Oldalképek
PDF
ePub

To the first of these petitions, but not without difficulty, Mrs. Dodd first got the hands of the jury that found the bill against her husband, and after that, as it is fuppofed, of the jury that tried him. It was then circulated about, and all the while the cry for mercy was kept up in the news-papers, and the merits and fufferings of the unfortunate divine were fo artfully represented by paragraphs therein inferted, that, in a short space of time, no fewer than twenty-three thoufand names were subscribed thereto. Moreover, letters and addreffes, written alfo by Johnson, imploring their interpofition, were fent to the minifter and other great perfons.

While the two petitions were in fufpence, the following obfervations, penned by Dr. Johnson, appeared in the public papers:

[ocr errors]

Yesterday was prefented to the secretary of state, by earl Percy, a petition in favour of Dr. Dodd, figned by twenty-three thousand hands. On this ⚫ occafion it is natural to confider,

[ocr errors]

That, in all countries, penal laws have been relaxed, as particular reasons have emerged.

That a life eminently beneficent, a fingle action eminently good, or even the power of being useful to the public, have been fufficient to protect the life of a delinquent.

That no arbiter of life and death has ever been ' cenfured for granting the life of a criminal to honest and powerful folicitation.

That the man for whom a nation petitions, muft < be prefumed to have merit uncommon, in kind or in degree; for, however the mode of collecting • fubfcriptions,

L18

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

fubfcriptions, or the right of judgment exercised by the subscribers, may be open to difpute, it is, at least, plain, that fomething is done for this man that was never done for any other; and government, which muft proceed upon general views, may rationally conclude, that this man is fomething better than other offenders have been, or has done fomething more than others have done.

That though the people cannot judge of the ad• miniftration of juftice fo well as their governors, yet their voice has always been regarded.

That this is a cafe in which the petitioners de⚫ termine against their own intereft; thofe for whofe ' protection the law was made, intreat its relaxation, and our governors cannot be charged with the confequences which the people bring upon them• felves.

[ocr errors]

That as this is a cafe without example, it will ⚫ probably be without confequences, and many ages 'will elapfe before fuch a crime is again committed ⚫ by fuch a man.

[ocr errors]

That though life be fpared, juftice may be fa<tisfied with ruin, imprisonment, exile, infamy, and penury.

That if the people now commit an error, their error is on the part of mercy: and that perhaps ' history cannot fhew a time, in which the life of a criminal, guilty of nothing above fraud, was refufed to the cry of nations, to the joint fupplica<tion of three and twenty thousand petitioners.'

While Dodd was waiting the event of the petitions, his wife and friends were not idle. Dr. Johnfon told

me,

me, that they had offered Akerman, the keeper of Newgate, a thousand pounds to let him efcape; and that failing, that a number of them, with banknotes in their pockets, to the amount of five hundred pounds, had watched for a whole evening, about the door of the prifon, for an opportunity of corrupting the turnkey, but could not fucceed in the attempt.

When all hopes of a favourable anfwer to either of the petitions were at an end, Johnfon drew up for publication a fmall collection of what are called

Occafional papers by the late William Dodd, L. L. D.' and five hundred copies thereof were printed for the benefit of his wife; but fhe, confcious that they were not of her husband's writing, would not confent to their being publifhed; and the whole number, except two or three copies, was fup preffed. The laft office he performed for this wretched man, was the compofing a fermon, which he delivered in the chapel of Newgate, on Friday 6th June, 1777, and which was soon after published with the title of The Convict's Addrefs.'

Johnfon had never feen the face of Dodd in his life. His wife had found her way to him during his confinement, and had interefted him fo ftrongly in his behalf, that he lamented his fate, as he would have done that of an intimate friend under the like circumstances. He was deeply concerned at the failure of the petitions; and asked me at the time, if the request contained in them was not fuch an one as ought to have been granted to the prayer of twenty-three thousand fubjects? to which I answered, that the fubfcription of popular petitions was a thing of VOL. I. courfe,

M m

courfe, and that, therefore, the difference between twenty and twenty thoufand names was inconfiderable. He further cenfured the clergy very feverely, for not interpofing in his behalf, and said, that their inactivity arose from a paltry fear of being reproached with partiality towards one of their own order.

Here I cannot forbear remarking, an inconfiftency in the opinion of Johnson refpecting the cafe of Dodd. He aflifted in the folicitations for his pardon, yet, in his private judgment, he thought him unworthy of it, having been known to fay, that had he been the advifer of the king, he fhould have told him that, in par doning Dodd, his juftice, in remitting the Perreaus to their fentence, would have been called in question.

About this time, Dr. Johnfon changed his dwelling in Johnson's court, for a fomewhat larger in Bolt court, Fleet street, where he commenced an intimacy with the landlord of it, a very worthy and fenfible man, fome time fince deceafed, Mr. Edmund Allen the printer. Behind it was a garden, which he took delight in watering; a room on the ground-floor was affigned to Mrs. Williams, and the whole of the two pair of stairs floor was made a repofitory for his books; one of the rooms thereon being his study. Here, in the intervals of his refidence at Streatham, he received the vifits of his friends, and, to the most intimate of them, fometimes gave, not inelegant dinners.

Being at ease in his circumstances, and free from that folicitude which had embittered the former part of his life, he funk into indolence, till his faculties feemed to be impaired: deafnefs grew upon him; long intervals of mental abfence interrupted his con

verfation,

versation, and it was difficult to engage his attention to any fubject. His friends, from these fymptoms, concluded, that his lamp was emitting its laft rays, but the lapfe of a fhort period gave them ample proofs to the contrary.

In the year 1774, the long-agitated question of literary property received a final decifion, on an appeal to the fupreme judicature of this kingdom, whereby it was, in effect, declared, that fuch property was merely ideal, and exifted only in imagination *. The immediate confequence of this determination

In the arguments in this cafe, on a special verdict, in the court of King's-bench, it was admitted, that precedents, directly to the point, were wanting it was, therefore, determined by lord Manf field and two other judges, Yates alone diffenting, upon the fimple principles of natural juftice and moral fitne's, that the right contended for did exift; and that these are part of the law of England is afferted, and has ever been understood. Vide Dodderidge's English Lawyer,' page 154 to 161, and Doctor and Student' paffim. Nevertheless, in the argument of an appeal to the lords from a decree of the court of Chancery in 1774, it was contended, that, in new cafes, the judges had no right to decide by the rules of moral fitnefs and equitable right, but were to be ruled by precedents alone. An objection the more remarkable, as coming from men who are known to defpife the ftudy of antiquity, to have ridiculed the perufal of records, and to have treated with the utmost scorn, what they are pleased to term, black-letter learning. If this be law, and every judicial determination needs a precedent, we are left at a lofs to account for thofe early and original determinations for which no precedent could be found, but which are now become fundamental principles of law: fuch, for instance, as that a bare right of action is not affignable; that, of. things fixed to the freehold, felony cannot be committed; that a release to one trefpaffer is a release to all; and numberless others. Lord Hardwicke has been known to direct a search for precedents, and, when none could be found, to fay- I will make one.'

[blocks in formation]
« ElőzőTovább »