Oldalképek
PDF
ePub

of his powerful mind remained to the
last unimpaired; and when the tender
thread of his mortal career was broken,
he was gathered to his fathers as a shock
of corn to the garner fully ripe, ripe in-
deed for that glory which it hath not
entered into the heart of man adequately
to conceive.

His remains were interred near those
of his parents, in the Bishop's Chancel
of Old St. Chad's Church, Shrewsbury,
and on the site formerly occupied by
the handsome altar tomb in memory of
Speaker Onslow, removed some time
since to the Abbey Church in the same
town.

Dr. Scott married his cousin Anne,
daughter of the Rev. Daniel Austin,
M. A. Rector of Berrington, co. Salop,
who survives him, and by whom he had
issue a son and a daughter. The former
died young and the latter, Anna Doro-
thea, married R. W. Stokes, Esq. of
London.

Dr. Scott had four brothers, three of
whom entered early in the Honourable
East India Company's Service. John
the eldest attained the rank of Major,
and interested himself much in the cele-
brated trial of Warren Hastings, esq.;
on succeeding to some extensive estates,
he took the name of Waring, and died
in 1819. Richard entered the service as
a Cadet in 1768, was promoted to the
rank of Lieut.-Col. and retired on full
pay in 1797. In the course of his services
he distinguished himself under the cele-
brated Lieut.-Gen. Sir Eyre Coote, K. B.
in the war with Hyder Ali Khan, and
under the Marquess Cornwallis in the
war with Tippoo Sultaun. Henry Scott,
Esq. of Beslow Hall, co. Salop, the only
survivor of the brothers, and who also
held a distinguished situation in the
Bengal establishment, proposed about
three years ago to publish the Military
Memoirs of Lieut.-Col. Richard Scott,
from the journal which that gentleman
kept from his arrival in Bengal to the
year 1793, and the mass of manuscripts
he has left This proposition not meeting
with sufficient encouragement has been
relinquished, and we are consequently
deprived of much valuable information
respecting the public events of the war-
fare with the French, Dutch, Hyder Ali,
the Mahratta States, and Tippoo Sul-

taun.

The youngest son, Foliott, was a mer-
cer in London, and with his sister Doro-
thea, who married Mr. Stokes, father of
Dr. Scott's son-in-law, has been de-

[blocks in formation]

SHELTON, Thomas, Esq., Clerk
of the Peace, Clerk of the Arraigns,
Registrar of the Lord Mayor's Court,
and Coroner for the City of London; at
the Sessions' House, Old Bailey; July
10. 1829; aged 74.

This highly useful and excellent of-
ficer, and amiable man, was never mar-
ried, and is supposed to have died very
rich. He was one of the most inde-
pendent men in the Corporation. He
never asked a favour of any of his supe-
riors; he never deviated one step from
his path of duty to perform a favour for
them. The despatch of business in his
office was regular and able; and as a
mark of attention to their excellent of-
ficer, the Court of Common Council
suspended their standing orders, and
unanimously elected his nephew, Mr.
John Clark (who had been many years
his assistant) Clerk of the Arraigns.
Mr. Alderman Lucas, in bringing the
subject before the Court, said, that he held
in his hand letters from the Lord Chief
Justice, and others of the Judges, to
Mr. Clark, expressing their sense of the
great loss sustained by the public in the
death of Mr. Shelton, and their opinion
of Mr. Clark's qualifications for the
office of Clerk of the Arraigns. Mr.
Shelton's remains were interred
Datchet, attended by the Lord Mayor,
Recorder, and other civic officers.
Gentleman's Magazine.

at

SHORE, Samuel, Esq.; Nov. 16.
1828; at Meersbrook, near Sheffield;
aged 90.

When we have to speak of the early
years of one whose life was extended
through three ages of man, we are car-
ried back to times, and circumstances,
and characters, which may well be sup-
posed to have never come within the
knowledge of the great majority of our
readers, or to have passed from their re-
membrance. Yet some among them
may still be able to recollect the father
of Mr. Shore; for he, like his son,
found of that heavenly Wisdom to
which both were devoted, that length of
days is in her right hand. He lived, in
the latter part of his life, at Meersbrook,
in the parish of Norton, an estate which
he had purchased; but in the early pe-
riods of his life he had been an inhabit-
ant of Sheffield, and there his son, the
subject of this memoir, was born.

