The right of religious enquiry which that body had always maintained, and the duty of making an open profession of principles, which had passed from opinions into the class of demonstrated truths which had been always enforced by its minis- ters, had produced, in the early years of Mr. Shore's life, a material change from the doctrinal opinions of the founders of Presbyterian Noncon- formity. In these changes, Mr. Shore had gone with the body with which he was connected; if it may not rather be said, that his enlightened and enquiring mind showed to others the track of truth as it is laid open by the proper use and better knowledge of the Holy Scrip- tures, and that his fearless and inde- pendent spirit - his deep feeling of the importance of religious truth his sense of the duty of making an open pro- fession of it—did not animate and en- courage others in this necessary, but somewhat difficult, duty. In that great crisis in the religious history of our country, when the application to Parlia- ment by a great and respectable body of the Clergy of the Church of England for some change in the required subscrip- tion, to make it more congenial to the Protestant principles of liberty, of reli- gious enquiry, and the sufficiency of Scripture, was rejected by an over- whelming majority, and when, in con- sequence of it, a beneficed clergyman of Yorkshire, of the highest character, gave up his preferment, withdrew himself from the church, and opened a chapel in London for public worship on Uni- tarian principles, - Mr. Shore, and the neighbour and great friend of the family, Mr. Newton of Norton House, were amongst the first to encourage and assist Mr. Lindsey. That truly conscientious, and truly learned and excellent man, found, indeed, his best friends amongst those who had been trained in the school of Nonconformity. In his journey from Catterick to London, a pilgrimage which will be looked upon with increasing in- terest as time advances and brings forth more and more of the consequences of that event, Mr. Lindsey spent a whole week in this neighbourhood. He was, during that time, the guest of his friend Mr. Mason, who was residing on his rectory of Aston, the biographer of
To Dr. Priestley, a man of still bolder and more ardent mind, Mr. Shore also extended a friendly patronage; and Dr. Priestley has inscribed to him his His- tory of the Christian Church, as to one "whose conduct had long proved him to be a steady friend of Christianity, and whose object it had been to preserve it as unmixed as possible with every thing that has a tendency to corrupt and de- base it."
Mr. Shore was not less active in his endeavours to regain for Protestant Dissenters the rights of which they had been deprived in the reign of Charles II., and which were but imperfectly restored at the time of the Revolution. He not only concurred in all the ap- plications which were made to Parlia- ment, but he exerted to the utmost that high influence which he possessed in the exalted ranks of society. He lived to witness the success of these applications; and some of his latest thoughts were em- ployed upon this gratifying proof of the increased liberality of the times, and this advancement in the general liberty of the subject.
Throughout life, Mr. Shore looked with solicitude to the popular parts of our well-balanced Constitution, which he thought in more danger of injury than the monarchical or aristocratical portions of it. He looked with an ap- prehension in which many great and wise men agreed with him, to an in- crease of the influence of the Crown too great for the safety of the people; and in his character of a citizen of this country he thought it his duty to support all measures which tended to maintain, or even to give an increase, correspond- ent to the increased influence of the Crown, to the rights and privileges of the commonalty. In his own county of Derby he was the supporter of the house of Cavendish, because that house was a supporter of the principles which he thought essential to the maintenance of the public weal. And in the county of his birth, though not of his residence, and where he possessed great interests, he was the supporter of that public in- terest of which Sir George Savile might, in his day, be accounted the illustrious representative. When the principles of those who leaned to the monarchical, and of those who leaned to the popular, part of the Constitution, became posited
on the great question of Parliamentary Reform, Mr. Shore was among the fore- most of those eminent persons in the county of York who formed the York- shire Association of former times; and when the great Yorkshire Petition for Reform was agreed upon, he was one of the deputies to whom the care of it was committed. A list of the members of that Association who met at York is be- fore me. But few are at this day living. Of the two deputies with Mr. Shore, the Rev. Christopher Wyvill and Sir James Innes, who became afterwards Duke of Roxburgh, both are dead.
Through the period of alarm, Mr. Shore still retained his former principles. He was attached to the political party of which Mr. Fox might be regarded as at that time the representative; but it was entirely an attachment lying in commu- nity of sentiment - an attachment so truly independent, that it might be at once broken when the community of sentiment had disappeared.
In later periods, Mr. Shore has shown the importance with which he regarded the question of the improvement of our representation, and the infusion of a greater number of really elected mem- bers into the Commons' House of Par- liament. To what extent his views of Reform were carried, or what modifica- tion they may have undergone in the long period during which the question has been under discussion, the writer has not the means of judging. But the same principle which urged him to support popular interests, since, by so doing, he would best support the balance of the Constitution, would have induced him equally to maintain the just rights of the Throne, had he seen them invaded. And when the county armed in its de. fence in the year 1803, Mr. Shore ap- peared in the novel character of a mili- tary officer, and raised a company of volunteers chiefly from amongst his own tenantry and dependants, whose services were accepted by the Crown.
Activity of body, no less than activity and energy of mind, belonged to Mr. Shore. He enjoyed through his long life an enviable state of health, and that evenness and elasticity of spirits which belong peculiarly to those who are con- scious of pure intention, prone to benefi- cial action, and who have the hope which religion gives. He sunk very gradually into the tomb. His was truly a green old age. There was the freshness and the floral hue of youth upon his coun-
tenance; but the bent form and the few crisp hairs of silvery whiteness showed that he was a man of many days. Mr. Shore had married, about the time when he settled at Meersbrook, the only daughter of Freeman Flower, Esq. of Clapham, in Surrey; and his declining years were soothed by conjugal affection and by filial tenderness, and he has de- parted full of days and honour, enjoying the undiminished regard of his friends, and the high admiration of all who can honour worth and a wise consistency.
On Monday, the 24th of November, 1828, his remains were committed to the family vault in Norton Church. By the desire of the deceased, the funeral was quite private; and the only gentlemen, not relations, present on the occasion, were Messrs. Read, Bagshawe, Mills; the Rev. J. Williams, formerly Minister of the Chapel at Norton; and the pre- sent Minister, the Rev. H. H. Piper.
On Sunday, Nov. 30. a funeral ser- mon was preached by the Rev. H. H. Piper, at the Chapel at Norton, to a numerous congregation; and the follow- ing Sunday, the chapel, in the morning, was closed, and the family and congrega- tion attended the church, when the Vicar delivered a most useful and impressive discourse from Isaiah, xl. 6. He paid a just and liberal tribute to the virtues of the deceased. Sermons were also preached by the Rev. N. Philipps, D. D., and the Rev. Peter Wright, at the Uni- tarian Chapels in Norfolk Street, and at the Music-Hall, Sheffield, which bore testimony to the amiable and excellent character of the deceased. Sheffield Independent.
SNEYD, Walter, Esq.; at Keel Hall, near Newcastle-under-Lyme; June 23. 1829; in his 78th year.
Mr. Sneyd was the descendant of an ancient Staffordshire family, whose prin- cipal seat was formerly at Bradwell, in that county, but in the reign of Eliza- beth was transferred to Keel.
Erdeswicke (whose "Survey " was written circa 1580) thus details the origin of the family :-" Somewhat east- erly of Talk (a place on the north-west extremity of Staffordshire) stands Brad- well, y seat of Raufe, ye son of Sir Wm. Sneyd, Kt. who is y fourth man from the raiser of that family, William by name, a citizen of Chester. This Wil liam, y Chester man, was ye son of Nicholas, y son of Richard, to which Richard, or Richard his father, y Lord Audley gave Bradwell, as I have heard,
« ElőzőTovább » |