The elder Mr. Shore had been en-
gaged very extensively in commercial

undertakings connected with the mi-
neral riches of his district. Some he
himself originated. In others, he fol-
lowed up the well laid designs of his
father, who lived till 1751, and was, in
his day, a most enterprising and suc-
cessful merchant. But the foundation
of the fortune of the family might be
said to be laid still earlier, and to be
connected even with the feudal state of
Sheffield; for the writer of this memoir
has heard the late Mr. Shore speak of
the large purchases made by his grand-
father, when the fine forests of Hallam-
shire were cut down, as having contri-
buted to the advancement of the family.

In the two generations which pre-
ceded the gentleman lately deceased,
the heads of the family were distinguish-
ed not more by that attention to their
extensive private concerns, which was
essential to success, than by an attention
to the public interests of the place in
which they resided, such as became good
townsmen. They were very active
members of the Town's Trust. In
every public undertaking originated in
their time they were foremost, and, in
particular, the improvement of the River
Don Navigation, a measure which has
contributed so greatly to the prosperity
of Sheffield, owed much at the beginning
to the skill and energy of the first Mr.
Samuel Shore. To assiduity, integrity,
and public spirit, there was added in
them an earnest concern for religion.
They were amongst those many persons
at Sheffield, who, not willing to conform
to the restrictions which the Act of
Uniformity imposes upon freedom of
enquiry in affairs of religion and the
public expression of devotional senti-
ment, formed themselves into a society
of Protestant Dissenters. The chapel
in which they met for worship, now
called the Upper Chapel, in Norfolk
Street, was built in 1700, and the first
Mr. Samuel Shore was one of the
founders and original trustees.
second Mr. Samuel Shore was, through
life, a member of that congregation,
and by the minister of that congregation,
Mr. John Wadsworth, was the late
Mr. Shore baptized on Feb. 14. 1738.
He was born on the 5th day of that
month; but to fix precisely the period
of his birth it is necessary to say the
year was 1737-8. He was the second
son; but the eldest, whose name was
Robert Diggles, so called after the name
of his grandfather, a merchant at Liver-
pool, died in his early infancy.

The

Most

At a very early age, Mr. Shore was
placed for education under the care of
the Rev. Daniel Lowe, a dissenting mi-
nister then lately settled at Norton.
Mr. Lowe's school enjoyed, during
many years, a high reputation.
of the dissenting youth of the better
condition, in the counties of York, Not-
tingham, and Derby, were educated in
it. Mr. Shore was his pupil for seven
years; so that his earliest recollected
impressions would be connected with
Norton; a place with which, as we shall
afterwards see, he became more closely
united.

The Dissenters of England, in the
early years of Mr. Shore, had made no
provision for the education of their
youth in the higher departments of
knowledge. Their academies were con-
fined to the education of their ministers.
Those amongst them, therefore, who re-
garded the ancient and splendid seats of
learning and science as fenced by bar-
riers which no Nonconformist ought to
pass, were in a manner compelled to
seek, at some risk, in a foreign land, the
advantages which were denied at home.
When sixteen, Mr. Shore was accord-
ingly placed in a French academy in
London, as a preparatory step to his
being sent to Germany. In the summer
of 1754, he proceeded to the Continent;
and after travelling through Holland,
Westphalia, Hesse-Cassel, Hanover,
Brandenburgh, Silesia, and Saxony, he
returned to Brunswick, and was there
entered a student of Charles College in
that city, founded by Charles Duke of
Brunswick. There Mr. Shore remained
for three years; in the course of which
he made excursions to the Hartz moun-
tains, to Hanover, and Gottingen. The
amiableness of his manners, the cor-
rectness of his behaviour, and the assi-
duity of his attention to the duties of
the College, gained him universal esteem;
but the particular favour with which he
was regarded by the Abbé Jerusalem, a
person of considerable note at that time
in Germany, who, when Rector of the
College of Brunswick, assisted him in
the kindest manner with his counsels
and instruction, was a subject ever after
of grateful recollection.

Mr. Shore left Brunswick when the
French army entered the place in 1757,
and returned to England.

There were those who, at this period,
looked forward with an earnest and as-
sured expectation to that high and ho-
nourable course of thought and action

of which the termination has only now
been witnessed; and, in particular, the
friends of civil and religious liberty
looked to the sense and knowledge, the
spirit and activity of Mr. Shore, as
marking him out as one who would
take a lead in the defence of the best
interests of the human race. They
were not mistaken in these anticipa-
tions.

It happened to Mr. Shore to spend
nearly the whole of his long life near
the place of his birth. In the year 1759
he married the elder of two daughters
of Joseph Offley, Esq., a gentleman of
ancient family, who had resided at Nor-
ton Hall, and had been the Lord of
that Manor. Mr. Offley left two
daughters and one son; but the son
dying in early life, and leaving no issue,
the daughters became coheiresses to con-
siderable estates in different counties.
On the partition of them, Norton Hall,
the park, demesne, and manor, were
assigned to Mr. and Mrs. Shore. The
younger daughter became the wife of
Francis Edmunds, Esq. of Worsbo-
rough.

Norton Hall, which thus became the
seat of Mr. Shore, was, in its ancient
state, one of the picturesque old houses
of our country gentry of the higher
order. Some portions of it were of
very high antiquity. Others appeared to
have been built about the first of the
Stuart reigns; and some of the best
apartments had been added by the
Offleys. There was a fine old entrance
hall with a gallery, and in this room
the Nonconformists of Norton and the
neighbourhood had been long accus-
tomed to assemble for public worship,
and continued to do so in the time of
Mr. Shore. Great improvements have
since been made in the house and
grounds; and a chapel has been erected
at a little distance from the mansion, in
which, so long as he was able, Mr. Shore
was duly to be seen a devout and hum-
ble worshipper. During the life of
Mrs. Shore, Norton Hall was their
constant residence.
She died there in
1781; and when some years after Mr.
Shore's eldest son had married, Norton
Hall became his residence; and Mr.
Shore took up his abode at Meers-
brook, which had been the seat of his
father, at a short distance from the vil-
lage of Norton, where the remainder of
his life was passed, and where he died.

The public life of Mr. Shore began
early; for as long ago as the year 1761

To

he served the office of High Sheriff of
the county of Derby. He acted for
some time in the Commission of the
Peace; but having never qualified ac-
cording to the terms imposed by the
now abrogated Test Act, nor being will-
ing to qualify, he retired from the Com-
mission, and resumed, so far, a private
station. His public services are, there-
fore, rather to be looked for in what
could be done by a truly conscientious
Nonconformist, and his rewards not so
much in public honours as in the jucun-
da recordationes of his own mind.
the place of his birth he was always a
liberal benefactor. The Sheffield In-
firmary and Schools were the constant
objects of his attention and his bounty.
When there was any peculiar pressure
of distress, his hand was always open.
When projects were devised for the ge-
neral benefit of the population, Mr.
Shore evinced that he had inherited the
fortune and public spirit of his fathers.
He was a member of the Trusts of most
of the old societies of Nonconformists
in his neighbourhood, and one to whom,
in all affairs of importance, especial de-
ference was wont to be paid. He was
also, through his whole life, a very active
member of Trusts connected with Non-
conformity, and embracing higher ob-
jects than the interests of particular so-
cieties; and, in particular, in the Trust
of the Hollis Charity in which Sheffield
so largely participates; and in that still
more important Trust, to which are com-
mitted the lands bequeathed by the re-
lict of Sir John Hewley of York, for the
education of ministers and the support
of dissenting worship in the North of
England, he was, through life, a very
active and efficient member. To the
Nonconformist body of England he
was, indeed, an invaluable friend-one
who was ever attentive to its interests-
one who could represent it with dignity
on all occasions and by whom, per-
haps, more than by any other private
individual, it became connected with
public men, and with those in high sta-
tions who are called to legislate respect-
ing it. The mind of Mr. Shore was,
through life, earnestly directed upon
means for affording suitable opportuni-
ties for education to the ministers and
those of the dissenting youth at large
for whom more was required than was
presented in the ordinary schools. The
Dissenting Academies at Warrington,
at Hackney, and at York, were, in
succession, objects of his constant so-

-

-

He

Gray, and one whose taste gave beauty,
and poetry celebrity, to that cheerful
village.

licitude and his liberal bounty.
belonged to that class of Nonconformists
long called Presbyterian, almost the
only class formerly known in the coun-
ties of York and Derby. The right of
religious enquiry which that body had
always maintained, and the duty of
making an open profession of principles,
which had passed from opinions into
the class of demonstrated truths which
had been always enforced by its minis-
ters, had produced, in the early years
of Mr. Shore's life, a material change
from the doctrinal opinions of the
founders of Presbyterian Noncon-
formity. In these changes, Mr. Shore
had gone with the body with which he
was connected; if it may not rather be
said, that his enlightened and enquiring
mind showed to others the track of
truth as it is laid open by the proper use
and better knowledge of the Holy Scrip-
tures, and that his fearless and inde-
pendent spirit - his deep feeling of the
importance of religious truth his sense
of the duty of making an open pro-
fession of it—did not animate and en-
courage others in this necessary, but
somewhat difficult, duty. In that great
crisis in the religious history of our
country, when the application to Parlia-
ment by a great and respectable body of
the Clergy of the Church of England for
some change in the required subscrip-
tion, to make it more congenial to the
Protestant principles of liberty, of reli-
gious enquiry, and the sufficiency of
Scripture, was rejected by an over-
whelming majority, and when, in con-
sequence of it, a beneficed clergyman of
Yorkshire, of the highest character, gave
up his preferment, withdrew himself
from the church, and opened a chapel
in London for public worship on Uni-
tarian principles, - Mr. Shore, and the
neighbour and great friend of the family,
Mr. Newton of Norton House, were
amongst the first to encourage and assist
Mr. Lindsey. That truly conscientious,
and truly learned and excellent man,
found, indeed, his best friends amongst
those who had been trained in the school
of Nonconformity. In his journey from
Catterick to London, a pilgrimage which
will be looked upon with increasing in-
terest as time advances and brings forth
more and more of the consequences of
that event, Mr. Lindsey spent a whole
week in this neighbourhood. He was,
during that time, the guest of his friend
Mr. Mason, who was residing on his
rectory of Aston, the biographer of

To Dr. Priestley, a man of still bolder
and more ardent mind, Mr. Shore also
extended a friendly patronage; and Dr.
Priestley has inscribed to him his His-
tory of the Christian Church, as to one
"whose conduct had long proved him
to be a steady friend of Christianity, and
whose object it had been to preserve it
as unmixed as possible with every thing
that has a tendency to corrupt and de-
base it."

Mr. Shore was not less active in his
endeavours to regain for Protestant
Dissenters the rights of which they had
been deprived in the reign of Charles
II., and which were but imperfectly
restored at the time of the Revolution.
He not only concurred in all the ap-
plications which were made to Parlia-
ment, but he exerted to the utmost that
high influence which he possessed in the
exalted ranks of society. He lived to
witness the success of these applications;
and some of his latest thoughts were em-
ployed upon this gratifying proof of the
increased liberality of the times, and
this advancement in the general liberty
of the subject.

Throughout life, Mr. Shore looked
with solicitude to the popular parts of
our well-balanced Constitution, which
he thought in more danger of injury
than the monarchical or aristocratical
portions of it. He looked with an ap-
prehension in which many great and
wise men agreed with him, to an in-
crease of the influence of the Crown too
great for the safety of the people; and
in his character of a citizen of this
country he thought it his duty to support
all measures which tended to maintain,
or even to give an increase, correspond-
ent to the increased influence of the
Crown, to the rights and privileges of
the commonalty. In his own county of
Derby he was the supporter of the house
of Cavendish, because that house was a
supporter of the principles which he
thought essential to the maintenance of
the public weal. And in the county of
his birth, though not of his residence,
and where he possessed great interests,
he was the supporter of that public in-
terest of which Sir George Savile might,
in his day, be accounted the illustrious
representative. When the principles
of those who leaned to the monarchical,
and of those who leaned to the popular,
part of the Constitution, became posited

on the great question of Parliamentary
Reform, Mr. Shore was among the fore-
most of those eminent persons in the
county of York who formed the York-
shire Association of former times; and
when the great Yorkshire Petition for
Reform was agreed upon, he was one of
the deputies to whom the care of it was
committed. A list of the members of
that Association who met at York is be-
fore me. But few are at this day living.
Of the two deputies with Mr. Shore, the
Rev. Christopher Wyvill and Sir James
Innes, who became afterwards Duke of
Roxburgh, both are dead.

Through the period of alarm, Mr.
Shore still retained his former principles.
He was attached to the political party of
which Mr. Fox might be regarded as at
that time the representative; but it was
entirely an attachment lying in commu-
nity of sentiment - an attachment so
truly independent, that it might be at
once broken when the community of
sentiment had disappeared.

In later periods, Mr. Shore has shown
the importance with which he regarded
the question of the improvement of our
representation, and the infusion of a
greater number of really elected mem-
bers into the Commons' House of Par-
liament. To what extent his views of
Reform were carried, or what modifica-
tion they may have undergone in the
long period during which the question
has been under discussion, the writer has
not the means of judging. But the same
principle which urged him to support
popular interests, since, by so doing, he
would best support the balance of the
Constitution, would have induced him
equally to maintain the just rights of
the Throne, had he seen them invaded.
And when the county armed in its de.
fence in the year 1803, Mr. Shore ap-
peared in the novel character of a mili-
tary officer, and raised a company of
volunteers chiefly from amongst his
own tenantry and dependants, whose
services were accepted by the Crown.

Activity of body, no less than activity
and energy of mind, belonged to Mr.
Shore. He enjoyed through his long
life an enviable state of health, and that
evenness and elasticity of spirits which
belong peculiarly to those who are con-
scious of pure intention, prone to benefi-
cial action, and who have the hope which
religion gives. He sunk very gradually
into the tomb. His was truly a green
old age.
There was the freshness and
the floral hue of youth upon his coun-

tenance; but the bent form and the few
crisp hairs of silvery whiteness showed
that he was a man of many days. Mr.
Shore had married, about the time
when he settled at Meersbrook, the only
daughter of Freeman Flower, Esq. of
Clapham, in Surrey; and his declining
years were soothed by conjugal affection
and by filial tenderness, and he has de-
parted full of days and honour, enjoying
the undiminished regard of his friends,
and the high admiration of all who can
honour worth and a wise consistency.

On Monday, the 24th of November,
1828, his remains were committed to the
family vault in Norton Church. By the
desire of the deceased, the funeral was
quite private; and the only gentlemen,
not relations, present on the occasion,
were Messrs. Read, Bagshawe, Mills;
the Rev. J. Williams, formerly Minister
of the Chapel at Norton; and the pre-
sent Minister, the Rev. H. H. Piper.

On Sunday, Nov. 30. a funeral ser-
mon was preached by the Rev. H. H.
Piper, at the Chapel at Norton, to a
numerous congregation; and the follow-
ing Sunday, the chapel, in the morning,
was closed, and the family and congrega-
tion attended the church, when the Vicar
delivered a most useful and impressive
discourse from Isaiah, xl. 6. He paid
a just and liberal tribute to the virtues
of the deceased. Sermons were also
preached by the Rev. N. Philipps, D. D.,
and the Rev. Peter Wright, at the Uni-
tarian Chapels in Norfolk Street, and at
the Music-Hall, Sheffield, which bore
testimony to the amiable and excellent
character of the deceased. Sheffield
Independent.

-

SNEYD, Walter, Esq.; at Keel
Hall, near Newcastle-under-Lyme;
June 23. 1829; in his 78th year.

Mr. Sneyd was the descendant of an
ancient Staffordshire family, whose prin-
cipal seat was formerly at Bradwell, in
that county, but in the reign of Eliza-
beth was transferred to Keel.

Erdeswicke (whose "Survey " was
written circa 1580) thus details the
origin of the family :-" Somewhat east-
erly of Talk (a place on the north-west
extremity of Staffordshire) stands Brad-
well, y seat of Raufe, ye son of Sir Wm.
Sneyd, Kt. who is y fourth man from
the raiser of that family, William by
name, a citizen of Chester. This Wil
liam, y Chester man, was ye son of
Nicholas, y son of Richard, to which
Richard, or Richard his father, y Lord
Audley gave Bradwell, as I have heard,

« ElőzőTovább »